| <<<Back 1 day (to 2014/03/24) | 2014/03/25 |
Robin_Watts | OK, new sot.git online. | 00:19.36 |
spanners | Jogux: Bug fixes to the fonts in resources should be self-contained, I think. | 00:21.23 |
kens | paulgardiner (for the logs)< canyou look at this please ? | 08:13.07 |
| http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22614720/adding-views-to-mupdfreaderview | 08:13.07 |
| Hmm, the Virgin flight says '3 seats left' presumably at the price which is 461.75 | 08:18.37 |
| Oh th | 08:19.24 |
| that's one way... | 08:19.30 |
| Wow, total cost is 911.45 | 08:19.46 |
chrisl | Maybe fly out on the Friday? | 08:23.19 |
kens | Not a lot different | 08:23.29 |
chrisl | More seats! | 08:23.39 |
kens | I'm guessing we're hitting the holiday season | 08:23.44 |
| More seats is good foc ourse | 08:23.58 |
| Have to get Niles to spring an extra night at his place | 08:24.13 |
| Of course, going out on a Saturday we hit all the holidaymakers | 08:24.55 |
chrisl | Yeh, I was thinking the same thing | 08:25.09 |
kens | If that '3 seats left' is true we can't all fit on that flight anyway, there are 4 of us | 08:25.34 |
chrisl | Well, one or more could book PE | 08:25.53 |
kens | would not fancy the last remaining seat assignments either | 08:25.54 |
| PE is 1800 flyign out O.O | 08:26.34 |
chrisl | Yeh, so maybe an extra night in a motel is the better option for Miles! | 08:26.57 |
kens | 'only' 730 flying on Friday | 08:26.58 |
| We could try a different airline (reluctantly) | 08:27.29 |
| I presume it would be helpful for tor to meet up with us. I am hoping Robin doesn't mind driving again.... | 08:28.52 |
| BA is slightly more expensive | 08:29.15 |
chrisl | IIRC, neither Robin nor Tor will want to fly BA | 08:29.41 |
kens | OK well lets see what elsse we cna find | 08:29.59 |
chrisl | Also, IIRC, Tor has already visited Miles's place, so he might want to skip that, keep the trip as short as possible | 08:31.04 |
kens | I think Tor's last visit was the same time as me, before the cabin was there, he'd expressed an interest in another vist, but we cna check with him of course | 08:31.39 |
| United are the cheapest | 08:36.06 |
| Looks like choices are United, Lufthansa, BA or Virgin. I don't fancy FinnAir or Iberia and American starts over £1000 | 08:37.42 |
| A lot of the airlines are showing the Saturday fligths as extremely full. | 08:38.36 |
chrisl | That's not really surprising | 08:38.51 |
kens | Most are shoing 2/3/4 seats left | 08:39.01 |
| The early morning United flight has a reasonable number of seats | 08:39.49 |
| THe later (and more expensive) flight has fewer seats | 08:41.00 |
chrisl | I'd rather not suffer a packed flight if I can avoid it | 08:42.03 |
kens | THe BA flight looks ok going by the seat map | 08:42.23 |
| But most of the aisle seats are marked' disability seat', not sure what that means exactly | 08:43.04 |
| The Virgin flight won't give me a seat map | 08:44.02 |
| I guess I'll wait until Robin/Paul/Tor are online | 08:44.58 |
kens | disappears off to talk to tree surgeons, back in a minute | 08:45.35 |
pedro_ | hi folks | 09:27.50 |
kens | Morning | 09:27.57 |
paulgardiner | hi | 09:28.07 |
ghostbot | bonjour, paulgardiner | 09:28.07 |
chrisl | Howdie | 09:28.17 |
pedro_ | forgot just how much fun the ooxml/epage debugging was | 09:33.40 |
chrisl | pedro_: do you also enjoy whipping yourself with willow branches and other forms of self flagellation?? | 09:35.22 |
pedro_ | chrisl: its muh the same ;) | 09:35.38 |
| much | 09:35.50 |
pedro_ | really shoudl go back to a wired keyboard... | 09:36.01 |
chrisl | As opposed to a "weird keyboard"? | 09:36.23 |
pedro_ | :) | 09:36.44 |
chrisl | I'm wondering if it's the wireless nature of my mouse that's causing my problems with that..... | 09:37.31 |
kens | paulgardiner : did you see Miles' email ? | 09:38.26 |
| chrisl the Lufthansa flight turns out to be the United flight in disguise. So the airlines reduce to United, BA or Virgin, and on the whole I'd really rather not fly with United again | 09:39.04 |
paulgardiner | kens: what's the problem with United? | 09:40.41 |
kens | THe in flight 'entertainment' | 09:40.51 |
| and they soak you for extra leg room seats | 09:41.16 |
paulgardiner | Coming back, I had the best screen of any flight I've been on... ah, but you were an exit seat. Was that the problem? | 09:41.42 |
kens | No, its the content.... | 09:41.51 |
| And the flight out was dreadful | 09:42.04 |
kens | accepts the flight back had nice screens | 09:42.16 |
| The flickering electrics didn't fill me with confidence either | 09:42.43 |
paulgardiner | Out seemed below average and back above to me | 09:43.30 |
| Oh yeah, there was no content on flight out | 09:43.49 |
kens | I didn't liek the selection on the way back much, and the outbound flight was execrable | 09:43.51 |
paulgardiner | I remember now | 09:43.54 |
| I thought there was loads of choice coming back. Took ages to browse through it. | 09:44.54 |
kens | There was lots of choice, but I wasn't keen on any of it very much, and it had that terrible touch screen 'flip'# interface, where nothing happens until you gesture firmly, and then 20 films fly past | 09:45.40 |
| But its the fligh out I really didn't like | 09:46.23 |
chrisl | As we'll *probably* be relying on Robin to drive, there's probably not much point discussing until he appears..... I don't fancy a 5+ hour journey on public transport instead! | 09:47.04 |
kens | chrisl yes, just wanted to make sure Pual had seen the mail :-) | 09:47.33 |
| And note that the LH flight is actually a UA flight | 09:47.46 |
paulgardiner | We should pick the least popular flights to maximie chance of a spare adjoining seat | 09:54.27 |
| Whatever maximie means! | 09:54.51 |
kens | I can't tell how popular the Virgin flight is | 09:54.57 |
| Won't give me a seat map without a booking | 09:55.09 |
Robin_Watts | chrisl: eh? | 10:15.12 |
chrisl | Robin_Watts: Um? | 10:15.39 |
kens | Robin_Watts : you saw Miles' email ? | 10:16.23 |
Robin_Watts | just seen it. | 10:17.27 |
| 5 hour drive? crumbs. | 10:17.31 |
| oh, on public transport it would be 5+ hours, gotcha. | 10:18.01 |
kens | I don't remember it being 5 hours | 10:18.02 |
chrisl | Robin_Watts: yeh, bus + train apparently takes ~5 hours | 10:18.25 |
kens | It is a fair way | 10:18.37 |
chrisl | Of course, legally speaking, I could hire a car and drive, but I don't fancy my first experience of driving on the colonial side of the road being immediately after an 11 hour flight | 10:20.02 |
Robin_Watts | chrisl: I'll drive it, no problem. | 10:20.41 |
| We'll put at least one other person on the car rental just in case I get struck by a migrane or something. | 10:20.59 |
| United flights are MUCH cheaper. | 10:23.11 |
kens | well, not *that* much | 10:23.22 |
| 150 overall more or less | 10:23.29 |
Robin_Watts | has anyone seatguru'd to see what they are like? | 10:24.26 |
kens | didn't get a defintieive answer, 3 possible configurations | 10:24.45 |
| I believe the united flight is cheaper because its early, and therefore less popular | 10:26.05 |
| The later flight is not so much cheaper | 10:26.11 |
kens | suspects United may also be less popular generally..... | 10:26.28 |
Robin_Watts | United has power everywhere. | 10:27.02 |
kens | Are you certain ? | 10:27.15 |
Robin_Watts | That trumps decent seat back video IMHO as I can bring my own and watch on the laptop. | 10:27.20 |
kens | THe flight I looked up did not | 10:27.21 |
Robin_Watts | On United 900, Sat 31 May: http://www.seatguru.com/airlines/United_Airlines/United_Airlines_Boeing_777-200_2_New.php | 10:27.52 |
kens | Well, assuming that's the plane they use | 10:28.35 |
| config 3 has no power | 10:28.59 |
Robin_Watts | kens: That's the only config option searguru gave me. | 10:29.24 |
kens | Robin_Watts : in the overview at the left I see 3 versions for the 77-200 | 10:29.44 |
Robin_Watts | and likewise on the way back same layout. | 10:29.49 |
| Yes, but when you search on a flight it only gives you the one layout. | 10:30.10 |
kens | Yes, but that assumes the info is correct, and they don't switch planes | 10:30.25 |
Robin_Watts | It does assume that. | 10:30.32 |
kens | Hmm expedia not showing the early United departure now | 10:30.57 |
chrisl | It's probably not a normal AC outlet, is it? | 10:30.58 |
Robin_Watts | Config 2 is a 3x3x3 layout. | 10:31.15 |
kens | chrisl it was a normal US one before | 10:31.17 |
Robin_Watts | It is a US outlet, supposedly. | 10:31.28 |
kens | Oh, there's the early united flight now | 10:31.35 |
Robin_Watts | Though I would take adapters in case :) | 10:31.36 |
| config 3 is 2x5x2 with no power. | 10:31.57 |
kens | Yeah that's what I mean | 10:32.08 |
Robin_Watts | COnfig 1 has power too. | 10:32.14 |
kens | Yes, only v3 hasn't | 10:32.21 |
pedro_ | thought the last couple of united international flights I had were combi us/euro/uk sockets | 10:32.27 |
| domestic were just US | 10:32.39 |
Robin_Watts | but I suspect that they'll be very reluctant to change from v2 to v3 as that would bugger seat assignments up. | 10:32.44 |
kens | Robin_Watts : assuming it is that config | 10:33.00 |
Robin_Watts | kens: Indeed. | 10:33.08 |
kens | The onlky way to be certain is to try a booking I htink | 10:33.12 |
| Give me a minute | 10:33.34 |
| 19:35 return trip on Tuesday | 10:34.19 |
| Huh, won't give me a seat map without a purchase | 10:34.45 |
| expedia does show it as 3,3,3 | 10:35.08 |
Robin_Watts | Well, Virgin will sell me 5 adult seats on those dates. | 10:35.19 |
| Personally, I'd be tempted to go for the united one, but I'll go with the flow. | 10:35.39 |
kens | I'd prefer Virgin, it also departs later, 10:25 is possible, but kind of early | 10:35.59 |
| OTOH Virgin gets in at 4pm which is sort of late | 10:36.22 |
Robin_Watts | Frankly, I'd rather go early in this case as it means we get to drive to guernville before the rush hour hits. | 10:36.29 |
kens | Its a couple of hours by car as I recall, so early seems better I guess :-( | 10:36.55 |
Robin_Watts | We either need to drive through SF itself, or we need to drive around the bay etc. Which might be nice, but will be longer. | 10:37.15 |
kens | Hmm, I htought we would just go due North over the bridge, but I didn't look at a map last time | 10:37.47 |
Robin_Watts | kens: Yes, if we want to drive through SF, we go straight north. | 10:38.05 |
kens | (Miles was driving and he knew the way) | 10:38.09 |
Robin_Watts | but if the traffic is bad in the city (like at rush hour) and we want to avoid that, it's a longer, more circuitour route. | 10:38.36 |
chrisl | As I said, we could fly out on the Friday - the flights should be quieter | 10:38.44 |
kens | I'd think if we get in early we could be clear of SF before 5pm | 10:38.56 |
Robin_Watts | kens: yes. | 10:39.09 |
kens | chrisl that's OK too, but needs a night in a hotel extra | 10:39.10 |
| I guess we'd have to talk to Miles. WOUld also be good to know what Tor wants to do | 10:39.32 |
| An early flight might be hard for him | 10:39.41 |
chrisl | I'd thought if we went on Friday, we'd stay near the airport Friday night, and head up Saturday morning. | 10:40.22 |
kens | Seems fair | 10:40.34 |
chrisl | But it entirely depends on other people's plans, and the costs | 10:40.57 |
