[gs-cvs] rev 7641 - trunk/gs/doc

leonardo at ghostscript.com leonardo at ghostscript.com
Thu Jan 25 03:10:07 PST 2007


Author: leonardo
Date: 2007-01-25 03:10:07 -0800 (Thu, 25 Jan 2007)
New Revision: 7641

Modified:
   trunk/gs/doc/pscet_status.txt
Log:
pscet_status.txt : Misprints in 11-19-6 .


Modified: trunk/gs/doc/pscet_status.txt
===================================================================
--- trunk/gs/doc/pscet_status.txt	2007-01-25 11:04:35 UTC (rev 7640)
+++ trunk/gs/doc/pscet_status.txt	2007-01-25 11:10:07 UTC (rev 7641)
@@ -1811,19 +1811,19 @@
 		with removing unrelated things and inserting a debug printing.
 		The 2 files differ in a small thing : wheter it access
 		currentpoint after ustrokepath, or not.
-		The raster appear to be different.
-		The log file tell us that no error happen,
-		because the currenpointy coordinates are successfully printed
+		The rasters (included into the ZIP) appear to be different !
+		The log files (included into the ZIP) tell us that no error happen,
+		because the currenpoint coordinates are successfully printed
 		(in the order Y X).
-		The position od the cross depends on the
+		The position of the 2nd cross depends on the
 		currentpoint after ustrokepath,
 		but 'currentpoint' appears to cnahge it !
-		I believe that CPSI actually didn't pas the "interference" test,
+		I believe that CPSI actually didn't pass the "interference" test,
 		which 1-19-6 is designed for.
 		As we noticed from other 20 tests (unpublished), this behavior 
 		appears pretty occasional, so we're unable to analyze it completely 
 		and to reproduce it in Ghostscript.
-		Tek matches CPSI though. I can't know why.
+		Tek matches CPSI though - I can't know why.
 		Welcome anybody who can improve this analyzis.
 
 11-20-1  OK	Minor differences visually reviewed by HAS



More information about the gs-cvs mailing list