| <<<Back 1 day (to 2014/10/22) | 20141023 |
arafath | Hello | 04:34.14 |
ghostbot | Welcome to #ghostscript, the channel for Ghostscript and MuPDF. If you have a question, please ask it, don't ask to ask it. Do be prepared to wait for a reply as devs will check the logs and reply when they come on line. | 04:34.14 |
arafath | If I wan't to show my pdf pages inside own grid views .. rather than starting MuPDFActivity .. how can I do that | 04:44.32 |
| and is there any detail api documentation for android library | 04:45.53 |
dinamic | Anyone knows what string encoding mujs supposed to take in js_pushstring() ? | 06:40.43 |
tor8 | diginet: utf-8 | 08:27.51 |
| I mean dinamic | 08:28.07 |
dinamic | tor8: i figured :), but you might add that to documentation | 09:34.00 |
| tor8: http://mujs.com/docs/reference | 09:34.37 |
tor8 | dinamic: yeah, I probably should. it's completely slipped my mind because UTF-8 is the only sane choice | 09:36.31 |
henrychen | anyone knows why MuPDFCore_saveInternal very slow ? | 10:03.57 |
kens | Probably because it has a lot to do | 10:04.10 |
henrychen | fz_write_document spend lots of time | 10:06.12 |
| is it possible to improve it ? | 10:06.43 |
Robin_Watts | henrychen: Almost anything can be improved. How much do you have to spend? | 10:09.37 |
| :) | 10:10.11 |
kens | Hmm, seems you scared him off | 10:15.27 |
Robin_Watts | oops | 10:27.44 |
henrys | tor8: you've been tasked with adding commit notification emails to the epage repository, sent to tech just like ghostscript and mupdf. I asked them to do it and they pointed at you ;-) | 14:45.46 |
Robin_Watts | tor8: In case it makes a difference, we already have an 'update' hook, so please don't overwrite it. | 14:46.32 |
kens2 | We should move casper : | 14:56.33 |
| http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/10/23/aws_frankfurt_region/ | 14:56.33 |
| :-) | 14:56.41 |
tor8 | Robin_Watts: the email notification is in the post-receive hook | 15:17.56 |
| Robin_Watts: so that should be safe to just copy over and configure the mail list destination | 15:18.11 |
| henrys: Robin_Watts: should be set up now | 15:20.15 |
| I'm not on the gs-commits mailing list so if you could verify that it works I'd appreciate it | 15:20.34 |
| or do you want the emails to go elsewhere? | 15:20.50 |
henrys | tech@artifex.com would be best, thanks tor8 | 15:21.12 |
tor8 | henrys: tech? I'd rather not add automated emails to increase the mail load for everybody who isn't interested in seeing them | 15:21.45 |
| but tech@artifex.com it is for now | 15:22.03 |
| you can change the email in /home/git-private/sot.git/config | 15:22.46 |
kens2 | tech@ is kind of painful, I can't easily filter them off to a commit folder :-( | 15:22.59 |
Robin_Watts | I'd vote for them going to the same place that the current ones go. | 15:23.00 |
kens2 | gs-commits ? | 15:23.06 |
Robin_Watts | (so gs-commits) | 15:23.08 |
tor8 | Robin_Watts: the current ones go to a public mail list, so that may not be appropriate | 15:23.15 |
kens2 | WOudl be better from my POV | 15:23.19 |
Robin_Watts | so-commits then :) | 15:23.27 |
henrys | I wanted to include jogux and pedro hence tech for now. | 15:23.57 |
kens2 | anything that's not tech or any other mass-subscribed list would get my vote | 15:24.02 |
tor8 | kens2: you might be able to get gmail to pre-filter before you fetch them | 15:24.34 |
kens2 | Probably, it depends if there's something unique I cna look for | 15:24.51 |
tor8 | but I'm in agreement with ken here, I'd rather not clutter tech | 15:24.54 |
kens2 | Currently I use gs-commits in the subject | 15:24.59 |
Robin_Watts | An so-commits mail alias would seem to make sense. | 15:25.13 |
henrys | fine by me. | 15:25.23 |
kens2 | Seems reasonable to me, would it be difficult to set up ? | 15:25.28 |
tor8 | Robin_Watts: yes, an so-commits@artifex.com alias would be my preference as well | 15:25.36 |
Robin_Watts | kens2: That would be an ecumenical question. | 15:25.40 |
henrys | I'll make the alias. | 15:29.37 |
| and I won't nag that everyone should be on the list and at least have some sense of what is going on in the code base ... ;-) | 15:31.03 |
kens2 | I could look at the emails, but they wouldn't mean anything to me | 15:31.31 |
henrys | I'm certain you are underestimating what you know kens2 | 15:32.53 |
chrisl | Isolated commits are not a great way to "get a sense for the code base"...... | 15:33.34 |