Robin_Watts | Personally, I'd ignore the "only 3 seats left" stuff, as it's almost always a sales pitch to make you bok now. | 10:41.18 |
kens | I'm fairly sure that's true | 10:43.38 |
Robin_Watts | We need to speak to tor8 really. | 10:44.50 |
kens | WSell, I'd prefer Virgin because I like the entertainment better, and they won't rip me off so much ofr extra legroom, but flying in early would trump that, if Tor is OK with that. | 10:44.56 |
Robin_Watts | I was just going to say that I think tor8 has refused to ever fly virgin again :) | 10:45.16 |
chrisl | what did virgin do to tor, then? | 10:45.40 |
Robin_Watts | kens: I've had too many experiences with virgin where the movies don't work at all. | 10:45.44 |
| "Sorry, we'll need to reboot the system. Again." | 10:45.56 |
| chrisl: He missed a connecting flight, and virgin couldn't get him out on any other airline. Just told him to come back tomorrow. | 10:46.42 |
chrisl | That's pretty crap :;-( | 10:47.53 |
| Robin_Watts: btw, you can pull in the new LCMS to master whenever you are ready | 10:52.20 |
Robin_Watts | chrisl: Ta. | 10:52.54 |
chrisl | I'll be looking at updating the other third party libs next week, too | 10:53.22 |
| kens: Bug 695108: you'll note he says the fix was in Sept, but he's trying 9.10, which was released in 2nd Sept....... and only had commits up to about August 25th | 10:59.28 |
kens | chrisl if he actually uploads the PDF I'll take a look | 10:59.44 |
chrisl | I just thought it was worth pointing out he's not testing what he thinks he ios | 11:00.28 |
kens | :-) | 11:00.35 |
Robin_Watts | Jogux: Is the NAS missing on points for you? | 11:01.14 |
Guest10482 | Hi, I use pcl6.exe to convert pcl to pdf , I have an issue on a new server, I think a library is missing but I don't know which... | 11:04.36 |
| here is the error :+ ..\pcl\pcfsel.c:443: pcl_reselect_font(): Fatal | ..\pcl\pctext.c:946: pcl_text(): Fatal Warning interpreter exited with error code -100 Flushing to end of job | 11:04.49 |
| if anyone have an idea :) | 11:05.06 |
kens | Yes, report a bug, this is not a missing library | 11:05.21 |
Guest10482 | same version with same pcl file on another server work fine ? | 11:06.07 |
kens | Then its probably a font difference, or a configuration problem. | 11:06.28 |
chrisl | Guest10482: are you build the exe yourself? | 11:06.58 |
Guest10482 | no I download binary I try v9.10 and v9.06 | 11:07.30 |
kens | What OS ? | 11:07.46 |
tor8 | Robin_Watts: holy crap, tuesday is a bad day to fly! | 11:07.51 |
Robin_Watts | tor8: Morning. | 11:08.07 |
| We're trying to decide between virgin or united. | 11:08.16 |
tor8 | mon, wed, thu, fri are 400gbp, tuesday, 2500. | 11:08.25 |
Guest10482 | Windows 2012 R2 | 11:08.27 |
Robin_Watts | united gets in earlier and has power at every seat. | 11:08.37 |
kens | tor8 why so much ? | 11:08.52 |
tor8 | kens: probably sold out :( | 11:09.08 |
kens | oh | 11:09.14 |
tor8 | all other days are more reasonable. or it may be scheduling, there are no tuesday departures from CPH to SFO. | 11:09.39 |
kens | tor8 was assuming you would meet us in Heathrow again,to share drive | 11:09.57 |
pedro_ | Robin_Watts: can't even list /mnt from here | 11:10.23 |
tor8 | kens: yeah, it looks like that may be a better option if we're having the meeting on mon/tue given the lack of (non-extortionist) direct flights on tuesday | 11:10.36 |
Robin_Watts | tor8: Plan is to fly out on saturday, drive up to guernsville, check in there. | 11:10.50 |
tor8 | I'd rather connect than stay yet another night to fly back on wednesday | 11:11.05 |
| and sharing drive would be convenient | 11:11.15 |
kens | OK tor8 the problem then is that the saturday flight with united is early | 11:11.22 |
| departs at 10:25 | 11:11.30 |
Robin_Watts | Who are direct flights from CPH to SFO with ? | 11:11.44 |
tor8 | Robin_Watts: SAS | 11:11.50 |
Robin_Watts | Are they in a group with united? | 11:12.08 |
tor8 | one of the few direct flights to the US out of CPH, and it's a fairly new line | 11:12.15 |
| they're star alliance | 11:12.32 |
| not sure what united is | 11:12.39 |
Guest10482 | what font is use for a default document? I try to convert a simple text file with only "Test" and it is not working | 11:12.46 |
Robin_Watts | tor8: United and SAS are both Star Alliance. | 11:12.47 |
kens | onestar I think | 11:12.48 |
Robin_Watts | So you could fly out to SFO direct, then fly back via london. | 11:13.05 |
kens | wonders what time tor's SAS flight get sin | 11:13.22 |
tor8 | Robin_Watts: yeah, I might be able to do that | 11:13.30 |
| or fly back with BA or lufthansa | 11:13.44 |
Robin_Watts | What time is that flight? | 11:13.53 |
| If it's within an hour or so of us, that'd be fine. | 11:14.18 |
kens | united gets in at 13;30 | 11:15.05 |
tor8 | Robin_Watts: SK935 arrives at 14:45 | 11:16.06 |
kens | close enough I'd say | 11:16.21 |
Robin_Watts | assuming it's not late, yeah. | 11:16.29 |
| cos we'd clear customs etc, then go get car. | 11:16.39 |
kens | well we can never control late flights, if tor not on our flight its always a risk | 11:16.58 |
| Hopefully we'd still be on the road by 4 | 11:17.30 |
Robin_Watts | And if he's late, we can get a milkshake from prestons! | 11:17.44 |
kens | ROFL | 11:17.50 |
tor8 | kens: yeah, united would be cutting it very tight if it leaves at 10:25 | 11:18.52 |
kens | That was my concern | 11:19.02 |
| but if you go direct, np | 11:19.14 |
tor8 | yeah, problem is finding a reasonable return combination, which looks like it could be tricky | 11:19.36 |
| expedia errors out :( | 11:19.40 |
| I thought I'd found one, but it leaves SFO at 7 in the morning on tuesday. doubt that'll be popular :) | 11:22.28 |
kens | No, I guess not ;-) | 11:22.49 |
tor8 | I can find one set of connecting flights on virgin (VS19 and VS20) but that's priced ridicously | 11:23.44 |
| Robin_Watts: I take it you all still refuse flying BA? | 11:25.54 |
kens | really ? THe virgin combo for me was £900 LHR-SFO-LHR | 11:26.01 |
tor8 | 1700gbp for me | 11:26.19 |
Robin_Watts | tor8: Have no strong objection to BA. | 11:26.26 |
| Have no luggage for them to lose :) | 11:26.40 |
kens | Hmm I saw 1700 if I didn't fly saturday | 11:26.43 |
tor8 | because I can always find cheap decent BA flights that connect CPH-LHR-SFO | 11:26.55 |
Robin_Watts | tor8: You don't need to tie up with us on the way back. | 11:27.31 |
tor8 | my problem is finding a return trip that has the direct flight on the way out... | 11:28.20 |
| if I can't do that, I might as well come in with your flights | 11:28.42 |
kens | Hmm, yes, awkward | 11:28.45 |
tor8 | oh, I might have found one! | 11:33.03 |
| it leaves at 13.19 on the tuesday though, which could end up a tad early I fear | 11:33.39 |
kens | Yes, maybe.... | 11:34.05 |
tor8 | but would be okay for 9/10 meetings | 11:34.13 |
| kens: ah, now I see why the virgin was so expensive. it only has premium economy seats left. | 11:36.38 |
kens | wow! | 11:36.45 |
| I guess hte '3 seats left' was real then | 11:37.01 |
tor8 | so, the absolute earliest I can arrive at heathrow on saturday is 8:30 | 11:39.36 |
| and that's at T5 | 11:39.47 |
kens | Hmm, I htink United is T1 ? | 11:39.56 |
Robin_Watts | tor8: Come a day early and stay with ken? | 11:40.06 |
kens | that's fine of ocurse too | 11:40.15 |
Robin_Watts | kens: There is no T1 at the moment. It's a big pile of rubble, isn't it ? | 11:40.23 |
kens | Umm, not sure hwta the status is, good point though | 11:40.35 |
chrisl | No T2 is the big pile of rubble | 11:41.20 |
kens | thinks whole airport could be described that way | 11:41.51 |
tor8 | Robin_Watts: kens: that would work too, if it makes it easier to find a decent flight for all (given that virgin has no more seats) | 11:42.06 |
Robin_Watts | It would appear to be T1. | 11:42.11 |
kens | tor8 we'd be glad to have you stay the night | 11:42.19 |
tor8 | or I can take the direct flight that arrives an hour after you and leave the meeting before lunch on tuesday | 11:42.41 |
Robin_Watts | sorry to volunteer ken like that. Tor would be welcome here, but it's a long way to come :) | 11:42.44 |
kens | Its a smart idea robin, glad you mentioned it | 11:43.02 |
Robin_Watts | I suspect we should not assume that tuesdays meeting will be short. | 11:43.12 |
tor8 | Robin_Watts: that it is! maybe I should come two days earlier then ;) | 11:43.19 |
Robin_Watts | It probably will be, but if we assume it then it'll run for hours. | 11:43.39 |
kens | You're welcome any time tor | 11:43.45 |
| hop[efully opur plumber should be round before then to fix the guest shower too :-) | 11:43.59 |
tor8 | kens: Thanks. | 11:44.07 |
| I'm all out of luck finding return flights other than at 7 or 13 with SAS... | 11:44.40 |
| and I'd rather stay an extra day with ken than at the hyatt :) | 11:44.59 |
kens | consider that a coimpliment :-) | 11:45.19 |
| Just let me know | 11:45.29 |
Robin_Watts | https://www.google.co.uk/maps/search/Guerneville,+CA,+USA+Hotels/@38.5116964,-122.9856879,15z/data=!3m1!4b1 | 11:45.34 |
Robin_Watts | wonders where we're staying in Guernville. | 11:45.54 |
kens | Miles said over the road | 11:46.56 |
| Not sure I recall the location well enough | 11:47.06 |
| maybe creekside inn ? | 11:47.28 |
tor8 | kens: don't ask me why, but if I go via united.com it routes me on the 10.25 flight but wants 3000gbp for economy fare! | 11:58.49 |
kens | O.O | 11:58.56 |
| Outrageous! | 11:59.04 |
Robin_Watts | tor8: eh!? | 11:59.05 |
kens | came in at 780 odd here | 11:59.19 |
tor8 | yeah. ridiculous. | 11:59.39 |
Robin_Watts | I was about to say "should we all book flights then?", but... | 11:59.50 |
kens | Hey robin I didn't notice 'Highlands Resort' in Guerneville before :-) | 12:00.00 |
Robin_Watts | kens: mmm. | 12:00.12 |
| Those people who feel that clothing is optional are almost by definition those people who should not. | 12:00.36 |
| brb. | 12:01.01 |
Guest10482 | does anyone know which is the default font use by ghostpdl when no font is specfied? | 12:01.30 |
kens | THere's also the 'New Dynamic Inn' we should fit right in there | 12:01.34 |
| Guest10482 : Helvetica usually | 12:01.43 |
kens | wonders if 'homemade muffins' at the Highlands resort is a euphemism | 12:02.17 |
Guest10482 | thanks kens | 12:02.23 |
kens | OMG Google maps has a clippy :-O | 12:03.06 |
tor8 | Robin_Watts: and that was just one way, so double that fare for the total... | 12:03.44 |
kens | Hmm tor8 must be first class surely | 12:03.57 |
tor8 | flight UA930, Fare Class: United Economy (Y). | 12:04.50 |
kens | Good grief.... | 12:04.57 |
Guest10482 | mmm I don't have Helvetica on my computer( not on the server where conversion failed), if not exist another font is used? | 12:05.09 |
kens | Wait UA930,l I htought we were talking UA900 | 12:05.10 |
tor8 | kens: on the return trip | 12:05.18 |
kens | Guest10482 : severl problems, firstly what OS are you using | 12:05.31 |
tor8 | UA900 on the way out | 12:05.33 |
kens | tor8 ah right | 12:05.38 |
Guest10482 | windows 2012R2 | 12:06.05 |
tor8 | so yeah, can't do united if *I* book it, might work out if we do what we did for maui and you make the reservation and I come in to LHR on a separate booking | 12:06.16 |
