[gs-devel] Re: Upcoming Ghostscript 8.60 release

[Koji Otani]

I'm sorry for regressions.
I want to check these, but I didn't find these test
files. (spec_gs.pdf, regression test .../comparefiles/*).
Please tell me where these files are or how to get these files.
----
Koji Otani.

From: Till Kamppeter <till.kamppeter at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gs-devel] Re: Upcoming Ghostscript 8.60 release
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 22:28:27 +0100
Message-ID: <46C21E7B.7090905 at gmail.com>

till.kamppeter> Otani-san,
till.kamppeter> 
till.kamppeter> we have reverted your patches in the Ghostscript SVN repositories for 
till.kamppeter> now. They are now attached to the following bug report as proposed patches:
till.kamppeter> 
till.kamppeter> http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689304
till.kamppeter> 
till.kamppeter> Please check the two regressions and post new patches if you have a fix. 
till.kamppeter> Thank you.
till.kamppeter> 
till.kamppeter>     Till
till.kamppeter> 
till.kamppeter> 
till.kamppeter> Till Kamppeter wrote:
till.kamppeter> > It seems that the CJK patches break rendering of non-CJK documents, see
till.kamppeter> > 
till.kamppeter> > http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689404
till.kamppeter> > http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689405
till.kamppeter> > 
till.kamppeter> > The "rev 8185" mentioned in the bug report is the revision with which 
till.kamppeter> > the CJK patches were introduced.
till.kamppeter> > 
till.kamppeter> > Otani-san and Toratani-san, can you check this? Thanks.
till.kamppeter> > 
till.kamppeter> >    Till
till.kamppeter> > 
till.kamppeter> > 
till.kamppeter> > Koji Otani wrote:
till.kamppeter> >> From: Ralph Giles <giles at ghostscript.com>
till.kamppeter> >> Subject: Re: [gs-devel] Re: Upcoming Ghostscript 8.60 release
till.kamppeter> >> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:27:37 -0700
till.kamppeter> >> Message-ID: <20070813202737.GB28970 at ghostscript.com>
till.kamppeter> >>
till.kamppeter> >> giles> On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 10:53:02AM -0700, Ray Johnston wrote:
till.kamppeter> >> giles> giles> > Possibly some documentation about what's automatic and 
till.kamppeter> >> what is not with
till.kamppeter> >> giles> > the mkromfs and genint processing is needed to make it easier 
till.kamppeter> >> to know
till.kamppeter> >> giles> > how to add files.
till.kamppeter> >> giles> giles> Probably a good idea. The patch didn't just called 
till.kamppeter> >> runlibfile on the new giles> library files, without an associated 
till.kamppeter> >> magic '%% Replace' directive. The
till.kamppeter> >> giles> attached patch does this, and presumedly also works. I tested 
till.kamppeter> >> tiger, but
till.kamppeter> >> giles> not the cjkv support.
till.kamppeter> >> giles>
till.kamppeter> >> Thank you. I tested this patch with CJK font. It's OK.
till.kamppeter> >>
till.kamppeter> >> giles> Questions:
till.kamppeter> >> giles> giles> 1. I gather from the implementation of translate_path() 
till.kamppeter> >> in geninit.c giles> that unix-style paths like (cjkv/cjvkinit.c) are 
till.kamppeter> >> portable postscript
till.kamppeter> >> giles> under ghostscript. Is this correct? Might be be cleaner to move 
till.kamppeter> >> them
till.kamppeter> >> giles> up a level regardless?
till.kamppeter> >> giles> giles> 2. Inclusion of the module is conditional on the NOCJKV 
till.kamppeter> >> symbol. I giles> couldn't figure out what this is for. If it's just 
till.kamppeter> >> for testing, can
till.kamppeter> >> giles> it be removed? We wish to avoid unnecessary conditionals in the 
till.kamppeter> >> code
till.kamppeter> >> giles>
till.kamppeter> >> This conditionals for analyzing when problems occur.
till.kamppeter> >> If with defined NOCJKV problems still occur, we can suspect codes not in
till.kamppeter> >> CJK patch.
till.kamppeter> >>
till.kamppeter> >> ---
till.kamppeter> >> Koji Otani
till.kamppeter> >>
till.kamppeter> > 
till.kamppeter> >