| | <<<Back 1 day (to 2012/04/14) | 2012/04/15 |
| yorke | hey there | 03:07.29 |
| | i'm trying to create a multithreaded version of the android viewer | 03:07.46 |
| | but upon changing fz_new_context to accept a fz_locks_context (and making no other modifications) i'm getting a segfault | 03:08.34 |
| | i'm basically adapting the code from the provided multi-threaded.c example | 03:09.17 |
| | is there anything special i should be looking out for? | 03:09.23 |
| | i have to go, but will be coming back to check the server logs. thanks in advance for any help! | 03:53.52 |
| | oh this is the stack trace if its of any use: http://pastebin.com/wxNHcYk7 | 05:13.36 |
| vtorri | hey | 09:22.55 |
| | how can I crosscompile mupdf ? (using mingw-w64) | 09:23.18 |
| | i mean | 09:23.22 |
| | is there something already done ? | 09:23.38 |
| | or should I set CC, AR etc.... ? | 09:23.49 |
| Robin_Watts | hi vtorri | 10:20.44 |
| | grep for "beagle-cross" in Makerules. | 10:21.25 |
| | There is a whole section of different cross compile targets there. | 10:22.22 |
| vtorri | nothing about mingw-w64, though | 10:22.46 |
| | that would be nice to add | 10:22.51 |
| Robin_Watts | vtorri: Give us a block to add. | 12:56.02 |
| vtorri | mingw-w64 can compile for windows 32bits and 64 bits | 12:57.26 |
| | so you have to give me which OS value you want for each compiler | 12:57.49 |
| Robin_Watts | Well, mingw-w64 compiling for 64 bits isn't a cross compile, right? | 13:00.05 |
| vtorri | one can use the host, btw | 13:09.18 |
| | i686-w64-mingw32 | 13:09.43 |
| | and | 13:09.44 |
| | x86_64-w64-mingw32 | 13:09.51 |
| mistereol | hi everyone | 15:01.56 |
| atnbueno | Hello | 16:31.21 |
| ghostbot | privet | 16:31.21 |
| atnbueno | One question for the mupdf developers: | 16:31.37 |
| | In mupdf-0.9-windows there are a few tools (pdfclean.exe, pdfextract.exe, ...) that have dissapeared in mupdf-1.0rc1-windows | 16:32.35 |
| | (I've seen that pdfdraw.exe has been renamed to mudraw.exe) | 16:33.00 |
| | The question is: are they gone for good? If yes, any reason not to use them? | 16:33.51 |
| | (I mean, is there any problem with version 0.9 of these tools that make you recommend stop using them?) | 16:35.05 |
| | Also, a suggestion: I've compressed mudraw.exe and mupdf.exe with UPX just under 5MiB. As the original package mupdf-1.0rc1-windows.zip is 6.4MiB, I'd suggest to add this step to your binary generation workflow. | 16:37.35 |
| Robin_Watts | atnbueno: They are all still there. mupdfclean etc. | 16:37.59 |
| | I think possibly binaries got missed out of the rc1 archive though. | 16:38.17 |
| | that will be fixed for the proper release. | 16:38.23 |
| atnbueno | Thanks | 16:39.26 |
| vtorri | Robin_Watts: so, do you think that i686-w64-mingw32 and x86_64-w64-mingw32are good enough for the value of OS in Makerules ? | 19:14.18 |
| | Forward 1 day (to 2012/04/16)>>> | |
IRC Logs