| | <<<Back 1 day (to 2011/07/09) | 2011/07/10 |
| Robin_Watts | Number 2 on your bmpcmp (test/pdf/Bug6901014_Arioli_NAG-Warwick.pdf) looks like a definite regression. | 00:01.34 |
| | Odd, cos your fix looks plausible. | 00:01.42 |
| | oh, wait no. | 00:02.30 |
| | No, sorry, your test does look plausible. | 00:02.51 |
| | I haven't looked at the test in question, but you appear to have changed the test from next.all[0] == run.all[0] to be memcmp(psrc, run.v, spp) == 0 | 00:03.50 |
| | why psrc? Surely next.v ? | 00:04.02 |
| | anyhow.bedtime for me. night all. | 00:04.24 |
| | tor8: Am I right in thinking that mupdf only supports isolated non-knockout groups ? | 17:16.34 |
| tor8 | yes. | 17:19.33 |
| sebras | Robin_Watts: you would also be right in that it is an itch I'm eager to scratch together with tor8... ;) | 17:21.20 |
| Robin_Watts | Well, supporting non-isolated is trivial, I think. | 18:38.42 |
| | Fixing knockout means changing all the plotting functions from being dest = dest (+) src to being out = src1 (+) src2 (where (+) is the blending operation) | 18:41.01 |
| | (I think, etc) | 18:41.11 |
| | Forward 1 day (to 2011/07/11)>>> | |
IRC Logs