[gs-cvs] rev 7641 - trunk/gs/doc
leonardo at ghostscript.com
leonardo at ghostscript.com
Thu Jan 25 03:10:07 PST 2007
Author: leonardo
Date: 2007-01-25 03:10:07 -0800 (Thu, 25 Jan 2007)
New Revision: 7641
Modified:
trunk/gs/doc/pscet_status.txt
Log:
pscet_status.txt : Misprints in 11-19-6 .
Modified: trunk/gs/doc/pscet_status.txt
===================================================================
--- trunk/gs/doc/pscet_status.txt 2007-01-25 11:04:35 UTC (rev 7640)
+++ trunk/gs/doc/pscet_status.txt 2007-01-25 11:10:07 UTC (rev 7641)
@@ -1811,19 +1811,19 @@
with removing unrelated things and inserting a debug printing.
The 2 files differ in a small thing : wheter it access
currentpoint after ustrokepath, or not.
- The raster appear to be different.
- The log file tell us that no error happen,
- because the currenpointy coordinates are successfully printed
+ The rasters (included into the ZIP) appear to be different !
+ The log files (included into the ZIP) tell us that no error happen,
+ because the currenpoint coordinates are successfully printed
(in the order Y X).
- The position od the cross depends on the
+ The position of the 2nd cross depends on the
currentpoint after ustrokepath,
but 'currentpoint' appears to cnahge it !
- I believe that CPSI actually didn't pas the "interference" test,
+ I believe that CPSI actually didn't pass the "interference" test,
which 1-19-6 is designed for.
As we noticed from other 20 tests (unpublished), this behavior
appears pretty occasional, so we're unable to analyze it completely
and to reproduce it in Ghostscript.
- Tek matches CPSI though. I can't know why.
+ Tek matches CPSI though - I can't know why.
Welcome anybody who can improve this analyzis.
11-20-1 OK Minor differences visually reviewed by HAS
More information about the gs-cvs
mailing list