kens | Hmm this is PCL not GS..... | 12:06.28 |
Guest10482 | yes | 12:06.38 |
kens | chrisl do we build the fonts into the ROMFS for GhostPCL ? | 12:06.44 |
| tor8 I can do that sure | 12:06.55 |
tor8 | kens: and checking lufthansa for other flights that arrive at the same time, most of the tuesday flights are sold out | 12:09.46 |
kens | OK.... | 12:10.00 |
tor8 | the cheapest economy options are all gone | 12:10.41 |
kens | Oh wow, let me check here | 12:10.52 |
| LOL now I'm getting prices in $US :-) | 12:11.33 |
tor8 | if I take the trip via frankfunt, I can be at SFO at 12:45 which should be an hour before you lot | 12:11.38 |
| otherwise I'd suggest BA if you can all stomach it | 12:11.56 |
kens | THat's fine for us of course | 12:12.00 |
| BA is OK | 12:12.04 |
tor8 | that way we can all get on the same flights and I don't have to do scheduling contortions | 12:12.22 |
kens | thinks robin doesn't do BA ? | 12:12.43 |
chrisl | kens: yes we do build the fonts in | 12:13.02 |
kens | OK so in that case Guest10482 you can't fail to find Helvetica, its built into the executable | 12:13.25 |
chrisl | Erm, I don't know what the PCL default font is..... | 12:14.04 |
kens | chrisl whatever it is, I would think its one fo the base 35, and therefore included | 12:14.23 |
chrisl | PCL has 80+ fonts, but yes, the default ought to be there | 12:15.08 |
tor8 | BA has two flights a day both ways, 14.35 and 17.10 out and 16.40 or 19.20 back | 12:16.54 |
Guest10482 | ok so it is not a font issue, if there are builtin... | 12:16.57 |
kens | Guest10482 : It may be referencing a font on disk which is corrup on one system (for example) | 12:17.18 |
Robin_Watts | kens: I can do BA. | 12:17.43 |
kens | tor8 problem with that is that's a late arrival, we'd be in the SF rush hour | 12:17.44 |
chrisl | I don't think PCL can reference fonts on disk..... | 12:17.52 |
kens | OK then scratch that | 12:17.59 |
Robin_Watts | What's the BA flight? | 12:18.10 |
kens | looking now | 12:18.15 |
tor8 | the 17.10 flight arrives at 18.30 so that'd be a bit late | 12:18.23 |
Guest10482 | I try to convert a simple text file with only "test" inside so I think it use the default font, and conversion failed | 12:18.26 |
chrisl | Except for the default font set if you don't include them in the exe (which we do) | 12:18.32 |
kens | Firefox grumbles about the BA site.... | 12:18.57 |
chrisl | Guest10482: what's the Windows version on the system(s) that work? | 12:19.10 |
tor8 | Robin_Watts: BA284 through BA287 | 12:19.22 |
Robin_Watts | BA0285 ? | 12:19.31 |
tor8 | 285 is the early flight out, yes | 12:19.46 |
kens | BA0285 looks good, 11:30 departure | 12:19.50 |
Robin_Watts | 11:30 -> 14:35 ? | 12:19.51 |
kens | yeah that one | 12:19.54 |
Robin_Watts | That would be best I reckon. | 12:20.00 |
kens | 14:35 arrival, so shuld be OK for onward travel | 12:20.21 |
Robin_Watts | 0286 back? | 12:20.25 |
kens | I would say so yes | 12:20.35 |
| 16:40 is a better time than usual | 12:20.41 |
tor8 | 284 is earlier, but 286 is my usual flight :) | 12:20.46 |
kens | as long as we don't go into the afternoon on day 2 | 12:20.49 |
Guest10482 | I try on my compter windows 7 and on another server 2012 R2 , it is ok | 12:20.57 |
Robin_Watts | kens: no, you're looking at 284 | 12:21.02 |
kens | AM I ? | 12:21.06 |
Guest10482 | I download pcl6.exe from here : http://downloads.ghostscript.com/public/binaries/ghostpcl-9.10-win32.zip | 12:21.08 |
kens | Oh yes, eyes slipped | 12:21.14 |
Robin_Watts | 286 is 19:20 | 12:21.16 |
kens | Well I guess 19:20 maybe better given the likely meeting discussions | 12:21.33 |
Robin_Watts | ok, 19:20 then. | 12:21.42 |
kens | Tor8 how do these work for you ? | 12:21.55 |
tor8 | BA285 out, BA286 back? | 12:22.24 |
kens | Yes exactly | 12:22.34 |
tor8 | that works great for me | 12:22.40 |
chrisl | Guest10482: TBH, unless you can identify the difference(s) between the two systems that trigger the problem, it's hard for us to help :-( | 12:22.52 |
kens | SHould we check with Paul ? :-) | 12:22.57 |
Robin_Watts | What was wrong with the united flights again? | 12:23.04 |
kens | has lost track now | 12:23.15 |
| Its an hour earlier, tricky connection for tor maybe ? | 12:23.42 |
tor8 | Robin_Watts: 6400gbp fare for me | 12:24.08 |
kens | oh yes, cost..... | 12:24.17 |
tor8 | or having to make separate bookings *and* a tricky connection | 12:24.24 |
| Robin_Watts: http://techcrunch.com/2014/03/24/gbatteries-batterybox/ | 12:25.45 |
Robin_Watts | I'm getting 926 quid on BA. | 12:25.56 |
Guest10482 | chrisl yes I understand, the two windows 2012 are VM and come from the same base, so I don't understand... maybe an update... | 12:25.58 |
Robin_Watts | for a flight with no power. | 12:26.00 |
kens | Robin I saw slightly more cost, but yes | 12:26.15 |
Guest10482 | is pcl6 use ms vc++ ? | 12:26.16 |
Robin_Watts | as opposed to 748 on united for a flight with nicer seating and power at every seat. | 12:26.28 |
kens | Guest10482 : WHy would that matter ? Its s compiled application | 12:26.39 |
tor8 | Robin_Watts: wow. I'm only getting 822gbp for the BA flights (and that is with connections) | 12:26.49 |
kens | : I'm seein £996 for BA | 12:27.10 |
| adding the two components | 12:27.17 |
Robin_Watts | I am tempted to fly united with paul. We'll land at 13:30, can get car etc and then meet up with tor. | 12:27.26 |
kens | 558 + 438 | 12:27.27 |
kens | doesn't see BA as better than United | 12:27.49 |
paulgardiner | That suits me | 12:27.50 |
kens | Except from Tor's POV of course | 12:28.03 |
Robin_Watts | Tor will still be flying on the flights that are convenient for him, right? | 12:28.33 |
tor8 | if the united seats are anything like delta or AA, I'd rather not... those seats were really uncomfortable. | 12:28.35 |
kens | Huh p[rice went down when I selcted an outbound flight :-) | 12:29.01 |
tor8 | I had a stiff neck for days after last meeting :( | 12:29.03 |
Robin_Watts | tor8: You come on the BA flight. If It's an hour different, right? That's about right for us getting the car. | 12:29.17 |
kens | I get £926 | 12:29.20 |
Robin_Watts | 926 is what I got. | 12:29.27 |
tor8 | Robin_Watts: yeah. BA or LH look to be my best options, and they arrive +/- one hour of the United flight | 12:29.46 |
Guest10482 | yes but maybe it use external dll? some application need vcredist | 12:29.55 |
kens | For me LH *was* the United flight, maybe they have another | 12:30.04 |
tor8 | a real shame about tuesday being full, or I could get a direct flight! | 12:30.06 |
Robin_Watts | tor8: Then, it sounds like I won't be inconveniencing anyone by opting for united. | 12:30.10 |
kens | Guest10482 : No | 12:30.13 |
chrisl | Guest10482: then the exe wouldn't start at all - we only used the core C lib, anyway | 12:30.26 |
kens | is not a fan of BA any more than United | 12:30.51 |
Robin_Watts | ok, I'm booking united. | 12:31.19 |
tor8 | Robin_Watts: then there's the fact that it's still impossible to do online checkins with connecting flights on any US based airline... | 12:31.24 |
Guest10482 | ok, sorry for the questions, I just try to understand what can be change on the 2 servers :) | 12:31.24 |
kens | OTOH at least the inflight entertainment won't be US TV | 12:31.28 |
chrisl | Ugh? United is suddenly quoting me in USD..... stoopid site! | 12:31.53 |
Robin_Watts | tor8: Fly whatever is easiest for you. The timing should be fine with the car hire delay, and if it's not, I'll go get a milkshake. | 12:32.01 |
kens | Yeah dfid that to me too | 12:32.04 |
chrisl | But it quoted UKP when I looked a couple of hours ago | 12:32.25 |
kens | thinks BA doesn't offer extra legroom, looking like United is winning | 12:32.28 |
| chrisl, yes me too.... | 12:32.36 |
| I guess it htinks we're in the US now | 12:32.43 |
chrisl | Let's hope the pilots know which is which! | 12:33.06 |
kens | wonders if Malaysia airways hastha problem.... | 12:33.48 |
chrisl | Guest10482: the Ghostscript/GhostPDL builds on Windows are very self contained - straight C (not C++) and link to a very minimal set of libs. | 12:34.58 |
kens | OK I' going to go and get some lunch, maybe I'll feel more enthusiastic about flying when I've eaten | 12:36.37 |
chrisl | I wonder how you get United to quote a price of Economy Plus..... | 12:37.38 |
Robin_Watts | $105 for economy plus. | 12:37.54 |
chrisl | Do you add that after you book? | 12:38.20 |
Robin_Watts | When you select seats. | 12:39.12 |
chrisl | Ah, I could be tempted.... | 12:39.30 |
tor8 | kens: heh, the LH flight is cheaper, but an hour longer, but hey, A380! I've never flown on one of those before :) | 12:44.51 |
| but yeah, some food and this might not be quite as depressing anymore... | 12:45.26 |
Guest10482 | ok thanks you chrisl and kent, I will continue to investigate... | 12:46.24 |
chrisl | Guest10482: there are some debugging flags, but I doubt any of the useful ones will work on a non-debug exe | 12:49.08 |
Guest10482 | with a -d ? | 12:49.42 |
chrisl | No, the pcl6.exe debug options are -Z... options, but as I say, you'd need to rebuild the exe from source for that | 12:50.36 |
Guest10482 | ok | 12:52.30 |
aleray | hi, I'm looking for the herschey fonts | 12:57.35 |
| running archlinux, I can't find the files | 12:57.43 |
| are they somewhere available? | 12:58.12 |
| thanks | 12:58.13 |
chrisl | Gawd, I don't think we've used those fonts in *years* | 13:00.26 |
aleray | chrisl, nice fonts for plotting :) | 13:01.19 |
| I found the files through ubuntu package gsfonts-others | 13:03.03 |
| I found the files through ubuntu package gsfonts-other | 13:03.05 |
| oups | 13:03.07 |
Robin_Watts | minivan booked. | 13:09.22 |
kens | chrisl what's economy plus on United ? | 13:09.24 |
Robin_Watts | kens: In what sense? | 13:09.46 |
kens | Robin_Watts : what's the differe3nce to economy ? | 13:10.03 |
Robin_Watts | You book for economy, then at seat picking time, can upgrade to extra legroom for $105. | 13:10.16 |
| I think it's just extra legroom. | 13:10.20 |
kens | aha extra legroom OK | 13:10.23 |
| Even more expensive than Delta :-( | 13:10.39 |
Jogux | Robin_Watts : being out the office this morning; I'l check nas/points now | 13:14.46 |
chrisl | kens: I thought there was more elbow room, too | 13:14.53 |
| aleray: is there an upstream source listed in the Ubuntu package? | 13:15.28 |
kens | chrisl possibly. On balance I'll fly United, so we're all together. BA wants to charge me £50 for an exit row | 13:15.30 |
chrisl | Oh, great, and now United has lost my search..... | 13:16.22 |
kens | SoUA900 out, and UA 930 back ? | 13:16.27 |
akerbeltz_ | hi quick question, is the localization project for ghostscript on Launchpad or is there an upstream l10n project/platform where we ought to work? | 13:16.55 |
kens | WHat localisation project ? | 13:17.05 |
| Robin_Watts : you and Paul booked already ? | 13:17.42 |
akerbeltz_ | I'm kind of assuming ghostscript can be localized into other languages? | 13:17.48 |
Jogux | robin_watts: points is decidely unhappy. it seems the nas is down, or at least no longer reachable :( | 13:17.50 |
kens | akerbeltz_ : No | 13:17.56 |
| There isn't really anything to localise | 13:18.07 |
akerbeltz_ | oh | 13:18.24 |
| ok | 13:18.25 |
| thanks | 13:18.39 |
kens | NP | 13:18.43 |
