IRC Logs

Log of #ghostscript at irc.freenode.net.

Search:
 <<<Back 1 day (to 2013/08/23)2013/08/24 
ray_laptop mvrhel_laptop: so when do you bug out for .jp ???00:29.48 
  BTW, I *finally* got my Pi00:30.07 
  Now I have to take it home to hook it up to an HDMI and see if it boots :-)00:30.58 
  mvrhel_laptop: I assume that initially, all I need is an HDMI video and USB KB (and maybe mouse)00:32.24 
  what's the yellow RCA coax jack? is that old fashioned video ???00:33.10 
  (it's obvious I haven't tried plugging the coax into my TV, but the Pi costs $65 and the 3D LED backlit 60" TV costs $2000)00:37.02 
  I don't want to fry my TV :-)00:37.58 
mvrhel_laptop ray_laptop: yup just hdmi out and a usb keyboard02:48.44 
  leaving tomorrow morning02:48.53 
  spent day trying to get stuff done around here so I don't get any "support" emails etc02:49.12 
  Robin_Watts: are you up by chance?06:07.37 
  I will check in with you in the morning. I wanted to get a couple interactive pdfs form filling and maybe the calculator file on my nexus 10. I thought I had those around but apparently they were on the other nexus 10 that someone else took 06:13.09 
Robin_Watts mvrhel_laptop: (For the logs) I'm here now.08:50.03 
mvrhel_laptop Robin_Watts: Thank you for the files!14:03.08 
Robin_Watts mvrhel_laptop: No worries. Let me know if you want any more14:22.14 
  Have a good flight etc.14:22.18 
mvrhel_laptop thanks14:30.02 
sebras Robin_Watts: was there some part of the log that i should be reading besides what you wrote last evening?15:37.24 
  malc__: ok, so I downloaded some trace32 documentation and had a look at your remote destination patch.18:52.28 
  malc__: your patch introduces a new gotornamed struct in the union, which I think is unnecessary.18:55.01 
  malc__: why couldn't name just be present in the existing gotor struct?18:56.20 
malc__ sebras: as a union, sure why not, as an additional field no, given that pagenumber makes no sense in this context18:56.59 
sebras malc__: I mean that struct gotor should have both page number and name.18:57.54 
  malc__: when the link object specifies a page number then int page is set in struct gotor and if a named destination is specified then char *name is set.18:58.25 
malc__ sebras: you will also have to have a flags field then18:59.09 
sebras malc__: I wonder if it is correct to even attempt to resolve the named destination in "this" pdf file if the link is GotoR...18:59.10 
malc__ sebras: it's not, that's why i use the name of the dest18:59.47 
sebras malc__: not necessarily. int page could be 0 and name != NULL for named links and the other way around for links with page number specified..?18:59.57 
malc__ sebras: and then, while opening other file i use that to resolve dest there19:00.05 
sebras malc__: yes, that seems correct to me as well.19:00.17 
  malc__: oh, and should you really want a flag then there is already a flags member in struct gotor.19:01.10 
  malc__: currently it is used to determine the coordinates of the bounding box I think.19:01.36 
malc__ sebras: anyhow, you won't be using my patch regardless so just come up with something and i'll gladly use that instead of carrying my version around19:01.39 
  sebras: presence of lt, rb19:02.05 
sebras malc__: exactly.19:02.11 
  malc__: maybe it is not unreasonable to have flags to indicate if page or name is present.19:02.35 
malc__ sebras: but really, gotor with page number is quite different from the one with named dest, but whatever19:03.10 
sebras malc__: gotor with a file specification and a page number ought to be interpreted as open this page in that file over there, no..?19:03.49 
  malc__: sure, you don't have to lookup what page to open in the remote file, but that is the only difference I think.19:04.24 
malc__ yes19:04.35 
  but, they are mutually exclusive (pN vs nameddest that is), or make no sense when seen together if you will19:05.31 
sebras malc__: true enought.19:05.45 
  Robin_Watts: I hope I have fixed the commit messages you didn't like on sebras/master.21:39.47 
  Robin_Watts: malc: malc made a draft patch making sure GoToR link annotations with named destinations (in remote documents) were not resolved in the current document. the patch didn't cover destinations that were strings and unnecessarily introduced a new struct in the fz_link_dest union. I think that my patch over at sebras/master resolves this and also cleans up the link annotation code a bit.21:47.02 
Guest3350 hi21:57.16 
ghostbot niihau, guest335021:57.16 
Guest3350 do u speak english?21:57.42 
  hi21:59.52 
sebras ghostbot: ta shi nide pengyou, ni dei shuo yingwen...22:18.32 
Robin_Watts sebras: Thanks. I will take a look on monday.22:39.45 
 Forward 1 day (to 2013/08/25)>>> 
ghostscript.com
Search: