[gs-devel] Re: Upcoming Ghostscript 8.60 release

[Koji Otani]

From: Ralph Giles <giles at ghostscript.com>
Subject: Re: [gs-devel] Re: Upcoming Ghostscript 8.60 release
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:27:37 -0700
Message-ID: <20070813202737.GB28970 at ghostscript.com>

giles> On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 10:53:02AM -0700, Ray Johnston wrote:
giles> 
giles> > Possibly some documentation about what's automatic and what is not with
giles> > the mkromfs and genint processing is needed to make it easier to know
giles> > how to add files.
giles> 
giles> Probably a good idea. The patch didn't just called runlibfile on the new 
giles> library files, without an associated magic '%% Replace' directive. The
giles> attached patch does this, and presumedly also works. I tested tiger, but
giles> not the cjkv support.
giles> 

Thank you. 
I tested this patch with CJK font. It's OK.

giles> Questions:
giles> 
giles> 1. I gather from the implementation of translate_path() in geninit.c 
giles> that unix-style paths like (cjkv/cjvkinit.c) are portable postscript
giles> under ghostscript. Is this correct? Might be be cleaner to move them
giles> up a level regardless?
giles> 
giles> 2. Inclusion of the module is conditional on the NOCJKV symbol. I 
giles> couldn't figure out what this is for. If it's just for testing, can
giles> it be removed? We wish to avoid unnecessary conditionals in the code
giles> 

This conditionals for analyzing when problems occur.
If with defined NOCJKV problems still occur, we can suspect codes not in
CJK patch.

---
Koji Otani