chrisl | Hmm, UA930 isn't listed for me | 13:19.13 |
kens | Oh, I wonder if I chose a stopping fligh, oops | 13:19.29 |
aleray | chrisl, don't know... http://packages.ubuntu.com/saucy/gsfonts-other | 13:19.53 |
kens | Well I certinaly chose the wrong lfight | 13:19.56 |
| chrisl UA 930 departs 7:35pm arrives 2:05 pm (Wenesday) | 13:20.42 |
chrisl | Redoing the search does bring up 930 - this doesn't inspire confidence! | 13:20.48 |
Robin_Watts | kens: yes, paul and I have booked already. | 13:21.51 |
| (Well, I have, paul was doing so as we spoke) | 13:22.01 |
kens | Working on mine now | 13:22.12 |
chrisl | And you got UA900/930 ? | 13:22.14 |
Robin_Watts | yes. | 13:22.25 |
chrisl | Okay, will go find my credit card..... | 13:22.39 |
kens | United web site is convinced I'm American.... | 13:23.10 |
chrisl | Top right, you can change your "language" | 13:24.03 |
kens | Ah I see economy plus is 'from' $105 and is actually $124 | 13:27.18 |
| Oh no, I take it back a middle row seat is only $118 | 13:27.43 |
chrisl | Yeh, and contrary to what I thought, there isn't extra elbow room - not bothering | 13:27.52 |
kens | exit rows are $145 | 13:28.03 |
| Even more expensive than delta...... | 13:28.17 |
chrisl | "Would I like to upgrade? $12,348 per person" - nah, not just now, thanks....... | 13:31.14 |
kens | LOL | 13:31.19 |
| Oooh Premier access fo $68.....If they could give me faster immigration I might be tempted.... | 13:32.06 |
Robin_Watts | I guarantee it won't. | 13:32.23 |
kens | Yeah I was being facetious | 13:32.31 |
Robin_Watts | It'll be 'faster at gates', but not security or immigration. | 13:32.47 |
kens | Indeed | 13:32.55 |
| ie pointless | 13:32.59 |
Robin_Watts | So, I've got twiki.ghostscript.com set up. | 13:33.15 |
| I've added webs for Ghostscript, MuPDF and GhostDocs. | 13:33.27 |
kens | will look after I finish the booking challenge | 13:33.30 |
Robin_Watts | and the GhostDocs stuff is currently only visible to users that I put in a specific group. | 13:33.46 |
| How much use it is all depends on how much people use it of course. | 13:34.05 |
chrisl | I thought we weren't doing a wiki for Ghostscript/MuPDF?? | 13:34.21 |
Robin_Watts | chrisl: Having set up the wiki, it cost me 2 minutes to add a web for those. | 13:34.54 |
| so it seemed silly not to. | 13:35.02 |
Jogux | robin_watts : awesome. are we going to import the existing picsel stuff into ghostdocs? (or perhaps better, as another module - it might be good to keep ghostdocs focussed on what /we/ care about) | 13:35.26 |
Robin_Watts | We can use it as a dumping ground for all sorts of stuff. Like cluster setup instructions, useful PS scripts etc. | 13:35.32 |
| Jogux: I was wondering that. | 13:35.38 |
| We could maybe make the GhostDocs web public and have a separate GhostDocsPrivate web with the old stuff in. | 13:36.02 |
| But I don't know how hard it is to import stuff. | 13:36.18 |
kens | Oh great, *NOW* It realises I'm in the UK and insists I start back at square one and deal in £ instead of $ | 13:36.35 |
Jogux | actually maybe there's three distinct areas: the old picsel stuff; stuff we need for smartoffice/fvdk/etc customers; stuff that actually relates to the final ghostdoc product. | 13:36.54 |
| robin_watts: I'm not sure either. :-S | 13:37.09 |
Robin_Watts | Jogux: I was still working on the assumption that we'd try and get the VM up and running. | 13:37.20 |
chrisl | kens: BTW, it looks like -dHaveTrueTypes=false isn't working as it should...... | 13:37.25 |
Robin_Watts | And then ssh tunnel so we can access that. | 13:37.42 |
kens | chrisl I can't even remember what that's supposed to do | 13:37.43 |
Jogux | robin_watts : ahhh. | 13:37.44 |
| that makes sense I think | 13:37.53 |
Robin_Watts | The old stuff all heavily assumes it's on intranet.picsel.com | 13:38.06 |
| and rewriting all the links seems hard work. | 13:38.16 |
chrisl | kens: in the ps2ps2 docs it says it converts TTFs to bitmaps fonts, but I just get inline images for the glyphs, no fonts at all | 13:38.29 |
kens | chrisl close enough :-) | 13:38.50 |
chrisl | kens: I have a CUPs buggy printer that I hoped it might be a workaround for, but I suspect it won't be usable like that :-( | 13:39.35 |
kens | Its probably somethgni to do with all the enormous amount of work that was involved with type 3 fonts and PCL/PXL including stick fonts and such | 13:40.16 |
chrisl | Well, *I* don't have the printer, it's a Ubuntu bug | 13:40.51 |
Jogux | robin_watts : interesting; didn't know that. I agree with the approach, anyway. assuming we can get the NAS back to life :-S | 13:41.04 |
kens | chrisl I can look at it, but let me finish booking first | 13:41.14 |
| Or I'll never get there | 13:41.23 |
| Stupid form just reset on me | 13:41.42 |
chrisl | kens: I just found out, haven't looked any further..... no rush, you have until September, at least! | 13:41.48 |
Robin_Watts | Jogux: It may simply be that there has been a power cut at Miles' and the NAS powered down. | 13:41.52 |
kens | may need that long at this ratge | 13:42.01 |
Jogux | robin_watts : possiblye; though points didn't lose power. | 13:42.38 |
Robin_Watts | UPS on the servers, but not the NAS maybe? | 13:42.51 |
chrisl | Robin_Watts: thing is, if we wanted a wiki, I'd have preferred to convert the entire website to a content managed setup....... | 13:43.01 |
Jogux | nods. possibly but you'd perhaps hope not :-) | 13:43.05 |
Robin_Watts | chrisl: The Picsel stuff has a large twiki, with lots of vital info in. | 13:43.48 |
| so I started to setup twiki with a view to importing that. | 13:44.01 |
| BUT it looks like it'll be slightly non trivial to get that all across into a new setup as it assumes the hostname it's running on. | 13:44.31 |
| An easier approach is to run the old VM (and more secure too) | 13:44.50 |
| but by the time I'd realised that I'd pretty much got the twiki set up, and tor (for one) seemed keen to have it anyway. | 13:45.20 |
| I think a TWiki would be a useful thing to have. For all those things like "how do I set up a cluster user?" (or maybe, "how do I do a release?") | 13:46.07 |
| and "how do I build MuPDF on android?" etc | 13:46.21 |
chrisl | We have docs for most of that stuff | 13:46.36 |
Robin_Watts | for some, certainly. | 13:46.57 |
henrys | Robin_Watts: we tried a FAQ for that and nobody contributed ⦠do you think we'd be more likely to contribute to a WIKI. | 13:47.57 |
chrisl | Things like how to builds shouldn't go on a wiki | 13:47.57 |
henrys | ? | 13:48.02 |
Robin_Watts | henrys: Yes. | 13:48.35 |
chrisl | doubts it | 13:48.47 |
Robin_Watts | chrisl: Why not? I would say that's exactly the kind of place where stuff should go. | 13:48.53 |
chrisl | Robin_Watts: how to build should be in the release archives | 13:49.18 |
Robin_Watts | If it's unused, we can remove it. | 13:49.19 |
kens | Thanks for putting me in on the email robin, saves me sending one to Miles. | 13:49.38 |
Jogux | henrys : I'd certainly contribute to any ghostdoc wiki | 13:50.11 |
kens | chrisl can you send me the file and command line ? | 13:50.17 |
Robin_Watts | chrisl: Right, but if I'm a user, and I hit problems with a build, and I solve them, I am more likely to edit a wiki to say | 13:50.21 |
| "I had problems here, and this is what I did to solve them" | 13:50.31 |
Jogux | and I was just about to say what Robin just said. | 13:50.34 |
chrisl | We're opening this to users? Oh god :-( | 13:50.39 |
Jogux | it needs a bit of curation for that kind of thing. | 13:50.44 |
chrisl | kens: I just chucked together a PS test, I'll you one after I have lunch | 13:51.19 |
kens | OK thanks | 13:51.29 |
kens | tries to remember what I was doing this morning before all this started | 13:51.46 |
spanners | wikis are cool, but can end up a mess of obsolete crud without careful curation | 13:54.01 |
henrys | spanners: careful curation does not seem to be one of our strong suits | 13:55.07 |
spanners | the drawer you have in your house with bits of wire, old string, papers, blu-tac, keys, mystery batteries | 13:55.19 |
| that's what a wiki is to a company | 13:55.30 |
| IMO :-) | 13:55.56 |
kens | thinks spanners just described Ghostscript | 13:58.52 |
henrys | Jogux, pedro_ :artifex normally has a staff meeting on IRC at 7:30 Pacific time, in 1/2 hour, if you guys want to attend that's great. If not can you give status to paulgardiner so he can discuss what's developed? | 14:00.28 |
kens | ermm, what's the time now ? | 14:00.43 |
kens | is still confused by time zones.... | 14:00.54 |
henrys | 7 pacific | 14:01.06 |
kens | OK 30 minutes then, thanks | 14:01.15 |
pedro_ | henrys: sure - we'll be here anyway | 14:02.07 |
henrys | Jogux: sot does not find my printers either, however if I write a very small client and run it with their library on linux - it works. Of course that is just using snmp, not bonjour | 14:03.55 |
| Jogux: doesn't find them on the ipad | 14:04.41 |
| Robin_Watts: I do think a wiki makes a lot of sense now, with folks getting up to speed they are very helpful. I don't know what sort of wisdom we would gain sharing it with the user base. | 14:07.38 |
tor8 | meeting in 25? | 14:07.53 |
kens | 23, 22... | 14:08.00 |
henrys | tor8: yes | 14:08.01 |
Jogux | marcosw_ : morning. the NAS doesn't seem to be reachable from points anymore - could you perhaps prod something? | 14:11.17 |
marcosw_ | Jogux: I'll give a look | 14:19.04 |
mvrhel_laptop | morning. I may be about 5 minutes late for our meeting... brb | 14:19.50 |
| morning. I may be about 5 minutes late for our meeting... brb | 14:19.56 |
kens | chrisl 8.81 emits the text as linework :-) | 14:22.00 |
| 8.71* | 14:22.07 |
| 9.00 emits a series of inline images | 14:23.10 |
chrisl | kens: in http://svn.ghostscript.com/ghostscript/tags/ghostscript-9.01/doc/Ps2pdf.htm#Options | 14:23.33 |
| "If not, TrueType fonts are converted into raster fonts with resolution specified in HWResolution" | 14:23.52 |
kens | chrisl yeah but I think that may not have been true for quite some time..... | 14:24.07 |
chrisl | Quite willing to believe that's wrong | 14:24.13 |
kens | I'm curious that 8.71 emits linework | 14:24.36 |
| But neither emits a 'font' as such | 14:24.45 |
| Possibly I could make it do so, but tis in a hairy complicated piece of code | 14:24.58 |
chrisl | Ho hum. It looks like some Toshiba printers have an issue with how ps2write emits TTFs :-( | 14:26.09 |
kens | Ah well, that's not entirely surprising | 14:26.26 |
| Given the way we emit TrueType fonts | 14:26.35 |
chrisl | I wondered it it might be down to the way some of the tables aren't regenerated for a subset, so I tried disallowing subset fonts...... | 14:27.17 |
| the opdfread code fails with the whole font | 14:27.34 |
kens | Oh.... | 14:27.40 |
chrisl | I assume it's expecting only <=255 glyphs | 14:27.56 |
kens | I would think that's likely yes | 14:28.13 |
| I had been thinking of looking at the TT font emission again, and fixing it so its right | 14:28.41 |
chrisl | Yeh, trouble is, I have no easy way to confirm if that's the problem | 14:29.08 |
kens | I haven't a clue, but there are other enhancements/bugs waiting on me to do that, so I need to sometime anyway. I take it the images work at least ? | 14:29.50 |
