[gs-code-review] Suggested patch for cet 16-08
Igor V. Melichev
igor.melichev at artifex.com
Fri Oct 27 00:24:57 PDT 2006
Raph,
I think it's fine to commit if no regressions.
Igor.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Raph Levien" <raph.levien at gmail.com>
To: <gs-code-review at ghostscript.com>
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2006 9:39 AM
Subject: [gs-code-review] Suggested patch for cet 16-08
> The diffs in test 16-08 are caused by Ghostscript using the name
> ".OrigFont", while Adobe uses simply "OrigFont." The attached patch
> changes the name, but I want to run it by people to see if it's going
> to break something stupid, before just committing it. I also need to
> run some regressions.
>
> Raph
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> gs-code-review mailing list
> gs-code-review at ghostscript.com
> http://www.ghostscript.com/mailman/listinfo/gs-code-review
>
More information about the gs-code-review
mailing list