[gs-bugs] [Bug 689679] Process color name in Separation color space
needs special handling
bugs.ghostscript.com-bugzilla-daemon at ghostscript.com
bugs.ghostscript.com-bugzilla-daemon at ghostscript.com
Sat Feb 2 17:56:48 PST 2008
http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689679
alex.cherepanov at artifex.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |WORKSFORME
------- Additional Comments From alex.cherepanov at artifex.com 2008-02-02 17:56 -------
The sample file needs non-standard definition of customcolorimage
that is included only when it is not provided by the environment.
For this file to work, one needs to un-define TN5044 operators
with -dNO_TN5044 option.
It is possible to fix the file with idiom recognition but the fix
will have some run-time cost in all cases. All recent Adobe products
bind procedures in place and discard the value returned by operator bind.
So no direct idiom recognition is possible.
However, the procedure that conditionally defines TN5044 operators
can be modified by an IdiomSet resource.
/IMndef { 1 index where { pop pop pop } { def } ifelse } bdef
The redefined IMndef can, in turn. look into it's operands
and handle PageMaker 6.5 case specially.
I'm closing the bug as WORKS because the sample file works as designed.
The file paints wrong picture in the CMYK environment that provides TN5044
operators such as Ghostscript or Distiller. Ghostscript already has an option
to work around the bug.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
More information about the gs-bugs
mailing list