chrisl | I haven't sent the "image" file for him to try yet. I need to regenerate his test, and add all the printer specific crap to it | 14:30.40 |
kens | Hmm OK | 14:30.47 |
chrisl | I'll do it after the meeting | 14:31.25 |
kens | I'll see what I can do about a t3 font, maybe nothing | 14:31.48 |
henrys | chrisl, marcosw : so we're are we release wise? - I was sort of worried about those late pxl device changes by hin-tak and I'm not sure when pxl is tested (overnight). That's an important printer device for open source folks | 14:32.17 |
chrisl | henrys: those changes didn't do into the RC, so no problem there | 14:32.47 |
| s/do/go | 14:32.54 |
marcosw_ | marcosw: testing showed no significant differences, so we are good to go. | 14:33.38 |
henrys | chrisl: okay good for us but I think hin-tak will be disappointed, he was trying to get them in. | 14:33.57 |
| tor8: are you ready? | 14:34.08 |
chrisl | henrys: tough, frankly | 14:34.08 |
marcosw_ | seems to be talking to himself | 14:34.10 |
tor8 | henrys: yes, I'm back now. | 14:34.32 |
henrys | tor8: are you ready to release? | 14:34.48 |
tor8 | that's a trickier question | 14:35.00 |
| we just had some big merges, and I need to verify that nothing has broken with the various builds | 14:35.23 |
| but other than that, yes, I think we should be in good shape. paul might want to weigh in on the status of the ios port, and mvrhel on the winrt | 14:35.57 |
mvrhel_laptop | ok back | 14:37.05 |
henrys | tor8:but it sounds like you have a few more days and chrisl is ready to go with gs. chrisl can decide if he wants to hold off gs until you're ready. | 14:37.14 |
chrisl | As I'm half way through the release, I do not want to wai! | 14:37.37 |
| wait! | 14:37.40 |
tor8 | don't wait! mupdf should be ready for release within a week. | 14:38.00 |
| just make scott wait a few days with the newsletter | 14:38.23 |
henrys | mvrhel_laptop, paulgardiner anything stopping a mupdf release? | 14:39.24 |
mvrhel_laptop | no. everything is fine on the winrt side of things | 14:39.39 |
Robin_Watts | We need to fix the cluster. I'll try to do that later today. | 14:39.52 |
| and I'll rewind it so it can rerun those tests that have failed. | 14:40.16 |
paulgardiner | henrys: not that I'm aware of... well for iOS we were hoping to have Airprint. I could have a look at that. | 14:40.22 |
marcosw_ | Robin_Watts: is this the build target issue for nojs? I can fix that if you'd like | 14:40.30 |
tor8 | paulgardiner: if we can get airprint done this week, that would be very good to have in the release | 14:40.41 |
henrys | all:norbert will be using the cluster, if he comes around IRC (obviously) help him out | 14:40.47 |
Robin_Watts | marcosw_: That, plus whatever is stopping the mujstests working. | 14:40.55 |
tor8 | if not, we can make an app store release with airprint after the release (it's not like anybody builds the ios app from source...) | 14:41.04 |
| Robin_Watts: mujstest-v8 is renamed to just mujstest | 14:41.30 |
Robin_Watts | tor8: right. | 14:41.37 |
tor8 | marcosw: and there is no "all-nojs" target, just an "all" target | 14:41.55 |
henrys | tor8: so our domain isn't set yet? | 14:42.22 |
tor8 | ray_laptop needs to update the DNS to point mujs.com to casper | 14:42.39 |
| (or someone else who knows the DNS configuration) | 14:42.49 |
henrys | marcosw: I feel like there was a miscomm with guillaume, if there is some other way I should pass stuff to you let me know. | 14:43.03 |
| mvrhel_laptop: so how much more to do with gsview? | 14:43.43 |
marcosw_ | henrys: I think it was entirely my fault, I've been distracted the last week or so. | 14:43.47 |
ray_laptop | tor8: so there is ahttp://www.mujs.com page on casper ? | 14:43.53 |
Robin_Watts | ray_laptop: There is. | 14:44.00 |
tor8 | ray_laptop: yes, the web server should be all set up | 14:44.13 |
henrys | marcosw_: yeah that's no big deal I just wanted to know if there was something procedural that would make things easier for you. | 14:44.23 |
ray_laptop | Robin_Watts: OK. Right after we finish here, I'll dig into the DNS updates | 14:44.25 |
| tor8: thanks | 14:44.39 |
kens | chrisl as far as I can tell that documentation for 'HaveTrueTypes' is misleading, we never made a type 3 bitmap font. | 14:45.10 |
chrisl | kens: no surprise there | 14:45.28 |
kens | I'm not seeing an easy way to add it either.... | 14:45.58 |
mvrhel_laptop | henrys: I have to clean up some stuff on the hyperlinks today. Then I need to add just a couple more features (copy page to clipboard, select text, and saving out as with a few different mupdf types). This should not take much more than the rest of this week. Then there will be all the final little clean ups (adding a bit of help information, about information, and figuring out how we... | 14:46.00 |
| ...get it in the store) | 14:46.02 |
marcosw_ | Jogux: the NAS is back. There was a problem with the ip address. | 14:46.03 |
mvrhel_laptop | we have all the pdf flavor saving working (PDF-X, PDF-A etc). Also we can select regions of a page and save that region as a PS, PDF, EPS output | 14:46.59 |
chrisl | kens: I do find it infuriating that it should be so hard to use an already existing fallback case :-( | 14:47.01 |
kens | chrisl I'm not entirely certain that is an existing fallback, at least not now | 14:47.23 |
marcosw_ | henrys: I appreciate the offer but I think it's up to me to pay more attention. | 14:47.33 |
chrisl | kens: I thought any unrecognised font type would fall back to bitmap type 3 | 14:48.04 |
henrys | mvrhel_laptop: wow cool | 14:48.22 |
kens | to bitmap yes, but I'm unconvinced it falls back to a type 3 bitmap | 14:48.23 |
| We only seem to capture charprocs for type 3 fonts | 14:48.39 |
chrisl | kens: even for things like the stick font? | 14:48.52 |
kens | everything else seems to wind up as inline images | 14:48.56 |
| chrisl the stick font is specially handled, as a type 3 | 14:49.05 |
chrisl | Oh, oh well :-( | 14:49.29 |
kens | As are Microtype and HPGL fotns | 14:49.29 |
mvrhel_laptop | henrys: one weird thing that I am a little concerned about is that our XPS output creation is huge. not sure why. but we are using that for printing, so it may be worthwhile for one of us to spend a little time on this at some point later. | 14:49.37 |
henrys | paulgardiner: so I saved the best for the last 10 minutes, how is SOT ? ;-) | 14:50.16 |
mvrhel_laptop | oh is there a new git repository for SOT? | 14:50.33 |
henrys | mvrhel_laptop: yup that is my department, I'll try to get something on that soon before next week. | 14:50.34 |
mvrhel_laptop | I saw some discussion on the logs | 14:50.37 |
marcosw_ | Robin_Watts: i'll let you deal with the mupdf build issue on the cluster, tuesday is my day to go to uni, so I wouldn't be able to spend time on it until tonight. | 14:50.47 |
Robin_Watts | ok. | 14:50.55 |
Jogux | marcosw_ : awesome, many thanks | 14:50.58 |
paulgardiner | henrys: in headless chicken mode. | 14:51.06 |
mvrhel_laptop | :) | 14:51.15 |
Robin_Watts | mvrhel_laptop: There is, but hold off on it for now. | 14:51.15 |
marcosw_ | henrys: thanks for walking scott through the sot on iPad demo. | 14:51.15 |
mvrhel_laptop | robin_watts ok thanks | 14:51.23 |
Jogux | henrys : mace should be starting on ats setup tonight. | 14:51.33 |
henrys | marcosw_: oh how did that go? | 14:51.34 |
marcosw_ | henrys: not sure, I received an email from scott saying that I wouldn't be needed that you had sorted him out. | 14:52.05 |
henrys | paulgardiner: when mvrhel_laptop is done with gsview he wants to try his hand with SOT, it will be interesting to see how quickly someone completely new to the code can get up to speed. Though mvrhel_laptop is a quick study. | 14:53.16 |
paulgardiner | henrys: we got the builds out requested by a customer. I believe we have the iOS and Android builds for the apps working, so we could potentially do a release once we have regression testing up | 14:53.53 |
mvrhel_laptop | yes. I will be the sacrifice. | 14:54.05 |
pedro_ | mvrhel_laptop: good luck :) | 14:54.27 |
mvrhel_laptop | :) | 14:54.34 |
Jogux | hehe | 14:54.39 |
henrys | paulgardiner: we won't schedule releases this time. It goes when it's ready for now. | 14:55.26 |
Jogux | henrys : not sure if you saw when I said the other day, but it turns out the ATS VMs were not imaged from the actual working systems; there hence is some doubt about how complete they're going to be :-( | 14:55.29 |
paulgardiner | I've been meaning to take a look to see if the FBS already includes attempts towards Windows phone | 14:55.52 |
henrys | but I would like to get SOT on the regular march september schedule as the other products. | 14:56.03 |
Jogux | paulgardiner : I believe it does; but I also believe it's not finished. | 14:56.11 |
| henrys : in terms of releases to the appstore? | 14:56.35 |
Robin_Watts | Miles has been talking to an existing Picsel OEM. Interestingly someone that we'd tried to sell MuPDF too. Apparently they have licensed the PDF viewer from Picsel. | 14:56.37 |
| Rather than being a SmartOfficeLibrary customer like the one Paul was building for, they are an FVDK customer. | 14:57.07 |
| They get win32 and RVCT builds. | 14:57.15 |
Jogux | robin_watts : by my reckoning, all non-editting customers will be FVDK (pretty much) | 14:57.32 |
Robin_Watts | I fear we don't have an RVCT build machine anywhere. I was really hoping that would be part of the ATS VMs. | 14:57.46 |
| We need (possibly) RVCT 3.1 and 4.1 | 14:57.59 |
Jogux | robin_watts : I highly doubt it. However; I believe the licsenses are there | 14:58.07 |
Robin_Watts | ok. | 14:58.17 |
Jogux | (I forget where, but I'm sure I commented that I found them the other day) | 14:58.21 |
| ah, yes, I think there's a VM that I reckon is the ADS license server. | 14:58.28 |
henrys | Jogux: not necessarily app store every time. But a tagged release we can go back to would probably be useful. SOT is very different than ghostscript and mupdf and may not be served well by schedule releases. | 14:58.35 |
pedro_ | henrys: in terms of bugx/layout isue, we've been through debugging a number of issues in the documents and there are quite a number of individual issues there, broadly in 3 categories: bugs in bounding box calculations (leading to missing content), unsupported properties in XML graphics and a number of unimplemented parsing issues with layout attributes | 14:59.02 |
Jogux | henrys : nod. It may take a while for us to start to understand the requirements. I have no idea how many existing customers there are, what there requirements are, etc... | 14:59.19 |
paulgardiner | robin_watts have you mentioned your ideas of recreating picsel's intranet for us to access privately? | 14:59.35 |
pedro_ | we have a couple of issues fixed locally but would prefer to commit them when we have the ability to regression test through ats if possible (lots of scope to break things here) | 14:59.40 |
Jogux | henrys : A lot of the picsel customers historically tended to insist on fixes being made to ancient versions :-S | 14:59.41 |
Robin_Watts | paulgardiner: I've mentioned it on here, I can go over it again. | 14:59.54 |
henrys | pedro_: any bug fixes layout wise? Miles wants updates on that constantly. | 14:59.56 |
