| | <<<Back 1 day (to 2015/11/27) | 20151128 |
| leot | good afternoon all | 13:48.38 |
| | Anyone with 2-3 minutes free can review and maybe apply some very small improvements to the man pages and usage message of mupdf? More or less just simple one-line diffs :) -- http://www.netbsd.org/~leot/tmp/mupdf/ | 13:58.19 |
| sebras | leot: I'm looking at them. | 14:08.24 |
| leot | sebras: thank you! Please let me know if they're missing something. | 14:09.29 |
| | The reason for "file.pdf" -> "file" is both for consistency with mutool and also because these days MuPDF isn't just a PDF viewer (I forgot to append these reasons to the diffs comments) | 14:11.22 |
| sebras | leot: ah, so your main gripe is that the manpage and the help information is not identical? | 14:11.33 |
| | leot: with regards to the [page] argument. | 14:12.01 |
| leot | sebras: it's not a gripe, IMHO it's good that the man pages documents everything. | 14:12.27 |
| | ...and "file.pdf" can also be confusing because MuPDF also supports other formats | 14:13.58 |
| sebras | leot: yeah, I agree with you, but I just wanted what was the main problem. :) | 14:20.32 |
| | leot: I'm a little bit worried about that the man pages do not retain the formatting used previously (.B and .RI). | 14:21.27 |
| | leot: was the removal of the formatting intentional or accidental? | 14:21.47 |
| leot | Intentional, mutool(1) seems the same. | 14:22.22 |
| sebras | leot: otherwise the proposed changes look alright to me. Do you mind attaching them to a bug over at http://bugs.ghostscript.com/ so they don't get lost? | 14:22.38 |
| leot | Ok, I will just open a bug in that case! | 14:23.18 |
| sebras | leot: so it does! weird. I'm not sure that's a good thing. I think manpages are supposed to use some specific formatting for command arguments (though at this moment I'm not sure I remember the details). | 14:23.37 |
| | leot: sounds like a good idea. thanks! :) | 14:23.48 |
| | Forward 1 day (to 2015/11/29)>>> | |
IRC Logs