| <<<Back 1 day (to 2012/08/10) | 2012/08/11 |
Robin_Watts | mvrhel: (For the logs). I've committed the patch. I'll log in from the hotel tomorrow. | 21:47.40 |
| Evening mvrhel_laptop | 22:42.22 |
mvrhel_laptop | hi Robin_Watts | 22:42.39 |
Robin_Watts | You wanted to speak to me? | 22:42.49 |
mvrhel_laptop | so I had one thing I wanted to check with respect your patch but I can do it after you do your commit | 22:42.57 |
Robin_Watts | I have committed | 22:43.04 |
mvrhel_laptop | ok cool | 22:43.09 |
Robin_Watts | What did you want to check? | 22:43.19 |
mvrhel_laptop | it had to do with making sure the test for the 1/2 and 2x scale work still | 22:43.23 |
Robin_Watts | Right. I *believe* they should, because that's what the scale_factor is used for. | 22:43.48 |
mvrhel_laptop | right | 22:43.52 |
| I am just going to do a quick check. I have some files that I was using for that when I wrote it | 22:44.12 |
Robin_Watts | and I made (I believe) the appropriate changes to that. But testing it would be good. | 22:44.15 |
mvrhel_laptop | ok cool | 22:44.20 |
| thanks | 22:44.22 |
Robin_Watts | actually. now you've got me worried. | 22:44.29 |
mvrhel_laptop | hehe | 22:44.34 |
| the issue is the (x-1)/(z-1) | 22:44.49 |
| vs x/z | 22:44.52 |
Robin_Watts | yes, that's just occurred to me. | 22:45.03 |
mvrhel_laptop | my belief is that we want to add in the -1 | 22:45.10 |
Robin_Watts | could well do, yes. | 22:45.28 |
mvrhel_laptop | but I will check this out | 22:45.34 |
Robin_Watts | If it was working before, then it seems we should do that, yes. | 22:45.47 |
mvrhel_laptop | yes | 22:45.52 |
| so with the levels there is an issue with the subtractive colors vs additive colors and the > vs >= on the thresholds | 22:46.20 |
| I need to walk myself through this | 22:46.33 |
Robin_Watts | yeah. | 22:46.34 |
| it looked like a > vs >= thing to me. | 22:46.43 |
| and I'd wondered it it was maybe subtractive/additive that did it. | 22:46.58 |
mvrhel_laptop | yes. | 22:47.06 |
Robin_Watts | My knowledge of sse isn't great, but I thought I remembered thinking at the time that we could only do >= not > | 22:47.32 |
mvrhel_laptop | well no we can do > but not >= | 22:47.45 |
Robin_Watts | right. | 22:47.51 |
| Can we do < ? | 22:47.55 |
| Yes, by reversing the operands, stupid, sorry. | 22:48.17 |
| So we can do >= if we need to. | 22:48.42 |
mvrhel_laptop | yes. and I have a switch that occurs for subtractive vs additive early on | 22:49.26 |
Robin_Watts | so at worst we'll need to split to two routines. | 22:49.45 |
mvrhel_laptop | again. I just need to step carefully through and make a sanity check | 22:49.46 |
| right | 22:49.49 |
Robin_Watts | yeah. | 22:49.50 |
mvrhel_laptop | Once I do that, I need to check that the phase is ok | 22:50.16 |
Robin_Watts | on hold to credit card company. How can they be "extremely busy" at 10 to midnight? | 22:50.23 |
mvrhel_laptop | hehe | 22:50.38 |
| in india | 22:50.40 |
Robin_Watts | Unless they have lasses with leeds accents in India, I suspect this was a UK based call centre :) | 22:58.51 |
mvrhel_laptop | hehe | 22:59.15 |
Robin_Watts | Right. I'm off to bed. Talk to you all from Malta, hopefully. | 22:59.32 |
mvrhel_laptop | nice! | 22:59.38 |
| have fun | 22:59.47 |
| Forward 1 day (to 2012/08/12)>>> | |