Robin_Watts | Picsel used to have an internal network, of which the 'hub' machine was intranet.picsel.com | 15:00.27 |
Jogux | I have absolutely no idea when ATS will be up btw; probably a reasonable chance by Monday next week. I'm likening it to trying to tame a feral kitten (something I'm also trying to do just now) | 15:00.45 |
paulgardiner | robin_watts I just thinking that it might give us easy access to various info that is difficult at the moment, even perhaps the vm setups | 15:00.55 |
Jogux | oh, that reminds me, I need to sync the old intranet VM onto the new ATS boxes. | 15:01.11 |
henrys | Jogux: I think we are likely to push back on that unless it is a big player. | 15:01.18 |
Robin_Watts | I think a good way to proceed would be to run the intranet.picsel.com VM (and others) within marcosw's garage. | 15:01.25 |
| Possibly on a separate subnet. | 15:01.34 |
| With no access from the internet. | 15:01.41 |
Jogux | henrys : That was exactly picsel's policy. though their definition of "big player" was fairly random :-) | 15:01.55 |
henrys | Jogux: we've only talked to a few customers and they seem to be happy we're just speaking to them ;-( so I'm not sure how high the bar is. | 15:02.13 |
paulgardiner | pedro_: if you push your changes to your casper repo, I can try to rebase them onto the new epage+resources repo, unless your happier doing it yourself | 15:02.17 |
Robin_Watts | Then we can run an ssh tunnel through one of the machines at marcosw's house, and access the intranet securely from where we are. | 15:02.27 |
Jogux | henrys : :-) | 15:02.33 |
paulgardiner | I'm trying to move everything esle across between those repos at the moment | 15:02.45 |
Jogux | henrys : tbf the worst were the japanese mobile phone OEMs; I think there are a lot fewer of them these days ;-) | 15:02.54 |
kens | chrisl can you think of a test file with a CIDFont in it offhand ? | 15:03.03 |
chrisl | kens: type11withvmtx2.pdf | 15:04.01 |
pedro_ | henrys: some of the missing images (although not all) and a missing header/footer style parsing change (although I'm still testing them on different docs). There are inconsistencies depending howthe document was created and/or saved (eg saving in compatible mode xml is less well supported than saving in 'new' xml) | 15:04.02 |
kens | CHRISL OK THANKS | 15:04.07 |
ray_laptop | kens: Or tests_private/comparefiles/HeiseiMinStd.pdf ? | 15:04.47 |
chrisl | kens: or japan-.pdf is even simpler | 15:04.52 |
pedro_ | paulgardiner: I'm happy to push the changes; I'd just like to be able to regression test for a getter level of confidence | 15:04.53 |
kens | ONLY NEEDS ONE :-) | 15:04.55 |
paulgardiner | pedro_: yeah, we can hold off pushing them to the main repo until then | 15:05.30 |
henrys | the meeting always ends, officially, after 1/2 hour. Usually folks stick around after though, mainly for Jogux and pedro_ | 15:05.57 |
ray_laptop | kens: has capslock stuck :-) | 15:06.04 |
kens | Yeah, happens all the time | 15:06.15 |
pedro_ | nods - we're not going anywhere ;) | 15:06.17 |
Jogux | pedro_ : tbf I think the first step in the ATS bring up will be testing on the tree as we got it from Picsel, so we will then later explicitly test it with any changes that have been made. we may need to do that in stages as robin already changed the layout of everything :-) | 15:06.19 |
ray_laptop | or it's noisy in his house and he has to shout to be heard | 15:06.31 |
pedro_ | jogux: sure | 15:06.34 |
Robin_Watts | Jogux: none of my changes are in the new repo yet. | 15:08.42 |
| If ATS is going to be up by next monday, then we can test what we were given, then re-apply changes one commit at a time. | 15:09.25 |
kens | ray_laptop : no the noise is finished now, the chainsaws are gone | 15:09.32 |
paulgardiner | Jogux: at this stage we probably don't care if, for the sake of testing, we have to reset the main repo back to as we received it, provided we keep our updates on a repo somewhere | 15:09.38 |
ray_laptop | kens: so did the patient survive the surgery ? | 15:10.04 |
paulgardiner | Oh I suppose the new sot.git is as we received it | 15:10.22 |
kens | ray_laptop : this week, yes, but the tree will be saying goodbye to its friends soon | 15:10.26 |
henrys | pedro_: so for these bug fixes does the bugzilla workflow work okay for you? | 15:11.14 |
Jogux | robin_watts , paulgardiner : nah, I'd just go ahead and get the repository sane; we can use tags/shas/wahtever to give ATS exactly what we want it to test. | 15:11.44 |
Jogux | is sacrificing points's upstream to the ATS gods again; feel free to kill it if it's affecting anyone. | 15:12.37 |
| it'll probably take beyond Monday to get ATS + git playing together properly, but I really hope we can at least run tests by then. | 15:13.33 |
pedro_ | henrys: yeah, its fine although I'm effectively working across a number of the bugs simultaneously just now as each docuemnt contains a number of distinct issues. I'm trying to find common issues, but I could raise specific bugs based on the root cause if thats more useful? | 15:13.35 |
paulgardiner | pedro_: that sounds sensible to me. | 15:15.44 |
henrys | pedro_: we like to have a bug fix commit associated with a bug number in bugzilla - the number referenced in the log. So if that demands a new bug, that's fine, then you can close other bugs as being fixed by the other fix. | 15:15.52 |
| pedro_: the bug number should be somewhere in the commit log | 15:16.22 |
pedro_ | henrys: cool - as it stands I think we'll have a number of fixes for each of the existing documents, so I'll make sure they all reference the appropriate fixes. | 15:18.16 |
henrys | pedro_: bugzilla's resolved as a duplicate functionality seems like it might be fitting for many of your cases. | 15:19.32 |
pedro_ | nods | 15:19.57 |
henrys | how does one pronounce the name Iain banks - ee ah in? | 15:23.38 |
chrisl | Just like Ian | 15:23.54 |
henrys | chrisl: thanks, as soon as shift is done I'm diving in. | 15:24.27 |
paulgardiner | ee un I reckon | 15:24.45 |
henrys | early death, very sad. | 15:26.12 |
pedro_ | iirc its the Gaelic equivalent of John | 15:26.16 |
| henrys: indeed | 15:26.22 |
henrys | paulgardiner: in the states it would be Ian, that medial 'i' had me wondering | 15:29.26 |
kens | Its a Gaelic spelling | 15:29.50 |
Robin_Watts | We have both Ian's and Iain's here. | 15:30.05 |
ray_laptop | almost as confused as french spellings | 15:30.10 |
paulgardiner | I think it was the first time I'd seen that spelling too | 15:30.52 |
pedro_ | paulgardiner: its the norm up here :) | 15:31.14 |
chrisl | I never met anyone called Norm..... | 15:31.31 |
pedro_ | oddly enough neitherhave I | 15:31.47 |
ray_laptop | OK. For mujs.com which of you transferred it to us, and who manages the domain ? godaddy or network solutions ? | 15:31.48 |
paulgardiner | Nothing is normal up there :-) | 15:31.50 |
Robin_Watts | ray_laptop: Neither of us transferred it to us. | 15:32.12 |
pedro_ | paulgardiner: you're not wrong ;) | 15:32.16 |
Robin_Watts | ray_laptop: Miles did the deal for the domain. We've not heard anything more. | 15:32.38 |
ray_laptop | I wasn't in the loop on the purchase of it (Miles took care of it) | 15:32.50 |
| last I heard from Miles was "It's done. I'll forward the info to Ray when I get the confirmation." | 15:33.26 |
| seems like I need to contact Miles | 15:33.45 |
chrisl | pedro_: The father of a school friend of mine would correct your spelling of his name to whichever of Ian/Iain you hadn't used - drove us nuts :-) | 15:33.54 |
Robin_Watts | ray_laptop: Right, that's why we assumed you'd know. Sorry. | 15:33.59 |
pedro_ | chrisl: excellent idea. Just need to do the same with Ian/iain/Eoin/John... | 15:34.47 |
Robin_Watts | Henceforth I shall be Robyn | 15:35.16 |
chrisl | I think I'll stick to Chris..... | 15:36.06 |
tor8 | pedro_: don't forget Jon and Jan | 15:38.27 |
pedro_ | tor8: ah - forgot. I think there are enough variants for us all to adopt one ;) | 15:39.10 |
tor8 | and Johan | 15:39.13 |
pedro_ | and Ewan and Owen | 15:39.46 |
chrisl | Owain..... | 15:39.59 |
ray_laptop | and Jean | 15:53.11 |
Robin_Watts | tor8: Did you change the NOX11 stuff in the mupdf makefiles ? | 15:54.48 |
tor8 | Robin_Watts: yeah. HAVE_X11=no is the now NOX11 | 15:55.01 |
| s/now/new/ | 15:55.08 |
Robin_Watts | ok. | 15:55.31 |
kens | chrisl I'm momentarily at a loss, the CIDFOnt code does fall back to a type 3 font, I can't for the life of me see why the TT code doesn't. | 16:02.18 |
| OIf course, I can't actually see where the Type 3 gets built in the CIDFont case either.... | 16:02.38 |
Robin_Watts | mvrhel_laptop: I've just pushed the lcms 2.6 import to golden. | 16:03.13 |
| If you want to play with making lcms2 use it's threading stuff, feel free. | 16:03.36 |
kens | chrisl norbert is quick off the mark there.... | 16:03.36 |
mvrhel_laptop | robin_watts: ok great. thanks | 16:03.44 |
chrisl | kens: the CIDFont always falls back to type 3 | 16:04.18 |
kens | chrisl yes, in ps2write | 16:04.26 |
| But the path is the same as the TT font with no HaveTrueTypes, yet the CIDFont 'works' (creates t3) and the TT case doesn't. Currently bafled by that | 16:05.01 |
chrisl | Strange - I'd assumed it would be the usual totally separate logic for two almost identical functions..... | 16:05.39 |
kens | chrisl, no because I wrote (or heavily modified) most of this | 16:05.59 |
| THere is something different, clearly, but I can't see it at the moment | 16:06.18 |
tkamppeter | chrisl, should we not mention on http://www.ghostscript.com/doc/current/News.htm that we have now a new "pwgraster" output device for PWG Raster output and support for PPD-less printing? My commits of 2013-11-27 and 2013-12-19. | 16:07.11 |
chrisl | tkamppeter: too late, the release it done | 16:07.34 |
| tkamppeter: unfortunately, those news pages are included in the release archives, so it would mean repeating the release process - sorry | 16:09.25 |
tkamppeter | chrisl, thought that this is only web site stuff, but never mind, it is enough that I know it personally as I am the only direct user of it. End users use it only through cups-filters. | 16:09.50 |
chrisl | tkamppeter: I'll make a note to put a retrospective announcement in the next release - I do think it worthy of note | 16:10.38 |
Robin_Watts | Jogux, pedro, paulgardiner: Any idea what IAPT is ? | 16:11.40 |
paulgardiner | none sorry | 16:11.58 |
Jogux | I think it's something like internal alien porting team | 16:12.44 |
| what exactly it does to the build I can't remember | 16:13.01 |
| in which context are you seeing/worrying about it? :) | 16:13.08 |
tkamppeter | chrisl, OK. | 16:13.27 |
Robin_Watts | Jogux: I've found an FVDK build line, so I'm having a go at it. and it mentioned -iapt | 16:14.24 |
| and it saying "Using IAPT clean room" which sounded very exciting :) | 16:14.41 |
Jogux | oo, neat. | 16:14.50 |
paulgardiner | print "Using IAPT clean room" os.system("rm *") | 16:17.05 |
Jogux | I /think/ it means it's using a different, cleaner, version of the alien app. maybe. | 16:17.41 |
pedro_ | the IAPT was basically just an external reference application model (reference apps we could supply to customers along with the picselwin lib) | 16:18.42 |
