| <<<Back 1 day (to 2013/08/23) | 2013/08/24 |
ray_laptop | mvrhel_laptop: so when do you bug out for .jp ??? | 00:29.48 |
| BTW, I *finally* got my Pi | 00:30.07 |
| Now I have to take it home to hook it up to an HDMI and see if it boots :-) | 00:30.58 |
| mvrhel_laptop: I assume that initially, all I need is an HDMI video and USB KB (and maybe mouse) | 00:32.24 |
| what's the yellow RCA coax jack? is that old fashioned video ??? | 00:33.10 |
| (it's obvious I haven't tried plugging the coax into my TV, but the Pi costs $65 and the 3D LED backlit 60" TV costs $2000) | 00:37.02 |
| I don't want to fry my TV :-) | 00:37.58 |
mvrhel_laptop | ray_laptop: yup just hdmi out and a usb keyboard | 02:48.44 |
| leaving tomorrow morning | 02:48.53 |
| spent day trying to get stuff done around here so I don't get any "support" emails etc | 02:49.12 |
| Robin_Watts: are you up by chance? | 06:07.37 |
| I will check in with you in the morning. I wanted to get a couple interactive pdfs form filling and maybe the calculator file on my nexus 10. I thought I had those around but apparently they were on the other nexus 10 that someone else took | 06:13.09 |
Robin_Watts | mvrhel_laptop: (For the logs) I'm here now. | 08:50.03 |
mvrhel_laptop | Robin_Watts: Thank you for the files! | 14:03.08 |
Robin_Watts | mvrhel_laptop: No worries. Let me know if you want any more | 14:22.14 |
| Have a good flight etc. | 14:22.18 |
mvrhel_laptop | thanks | 14:30.02 |
sebras | Robin_Watts: was there some part of the log that i should be reading besides what you wrote last evening? | 15:37.24 |
| malc__: ok, so I downloaded some trace32 documentation and had a look at your remote destination patch. | 18:52.28 |
| malc__: your patch introduces a new gotornamed struct in the union, which I think is unnecessary. | 18:55.01 |
| malc__: why couldn't name just be present in the existing gotor struct? | 18:56.20 |
malc__ | sebras: as a union, sure why not, as an additional field no, given that pagenumber makes no sense in this context | 18:56.59 |
sebras | malc__: I mean that struct gotor should have both page number and name. | 18:57.54 |
| malc__: when the link object specifies a page number then int page is set in struct gotor and if a named destination is specified then char *name is set. | 18:58.25 |
malc__ | sebras: you will also have to have a flags field then | 18:59.09 |
sebras | malc__: I wonder if it is correct to even attempt to resolve the named destination in "this" pdf file if the link is GotoR... | 18:59.10 |
malc__ | sebras: it's not, that's why i use the name of the dest | 18:59.47 |
sebras | malc__: not necessarily. int page could be 0 and name != NULL for named links and the other way around for links with page number specified..? | 18:59.57 |
malc__ | sebras: and then, while opening other file i use that to resolve dest there | 19:00.05 |
sebras | malc__: yes, that seems correct to me as well. | 19:00.17 |
| malc__: oh, and should you really want a flag then there is already a flags member in struct gotor. | 19:01.10 |
| malc__: currently it is used to determine the coordinates of the bounding box I think. | 19:01.36 |
malc__ | sebras: anyhow, you won't be using my patch regardless so just come up with something and i'll gladly use that instead of carrying my version around | 19:01.39 |
| sebras: presence of lt, rb | 19:02.05 |
sebras | malc__: exactly. | 19:02.11 |
| malc__: maybe it is not unreasonable to have flags to indicate if page or name is present. | 19:02.35 |
malc__ | sebras: but really, gotor with page number is quite different from the one with named dest, but whatever | 19:03.10 |
sebras | malc__: gotor with a file specification and a page number ought to be interpreted as open this page in that file over there, no..? | 19:03.49 |
| malc__: sure, you don't have to lookup what page to open in the remote file, but that is the only difference I think. | 19:04.24 |
malc__ | yes | 19:04.35 |
| but, they are mutually exclusive (pN vs nameddest that is), or make no sense when seen together if you will | 19:05.31 |
sebras | malc__: true enought. | 19:05.45 |
| Robin_Watts: I hope I have fixed the commit messages you didn't like on sebras/master. | 21:39.47 |
| Robin_Watts: malc: malc made a draft patch making sure GoToR link annotations with named destinations (in remote documents) were not resolved in the current document. the patch didn't cover destinations that were strings and unnecessarily introduced a new struct in the fz_link_dest union. I think that my patch over at sebras/master resolves this and also cleans up the link annotation code a bit. | 21:47.02 |
Guest3350 | hi | 21:57.16 |
ghostbot | niihau, guest3350 | 21:57.16 |
Guest3350 | do u speak english? | 21:57.42 |
| hi | 21:59.52 |
sebras | ghostbot: ta shi nide pengyou, ni dei shuo yingwen... | 22:18.32 |
Robin_Watts | sebras: Thanks. I will take a look on monday. | 22:39.45 |
| Forward 1 day (to 2013/08/25)>>> | |