[gs-bugs] [Bug 691529] Regression: difference with r11549
bugzilla-daemon at ghostscript.com
bugzilla-daemon at ghostscript.com
Thu Aug 5 07:45:10 UTC 2010
http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691529
Ken Sharp <ken.sharp at artifex.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #3 from Ken Sharp <ken.sharp at artifex.com> 2010-08-05 07:45:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> I've been going through the thousands of differences caused by r11549 and so
> far have come across one file which appears to be a regression. See the
> attached 11548.png and 11549.png files.
>
> The command lines used:
>
> bin/gs -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -o test.pdf -r300 ./Bug687044.ps
> bin/gs -sDEVICE=ppmraw -o test.ppm -r300 ./test.pdf
Actually this file has always been wrong. By some weird co-incidence
Ghostscript was previously able to produce the expected result, but Acrobat
(our reference) always missed the offending text.
This is believed to be another manifestation of type 3 font problems with
pdfwrite, and we already have an open report for this (which already includes
this file).
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 691383 ***
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ghostscript.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
More information about the gs-bugs
mailing list