| | <<<Back 1 day (to 2015/11/01) | 20151102 |
| kens | Well just installed VS 2015 and it can't debug 64 bit applications either. Keeps tellign me the remote debugger is not working (even though the project properties are set to local debugginb) | 10:02.18 |
| | Time for a Goggle I htink | 10:02.27 |
| | I find it amusing that, even on a 64-bit installation VS is a 32-bit app, whcih is what causes ths reidiculous complication | 10:03.40 |
| | Aha turn off firewall and it works (boggles!) | 10:06.42 |
| | chrisl bug 696317, I assume that's the gserrors.h thing ? | 11:53.20 |
| chrisl | kens: yep, just about answer it | 11:53.30 |
| kens | THought so just wanted to make sure it wasn't eaten as spam by GMail :-) | 11:53.49 |
| henrys | our clocks have now changed as well | 14:28.40 |
| kens | Yes, so we are back to normal | 14:28.58 |
| chrisl | Robin_Watts: sorry, I'm going to have dump Bug 696305 back on you | 15:09.03 |
| Robin_Watts | ok. | 15:09.41 |
| chrisl | I done my best to explain what I've observed..... | 15:10.24 |
| Robin_Watts | chrisl: I have my head up the jpeglib at the moment, so can't context swap to look just at the mo. | 15:12.38 |
| chrisl | Robin_Watts: I knew you were busy, that's why I pressed on with it, but it's going to take an age for me to get to know that code. | 15:14.33 |
| Robin_Watts | sure. Thanks for looking. | 15:14.50 |
| mvrhel_laptop | henrys: so windows 10 and visual studio 2015 community edition built and ran gs fine for me. There were some errors thrown when doing a build on the whole solution. Building each project independently worked fine. I suspect there is some parallel building going on with the former that might cause issues | 16:29.44 |
| henrys` | mvrhel_laptop: thanks I'll try that on vmware. | 16:34.40 |
| | mvrhel_laptop: installing 2015 now. cygwin, git, ssh and rsync seem to work, that's encouraging | 19:25.52 |
| mvrhel_laptop | henrys: the only issue I see with 2015 is that some of the extension tools are not yet available | 19:26.41 |
| | the RockMargin tool has to be hacked a bit to add the version | 19:26.58 |
| | for example | 19:27.01 |
| | And for some reason the open XML editor is not yet an available extension | 19:27.27 |
| henrys | mvrhel_laptop: hard to imagine what they left out of this download... still going. | 19:28.56 |
| | mvrhel_laptop: my first job was to install google chrome and the first hit I got in explorer was a rogue chrome... I wonder how many people trip over that and completely screw their system with crapware. | 19:30.13 |
| mvrhel_laptop | henrys: oh wow. I had not seen that. | 19:30.43 |
| | henrys: so I was looking over the prospectus on our 401K options again. where you at one point looking to see if we had any options that had a smaller load. e.g. something indexed | 19:30.47 |
| henrys | mvrhel_laptop: it's on my todo list and I was going to talk to Miles but he's been really busy with other stuff, from what I've learned we need to part company with the current financial guy handling our account ... Miles' driving buddy | 19:32.53 |
| mvrhel_laptop | I see | 19:33.12 |
| henrys | mvrhel_laptop: a lot of companies just let you do it yourself, which is what I'd like but I don't know if that is an option | 19:34.01 |
| mvrhel_laptop | henrys: I would think something like the small plan 401k at vanguard would work well. https://investor.vanguard.com/what-we-offer/small-business/compare-plans | 19:38.40 |
| | vanguard has piles of index funds and some of the smallest loads in the industry | 19:39.02 |
| henrys | mvrhel_laptop: I don't think what we have now is a big load... we have a middle man somehow. Not sure why | 19:44.57 |
| mvrhel_laptop | anything over 1 percent is considered to be too llarge. | 19:45.53 |
| | but I was not aware this is someone else taking a cut | 19:46.09 |
| | I guess I better look at my statement. | 19:46.22 |
| | I suspect getting something like this set up https://institutional.vanguard.com/VGApp/iip/site/institutional/clientsolutions/sdc would not be too difficult | 19:46.46 |
| | I suspect the self directed 401Ks have certain tax implications that make employer matching difficult as the idea of those is that there is one person who is both the employee and the employer. Not our situation | 19:49.46 |
| | but going directly to an investment house like vanguard and just setting up a small business 401K would I suspect be straight forward | 19:50.54 |
| | anyway, back to my bugs | 19:51.00 |
| | Forward 1 day (to 2015/11/03)>>> | |
IRC Logs