Robin_Watts | OK. We'll see what it spits out at the end. | 16:19.03 |
pedro_ | apps are in epage/alien-reference-applications | 16:19.32 |
Robin_Watts | They have listed 2 specific problems with the PDF agent, so I guess I ought to look at those. | 16:19.35 |
Jogux | ahha. I believe the iapt stuff essentially means "use the alien in epage/alien-reference-applications" (ie. not the platform/tgv/apps/windows-alien etc) | 16:21.08 |
| seems to cover linuxfb/linuxqtk/linuxgtk/win32. | 16:21.47 |
marcosw | chrisl: is there a reason we are skipping 9.13 as a release? | 16:21.54 |
Robin_Watts | 13! | 16:22.02 |
kens | voodoo numbers | 16:22.17 |
Robin_Watts | We'll be skipping 9.370 too. | 16:22.18 |
chrisl | marcosw: I was just making the point about 13 (after skipping 9.11) | 16:22.20 |
pedro_ | Robin_Watts> think they only build with vs2005 at present | 16:22.26 |
Jogux | oh, and activex. Paul_Gardiner will be ecstatic :) | 16:22.37 |
Robin_Watts | vs2005 is my preferred vs. | 16:22.40 |
marcosw | robin_watts 9.370? | 16:22.40 |
| what about 9.666? | 16:22.50 |
Robin_Watts | marcosw: It's the malaysian version. | 16:23.08 |
kens | will be retired by the time we get to 666 | 16:23.18 |
paulgardiner | Jogux: that must have died surely | 16:23.32 |
ray_laptop | actually, gs only supports 2 digit minor numbers | 16:24.13 |
Jogux | paulgardiner> last change in 2012. so maybe :) | 16:24.51 |
marcosw | if we plan on selling to china we can't have a 3 in the release number at all (or is it 4?, I can't keep track). I do know that 8 is a good thing, which is why United flight Bejing -> SFO is UA888. | 16:24.57 |
Robin_Watts | 4 is bad. | 16:26.07 |
kens | Robin_Watts : are you aware the cluster is still failing ? | 16:27.24 |
Robin_Watts | kens: I am :( | 16:27.36 |
kens | Ah, OK then | 16:27.46 |
Robin_Watts | tor8: The cluster is having trouble building cmapdump. | 16:31.24 |
| If I'm reading the makefiles correctly, we only build it if CROSSCOMPILE == yes now ? | 16:31.58 |
| or actually, maybe never build it at all. | 16:33.12 |
| I think the CROSSCOMPILE logic is screwed. I'd be in favour of a force-push to fix this, otherwise we are going to have a long series of broken tests in the cluster, some of which we could really do with having had tested. | 16:39.58 |
tor8 | Robin_Watts: oh yeah. there's a fix for the CROSSCOMPILE error later. | 16:40.34 |
| feel free to rebase and squash it into the right place so we can test the lot | 16:40.50 |
| Robin_Watts: aaab0da Fix typo in Makefile. | 16:41.24 |
Robin_Watts | ok. | 16:42.02 |
chrisl | bbl | 16:51.24 |
Robin_Watts | Ok, let's hope that these tests now run through. | 16:52.19 |
kens | finally finds the place where the type 3 character gets built for CIDFonts | 16:55.19 |
| OK in the TrueType case our bitmap has no ID< so we don't know its a character, that's why its not coming through in a type 3 font. | 16:56.21 |
| Aha! | 16:57.48 |
| Its being rendered uncached by FAPI | 16:57.57 |
| THat's the casue chrisl | 16:58.03 |
| we genuinely don't make fonts for uncached glyphs | 16:58.45 |
Guest10482 | chrisl, for information, I build from source a new pcl6.exe and now it is working... | 17:12.15 |
Robin_Watts | Hi zeniko. | 17:13.11 |
| I'm afraid there has been some force pushing on the mupdf repo because the import of mujs broke our regression tests. | 17:13.52 |
| The new tests are hopefully running through now. | 17:14.06 |
zeniko | Robin_Watts: no worries, I just haven't figured out how to convince git to rebaes my patches on top of the new HEAD | 17:15.39 |
Robin_Watts | Also, we (well, I) changed the implementation of streams in order to allow us to do processing at the operator level. | 17:15.52 |
zeniko | Robin_Watts: in case you're not quite done with the release yet, there's two more simple patches on zeniko/mupdf and one openjpeg one on zeniko/ghostpdl (in case you're not going to use openjpeg 2.1) | 17:16.19 |
Robin_Watts | zeniko: We haven't started the release yet. Getting the tests working was kind of a prerequesite for that :) | 17:16.54 |
| henrys: Can you look at the openjpeg fix on zeniko/ghostpdl? | 17:17.19 |
| The two fixes on zeniko/master look fine. I will pull those in, thanks. | 17:18.58 |
kens | chrisl seems that we reduce the resolution to 72 dpi when creating the cached bitmap for CIDFonts (!!) and this is why the caching works for that, but not for TT fonts, because those get rendered at 720 dpi and are too big for the cache | 17:25.32 |
| All I need to do now is find out where the 72 dpi gets set. Alternatively, try running wth -r72 | 17:25.55 |
| For me that produces a font | 17:26.53 |
| Should be good enough for testing prposes | 17:27.03 |
| I'll look into the resolution thing tomorrow, in the meantime I've had enough for one day, goodnight folks | 17:28.16 |
ray_laptop | bye, kens | 17:28.55 |
Robin_Watts | tor8: ping | 17:28.56 |
| tor8: The first of the cluster tests just passed. Hopefully we'll run through quite quickly now. | 17:29.39 |
| But 1 file is looking different in the mupdf test run of the mujs commit. | 17:30.12 |
| tests_private/pdf/sumatra/1503_-_support_form_text_fields.pdf at all resolutions/bandings. | 17:30.29 |
mvrhel_laptop | I am having trouble rebasing to golden | 17:39.10 |
| something funky with the mujs stuff | 17:39.23 |
| robin_watts; is there something different that I need to do? | 17:39.35 |
Robin_Watts | mvrhel_laptop: Yes, we had to force push, unfortunately. | 17:39.53 |
mvrhel_laptop | oh | 17:39.59 |
Robin_Watts | How many commits do you have? | 17:40.14 |
mvrhel_laptop | all the commits that I have to rebase are in my branch, there are a lot of them | 17:40.48 |
| but they are contained in the winRT folder | 17:41.01 |
Robin_Watts | mvrhel_laptop: Can you push your branch onto your private repo please? | 17:41.26 |
mvrhel_laptop | right now my master is in a conflicted state | 17:41.44 |
Robin_Watts | Then I'll pull it down, do the necessary, and then push it back up for you to grab. | 17:41.47 |
| git rebase --abort | 17:41.54 |
mvrhel_laptop | ok. let me push what I have then | 17:42.15 |
| robin_watts: ok. so the win_desktop branch has all the commits | 17:43.59 |
Robin_Watts | OK, give me 2 mins to finish this email | 17:44.14 |
mvrhel_laptop | my master seems to have veered off from golden according to what I can see, hopefully you can fix that too | 17:45.21 |
Robin_Watts | OK, to fix master... git checkout master && git reset --hard HEAD~100 && git pull --rebase golden master | 17:49.16 |
| That changes you onto master, throws away the top 100 commits, then pulls in the new stuff. | 17:49.33 |
mvrhel_laptop | ok | 17:52.38 |
Robin_Watts | OK, so robin/win_desktop should have your changes on. | 17:54.59 |
mvrhel_laptop | robin_watts: ok thank you | 17:55.11 |
Robin_Watts | to pull that in, you probably want to: git checkout win_desktop && git pull --rebase robin win_desktop | 17:55.41 |
mvrhel_laptop | ok I have my master here and on my repos back in sync with golden | 17:58.06 |
Robin_Watts | fab. | 17:59.03 |
| sorry about that. | 17:59.10 |
mvrhel_laptop | robin_watts: so you did not push your changes into my repos? | 18:02.43 |
| just so I understand | 18:02.50 |
Robin_Watts | I can't push into your repo. | 18:02.56 |
mvrhel_laptop | ok | 18:03.00 |
Robin_Watts | All I can do is make it available so that you can pull it into yours. | 18:03.26 |
| The main repo is set up as "shared", so it's slightly different. We can all push to that. | 18:03.59 |
mvrhel_laptop | ugh. this is a mess | 18:05.55 |
Robin_Watts | ? | 18:07.36 |
| Are you having trouble pulling my changed version in? | 18:08.09 |
| If the git pull --rebase isn't working, then we can use a hammer and do it in 2 commands. | 18:08.31 |
mvrhel_laptop | yes. I may have already used the hammer but I am not sure I did it correctly | 18:08.46 |
| hold on | 18:09.02 |
Robin_Watts | Well, first, let's back out of the rebase. | 18:09.10 |
| git rebase --abort | 18:09.13 |
mvrhel_laptop | hold on | 18:09.17 |
Jogux | he's gone to get the chainsaw ;) | 18:09.48 |
mvrhel_laptop | its odd there are a couple commits from Simon that you stuck in there that I dont see in the head | 18:10.04 |
| or the master that is | 18:10.11 |
| perhaps I had not pulled those in yet | 18:10.46 |
| may have just missed them | 18:10.50 |
Robin_Watts | Yeah, they went in very recently. | 18:11.24 |
mvrhel_laptop | ok. I think I have it all fixed now | 18:12.15 |
Robin_Watts | fab. | 18:12.56 |
mvrhel_laptop | yes. ok everything looks good | 18:13.33 |
| thanks robin_watts | 18:13.36 |
Robin_Watts | no worries | 18:13.59 |
mvrhel_laptop | robin_watts one question for you | 18:14.02 |
| for some reason the jpeg folder in the submodule keeps thinking it is modified | 18:14.40 |
| or openjpeg that is | 18:14.47 |
| is there any special command I can do to zap it back to its senses | 18:15.07 |
Robin_Watts | git submodule update --init ? | 18:15.28 |
| Whenever you update you should do that, in case someone has changed the thirdparty submodules. | 18:16.08 |
mvrhel_laptop | right. I have everything updated there | 18:16.20 |
| its weird. next time we are together I will show you | 18:16.45 |
| it is not a major issue | 18:16.51 |
Robin_Watts | henrys: What's our luratech jpx decoder license? | 18:23.37 |
| Can I pull it into epage? | 18:23.44 |
| or would that require license fees? | 18:23.58 |
paulgardiner | At last! ~paulg/private-repos/sot.git has the new combined epage/resources repo with our own commits rebased across (at least everything I could find in the epage repos on casper) | 18:50.33 |
Robin_Watts | paulgardiner: Excellent! | 18:51.08 |
Jogux | paul: woot. cloning now :) | 18:51.31 |
| paul: btw, did you use some clever method to copy between the two trees? | 18:51.49 |
paulgardiner | git rebase -s subtree | 18:52.08 |
Robin_Watts | Probably we should review all the commits before just pulling them across willy nilly. | 18:52.39 |
paulgardiner | But it fails on commits that only create files, so also some fiddling | 18:52.55 |
Robin_Watts | I'm sure there are some of mine in there that would benefit from another look. | 18:53.01 |
| paulgardiner: An alternative would have been to: git format-patch HEAD~10 (or however many), then edit the paths in the patches and reapply. | 18:53.36 |
paulgardiner | robin_watts that's why I stuck them just on my repo, so people have access to them but without them goint to the main repo | 18:53.45 |
Jogux | paul : that seems clever :-) | 18:53.59 |
paulgardiner | robin_watts that might have been easier, to be honest | 18:54.06 |
Robin_Watts | so people should treat: /home/git-private/sot.git as the golden repo. | 18:54.18 |
Jogux | does format-patch cope with binary files? | 18:54.32 |
paulgardiner | Although most of the hassle with both methods is navigating the huge tree | 18:54.34 |
Robin_Watts | Jogux: IIRC, yes. | 18:54.40 |
Jogux | neat | 18:54.44 |
paulgardiner | robin_watts that's worrying. I'm fetching from the main repo again with the addition of --tags and receiving a lot of new objects | 19:01.34 |
Jogux | which 'main' repo? :) | 19:02.02 |
paulgardiner | :-) /home/git-private/sot.git | 19:02.46 |
| golden, as we call it | 19:02.57 |
Robin_Watts | Jogux: paulgardiner did a conversion step earlier (to remove CVSROOT) and didn't use "--tag-name-filter cat" | 19:03.27 |