kens2 | I know that I know nothing about SOT :-) | 15:33.44 |
| SO that's a 'known unknown' :-) | 15:34.15 |
jogux | kens: I could take offence at that ;-) | 15:37.47 |
henrys | jogux: maybe we need another class ;-) | 15:38.49 |
jogux | :-) | 15:39.59 |
chrisl | jogux: I think kens2's comment is fair: before your presentations, it was an "unknown unknown"....... | 15:41.20 |
jogux | hehe | 15:41.36 |
henrys | gs-commits is at ghostscript.com should I make this so-commits at artitfex dot com. I thought we were moving away from ghostscript.com | 15:43.49 |
chrisl | henrys: the public mailing lists are all hosted on ghostscript.com | 15:44.26 |
kens2 | We wanted to move away form the email addresses on ghostscript.com | 15:44.48 |
| Not necessarily the mailing lists | 15:44.57 |
henrys | kens2, chrisl sorry I was projecting ;-) | 15:45.25 |
kens2 | OOps, I just pushed my work in progress bacn to origin. Hmm.... | 15:45.45 |
| branch* | 15:45.51 |
chrisl | You can delete it again..... | 15:46.30 |
kens2 | I'm trying to figure out how | 15:46.42 |
| Preferably without deleting my local branch in a similar accident | 15:47.04 |
chrisl | Hmm, the webpage I had bookmarked with the incantation is gone :-( | 15:48.00 |
kens2 | thinks I'll try and sort that out tomorrow | 15:48.06 |
chrisl | kens2: it's gone | 15:50.22 |
kens2 | Apparently git push [remote] :[branch] is the way to do it | 15:50.28 |
| Oh thanks chrisl | 15:50.33 |
chrisl | Yeh, just found it - thought it safer for me to do it | 15:50.46 |
kens2 | Yep, makes sure I can't mess up and lose my one :-) | 15:50.57 |
| I will now try again to commit it to my repository instead of origin...... | 15:51.13 |
Robin_Watts | "git push remote branch" is actually shorthand for "git push remote branch:branch" | 15:51.21 |
kens2 | And this time with all the commits actually in place too | 15:51.27 |
Robin_Watts | and "git push remote local_name:remote_name" pushes local_name as remote_name | 15:51.54 |
kens2 | Yeah I was just reading about it | 15:52.13 |
Robin_Watts | This means you can do: git push remote hash:master or git push remote master~2:master say. | 15:52.19 |
| I use the latter all the time to push all but the last 2 commits to golden. | 15:52.45 |
| And if local_name is empty, then you're pushing 'nothing' to the remote (i.e. deleting that tag) | 15:53.09 |
| As git goes, that bits relatively sane :) | 15:53.26 |
kens2 | OK looks like I got the runes right that time, its on my repo now, so its 'safe'. Or at least 'safer from my thumb fingered use of Git' | 15:54.58 |
chrisl | kens2: I think you push your master to your repo, not your branch: http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=user/ken/ghostpdl.git;a=summary | 15:56.59 |
kens2 | Looks like you may be correct | 15:57.23 |
| So wrong incantation again | 15:57.32 |
chrisl | git push <repo> <branch> | 15:57.50 |
kens2 | Aha, found it in git gui | 15:58.37 |
| I knew I'd done this before | 15:58.50 |
| Yay, there it is | 15:59.20 |
chrisl | Hmph, gui - you deserve what you get..... :-) | 15:59.46 |
kens2 | I was using the command line before that | 15:59.59 |
| At least the gui worked | 16:00.05 |
kens2 | wonders why 'gsave' does not call zgsave(), but ends up in gs_gsave vis z2gsave() | 16:03.23 |
chrisl | You have to ask?? | 16:03.57 |
kens2 | No I suppose not | 16:04.18 |
| Its had me scratching my head for the last few minutes.... | 16:04.29 |
chrisl | I would guess that zgsave is .gsave? | 16:04.55 |
kens2 | I expect so, but it makes me wonder under what conditions zgsave() can be called | 16:07.00 |
| Not that it really matters, at least I now stand some chance of figuring out why my graphics state has aNULL for the device entry. | 16:07.35 |
henrys | tor8: okay so-commit at artifex dot com should work now. | 16:10.31 |
kens2 | Hmm, so hte reason the device is NULL is because we push pdf14dev using gx_set_device_only, and pdf14dev is NULL. Weird. | 16:12.11 |
| Aha, its a create compositor, I be I'm not handling that properly | 16:12.33 |
| And of course we don't actually check to see if hte create_compositor actually created a device, we rely on the return code | 16:13.16 |
| OK that's enough for today, my brain hurts. Goodnight everyone | 16:15.13 |
tor8 | henrys: okay, I've changed the config | 16:32.50 |
| Forward 1 day (to 2014/10/24)>>> | |