[gs-bugs] [Bug 690250] Performance slower than other PCL s/w

bugs.ghostscript.com-bugzilla-daemon at ghostscript.com bugs.ghostscript.com-bugzilla-daemon at ghostscript.com
Fri Mar 6 12:08:20 PST 2009


http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690250





------- Additional Comments From ken.sharp at artifex.com  2009-03-06 12:08 -------
Using the supplied PostScript file, Jaws (32 bpp, 600 dpi display list) renders
the file in 3.2 seconds. Harlequin, in as close a configuration as possible
takes 7.9 seconds.

Running Jaws in page mode (no display list) takes 2.1 seconds (so 50% slower
using display list). Discarding the output so that no disk writing takes place
takes 1.6 seconds. Harlequin can't be run without a display list, so these tests
cannot be reproduced there.

A release build of GS on my (different) PC running at 600 dpi takes ~25 seconds.
It does look like we are performing badly relative to others.





------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.



More information about the gs-bugs mailing list