| We looked, and it didn't seem like there was a problem with the created repo. | 19:03.48 |
| All the tags looked to be in the correct places. | 19:03.55 |
Jogux | ah, neat / weird. | 19:04.12 |
Robin_Watts | But if we were redoing the process, I'd add that back in. | 19:04.27 |
paulgardiner | It's probably fine. Perhaps there a few tags not on branches | 19:04.34 |
Jogux | uh, I just cloned ghostscript.com:/home/paulg/private-repos/sot.git - what's the /home/git-private/sot.git one? | 19:04.45 |
paulgardiner | ... if you see what I mean | 19:04.48 |
Robin_Watts | Jogux: The /home/git-private/sot.git one is the golden repo. It's the one that pauls one is based on. | 19:05.11 |
paulgardiner | Jogux: call the first paul and the second golden | 19:05.14 |
Robin_Watts | paul = golden + our commits. | 19:05.26 |
Jogux | right. thanks :) | 19:05.32 |
paulgardiner | Also in the future, paul will be where I push things for safe keeping and for people to look at for review | 19:05.58 |
Robin_Watts | Any commit to golden should probably be subject to our informal review system from now on. | 19:06.02 |
paulgardiner | Weird. fetching tags has pulled in a load of commits that start "Summary:". Even if my CVSROOT removal was wrong, it shouldn't have made those reappear. | 19:10.17 |
Jogux | paul : have I forgotten the name of the tag for the android build you did last week, or has it vanished? | 19:10.41 |
paulgardiner | Not sure. I don't seem to have your tag either | 19:11.43 |
Jogux | I suspect anything you did with rebase -s has lost the tags :-S | 19:12.07 |
Robin_Watts | I don't think we were expecting tags to be copied across from epage.git to sot.git | 19:12.17 |
Jogux | robin_watts : yes :-) | 19:12.25 |
Robin_Watts | but all the tags that were in sot.git already should still be there. | 19:12.37 |
paulgardiner | Ah yes, of course. I realised that earlier and forgot. | 19:13.13 |
Jogux | :-) | 19:13.18 |
paulgardiner | But still there is something strange going on with tags | 19:13.26 |
Jogux | so I guess we just manually put those tags back on? | 19:13.26 |
paulgardiner | Jogux: yep | 19:13.37 |
| Ah no sorry, ignore me. The repo is fine | 19:16.09 |
| Too tired | 19:16.18 |
| I swapped back to the combined repo by accident | 19:16.37 |
Jogux | yeah, too many repos just now :-) | 19:16.53 |
paulgardiner | Yeah. All looks fine, other than the need to recreate our recent tags, as you said | 19:18.16 |
tor8 | Robin_Watts: 6801564 fix warnings in fitz/printf.c breaks linux builds | 19:18.45 |
Robin_Watts | tor8: oh, ass. | 19:19.38 |
| Do you have a fix ? | 19:19.43 |
tor8 | -#if _MSC_VER < 1800 | 19:19.56 |
| +#if defined(_MSC_VER) && _MSC_VER < 1800 | 19:19.57 |
Robin_Watts | Want to push that to tor/master, and I'll review it, and we can push it out? | 19:20.21 |
| We can live without force pushing that and causing michael more hassle as it's the last one we pushed. | 19:20.50 |
tor8 | Robin_Watts: we have the same basic ifdef but just _MSC_VER in fitz/buffer.c | 19:22.15 |
| so maybe we should just fix the underlying problem with some macros in fitz.h | 19:22.29 |
Robin_Watts | tor8: That might be nicer. | 19:23.03 |
tor8 | I'll bash on that and give you a commit to review in 5 minutes | 19:23.15 |
Robin_Watts | ok. | 19:24.05 |
tor8 | Robin_Watts: okay, va_copy ifdef fix on tor/master | 19:30.38 |
| please double check that it builds on win32 | 19:30.51 |
| have you bmpcmped mujs difference that you mentioned? | 19:31.36 |
Robin_Watts | tor8: Why do we use va_copy_end rather than just va_end ? | 19:32.00 |
tor8 | Robin_Watts: because in c89, va_end belongs to va_start, and there is no va_copy | 19:32.23 |
| in c99, if you do va_copy, you must also va_end | 19:32.30 |
Robin_Watts | Right, so why do we define a va_copy_end? | 19:32.51 |
| Can't we just call va_end, and if it doesn't exist, define it. | 19:33.05 |
tor8 | so that on c89 we can do ap=old_ap and *not* call va_end | 19:33.06 |
| and in c99 that becomes va_copy and va_copy_end | 19:33.14 |
| doing ap=old_ap and then calling va_end would be wrong | 19:33.34 |
Robin_Watts | ok. | 19:33.40 |
tor8 | and we still have places where we va_start and need to call va_end | 19:33.44 |
Robin_Watts | looks good to me, but I haven't tested it yet. | 19:33.59 |
| Just a mo. | 19:34.00 |
tor8 | now we could probably get away with doing ap=old_ap and never call va_copy | 19:34.05 |
Robin_Watts | tor8: have you done a windows build of mujs before? | 19:39.25 |
| warning city arizona. | 19:39.31 |
| and you appear to be calling naked realloc and not checking the results :( | 19:40.06 |
| but that fix commit works. Shall I push it? | 19:41.11 |
| pushed | 19:41.49 |
| There are 5 instances of naked realloc in jscompile.c. I suspect they should be js_realloc ? | 19:44.03 |
| tor8: Let me try to fix the warnings as I'm on windows. | 19:54.33 |
henrys | yikes bugzilla is almost unusable, Jogux much more to do? | 20:14.04 |
Robin_Watts | tor8: Various reviews for you then. | 20:15.19 |
Jogux | henrys: urrr. bugzilla is hosted at Miles's office? | 20:18.38 |
henrys | visual studio'er ⦠any idea why the intellisense data base won't write to a shared directory, it says no permission - but it converts the makefile and writes to the directory. maybe no permission to create a directory. | 20:19.19 |
Robin_Watts | Bugzilla was on casper, but it was too much of a load for the instance. So we moved it. | 20:19.24 |
henrys | Jogux: yes | 20:19.25 |
Jogux | also, my rsync finished 4 hours ago :-) | 20:19.27 |
| henrys : okay. didn't know that; I shall try and find an appropriate bwlimit next time. but I don't think the current issue you see is my fault :-) | 20:20.04 |
Robin_Watts | henrys: Usually that kind of thing is because of having 2 copies of vs open on the same project at once. | 20:20.37 |
| otherwise I'd suggest rebooting and trying again? | 20:20.47 |
| Unless miles has hit the fair usage limit or something and is now being throttled? (dunno if there is one, but...) | 20:21.20 |
| Or maybe marcosw is copying stuff? | 20:21.34 |
henrys | bugzilla is okay now don't know what happened. | 20:22.41 |
marcosw_ | wasn't me, I wasn't using an appreciable portion of miles' bandwidth. and as far as I know being a business account there is no limit. | 20:35.56 |
| there is a twice a day mysqldump that locks the bugzilla database for a couple of minutes, but that happens at 6:00am and 6:00pm PDT. | 20:37.31 |
tor8 | Robin_Watts: oops, re the naked reallocs | 21:09.21 |
Robin_Watts | tor8: easy mistake, simple fix. see my repos. | 21:09.40 |
| Am I right in thinking that you're using a fixed size exception stack? | 21:10.29 |
| Isn't that a bit risky? | 21:10.38 |
| Could someone deliberately arrange for something heavily recursive to blow it? | 21:10.56 |
tor8 | Robin_Watts: yes. if we run out of exception stack space, we throw a stack overflow error | 21:11.07 |
Robin_Watts | Is that the ->panic() thing ? | 21:11.40 |
tor8 | the panic thing what happens if we throw an exception without a try around it | 21:12.06 |
| normally you'll call js_dostring or js_pcall which are 'protected' calls that have a try | 21:12.26 |
Robin_Watts | right. | 21:12.35 |
tor8 | but if you get an error while setting up your native bindings or something like that, you could end up with an exception being thrown without the try protection | 21:13.05 |
Robin_Watts | I see that fz_malloc etc throw in the failure case. | 21:13.06 |
tor8 | that's when panic gets called | 21:13.08 |
Robin_Watts | ah, i see. | 21:13.22 |
| cunning. | 21:13.27 |
| You've not got any fz_var equivalents in there. | 21:13.42 |
tor8 | shouldn't be necessary, the way I've structured the code | 21:14.04 |
| fz_var equivalents, i.e. | 21:14.10 |
Robin_Watts | Is that because nothing is in local vars? It's always members being written to? | 21:14.18 |
tor8 | anything risky always lives on the stack, and any local vars are read-only after the try | 21:14.30 |
Robin_Watts | makes sense. | 21:14.40 |
| There are 4 warnings that I didn't fix. | 21:14.56 |
| to do with reallocing things that are const char **'s. | 21:15.06 |
tor8 | I do: a=malloc(); if (try()) { free(a); } ... stuff that uses a...; free(a); endtry(); | 21:15.12 |
| oh yeah, void* and const behaves oddly with warnings on MSVC :( | 21:15.29 |
Robin_Watts | no, the problem is that you can't realloc a const char ** on any platform :) | 21:15.57 |
| or at least, you shouldn't be able to. | 21:16.08 |
| being called for food, I gotta go, sorry! | 21:16.20 |
tor8 | I hope you mean "char * const *" not being reallocable | 21:16.30 |
| Robin_Watts: clang and gcc are annoying with -Wunreachable-code | 21:18.06 |
| clang warns about the abort sections you added, and without them gcc warns instead | 21:18.31 |
| but gcc has a broken -Wunreachable-code anyway :( | 21:18.43 |
Jogux | I thought gcc made -Wunreachable-code a no-op in the latest versions? | 21:21.23 |
| ( http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2011-05/msg00360.html ) | 21:22.30 |
mvrhel_laptop | ok. some nice page copy and paste stuff added to gsview | 21:32.38 |
aleray | Is it possible to convert gsf font files to something else like type 1? | 21:39.19 |
henrys | Jogux:are you in contact with mace? You said something earlier about test setup. Just got off the phone to Miles and he would like the web site changes to be the high priority thing. | 21:48.32 |
Jogux | henrys : I shall pass that on | 21:48.57 |
henrys | Jogux: thanks - also miles says he still hasn't gotten email response from him, - he's worried mace isn't getting his mail. | 21:50.06 |
Jogux | henrys : okay, odd, will pass that on too. I know he has been a combination of ridiculously busy and/or away from the office over the past 4 days or so. | 21:51.08 |
ray_laptop | aleray: gsf isn't really a standard font type. Gerber fonts are sometimes labelled .gsf -- other older .gsf fonts were actually conforming Type 1, but weren't from a particular font provider | 21:58.19 |
| google searches turn up that Gerber fonts don't readily convert to outline fonts. | 22:01.40 |
aleray | ray_laptop, thanks. I tried using fontforge,which seems to support gsf, but I got an error: "didn't understand /makeHersheyFontGS993 where " in blended font defn" | 22:02.03 |
ray_laptop | Some Type 1 fonts were shipped with old Ghostscript were labelled .gsf, but they really were Typ 1 | 22:02.25 |
aleray | ray_laptop, any idea how I could do then. My aim is to produce an otf, by expending the stroke to an outline | 22:03.04 |
| fontforge can outline, but it doesn't seems to like the kind of custom commands in some gsf font in gfonts-other | 22:04.14 |
ray_laptop | The hershey fonts were early fonts (outline, stroke fonts) shipped with gs | 22:04.20 |
| aleray: you have now surpassed my understanding of these old fonts :-( | 22:05.25 |
aleray | ray_laptop, yes I'm actually trying to make an outline version of the simplex hershey font | 22:05.57 |
| here is what it looks like: http://paulbourke.net/dataformats/hershey/ | 22:06.05 |
Jogux | henrys : mace reports website stuff is essentially done, he just needs to put it online. | 23:59.13 |
| Forward 1 day (to 2014/03/26)>>> | |