| <<<Back 1 day (to 2014/12/22) | 20141223 |
mvrhel_laptop | kens: for the logs. lets talk about skiing in CO. I would be interested in joining you | 01:33.55 |
| I will try to get on IRC tomorrow morning | 01:34.13 |
| cough. vail is pretty pricey. | 01:59.33 |
kens | mvrhel_laptop, yeah Vail is expensive. Copper is cheaper, but not hugely so and the pictures look like a typical French modern ski resort, all concrete brutalist architecture. Funcitonal, but not pretty. I'll try and be around this evening to chat if you make it online. I'm on vacation from tomorrow for quite a period. | 08:38.09 |
| Hi chrisl, thought you were on vacation..... | 13:03.07 |
chrisl | kens: I am, but I thought I'd better see what's happening about flights etc for Denver.... besides, I just had my first proper squash training in ~3 weeks, and my legs are about to fall off! | 13:04.32 |
kens | :-D | 13:04.44 |
Robin_Watts | chris: Hi. | 13:04.52 |
kens | Robin posted his proposed flights | 13:04.55 |
Robin_Watts | https://www.google.co.uk/flights/#search;f=LHR;t=DEN;d=2015-03-05;r=2015-03-11;sel=LHRDEN0BA219,DENLHR0BA218;px=2 | 13:05.36 |
kens | Did you actually book anything yet Robin ? | 13:06.29 |
Robin_Watts | kens: No, we're just waiting to hear back to see if Flight Centre can match the internet price for the flights. | 13:07.01 |
| But we'll book later today. | 13:07.09 |
chrisl | Robin_Watts: cool, thanks. And are you okay with Helen volunteering you to sort out the hotels? | 13:07.34 |
kens | OK, I want to talk to Michael if I can, before booking anything | 13:07.37 |
Robin_Watts | chrisl: Sure. | 13:08.59 |
| We'll block book them and pay when we get there. | 13:09.09 |
chrisl | Robin_Watts: great, thanks. | 13:09.20 |
Robin_Watts | That way we don't risk running out of rooms with 4 of us booked in one hotel etc. | 13:09.38 |
rayjj | morning, all | 13:55.06 |
kens | Morning | 13:55.13 |
rayjj | kens: quick work tracking down that segfault (bug 695753) | 14:06.39 |
kens | Well, I've been there before, with fonts that get freed along with the FontDescriptor. It did take some tracking though. | 14:07.12 |
| Took me most of the morning to figure it out | 14:07.21 |
avih | tor8: if you wish to examine a cleaner version of the wrapper, https://github.com/avih/mpv/compare/f25c23...js-duk#diff-192770393593ad22e8fe5aad97e3ef15R399 and if you have any, i'd appreciate comments. | 14:09.01 |
rayjj | kens: the nice thing is that it was readily reproducible, even on 32-bit windoze | 14:09.05 |
| time to run out for coffee. bbiab | 14:09.38 |
kens | rayjj not surprising given the nature of the problem. The font is left referncing a cache which no longer exists | 14:10.23 |
tor8 | avih: iterators are sorta-slow ... they need to allocate a temporary list since you can delete and add properties in the middle of a for loop | 14:13.15 |
avih | tor8: you mean in general or with the new wrapper function? | 14:13.49 |
| i guess i could use them less, but i don't think i can avoid them since it converts an arbitrary native js object into mpv's data structure | 14:14.30 |
tor8 | in general. js_pushiterator (which is used by the for (v in list) statement) | 14:14.38 |
avih | i see. thx. then i'll use them less | 14:15.08 |
tor8 | avih: indeed. if you're intending to list all the properties in order to convert to another format, you'll need to use the iterator | 14:15.15 |
avih | k, good info. | 14:16.12 |
| fwiw though, the native interface isn't expected to be used much, and even when it is, it usually has very few properties. | 14:17.41 |
| generally, the strings based interfaces are more general, since in order to use the native interface (especially when sending native js objects to mpv), the object has to be constructed in a very specific way, while the string based interfaces are much more relaxed | 14:18.53 |
| (and the object construction is specific per mpv property which it intends to modify) | 14:19.54 |
chrisl | Robin_Watts: so those are definitely the flights we're going for? I wanna get them booked...... | 14:23.07 |
Robin_Watts | chrisl: Yes. We're about to pay for ours now. | 14:27.08 |
| Flight Center will save 25 quid a flight, I think. | 14:27.20 |
chrisl | G | 14:27.21 |
| Great, thanks | 14:27.27 |
| Difficult to type holding a guitar ;-) | 14:27.40 |
Robin_Watts | which doesn't matter for you as Miles is paying :) | 14:27.50 |
chrisl | I just went direct to BA. And I've done a PE upgrade for the return..... | 14:29.33 |
Robin_Watts | Do NOT tell Helen that :) | 14:30.01 |
chrisl | After talking to SHiela in London, Helen should be angling for first class ;-) | 14:31.03 |
Robin_Watts | OK, flights booked. | 14:37.48 |
henrys | 40 minute trip to the meeting... getting off to a good start for the 2015 meeting season. | 14:58.28 |
kens | That's less than I took to get to London.... | 14:58.50 |
madmoose | That's a very nice greeting card I got from Artifex. Thank you very much and season greetings to you too, people at Artifex. | 15:00.24 |
Robin_Watts | madmoose: Have a great Xmas. | 15:01.50 |
henrys | madmoose: I don't recognize your irc nick. but thanks. | 15:02.03 |
Robin_Watts | henrys: traditionally this means you should arrive last :) | 15:02.11 |
henrys | marcos sometimes skips the breakfast... I don't miss free food. | 15:03.11 |
Robin_Watts | That's the main purpose for the meetings, right? :) | 15:03.34 |
mvrhel_laptop | morning | 15:03.56 |
Robin_Watts | morning. | 15:04.01 |
| Simultaneous kens and mvrhel! | 15:04.13 |
kens | WHat? I was here first :-) | 15:04.45 |
henrys | finally can cut the cable from the evil empire. 1G fiber Q1 2015... | 15:05.07 |
mvrhel_laptop | henrys: nice. I wish we had that | 15:05.29 |
kens | Hmm, I wonder what fibre would cost me now | 15:05.35 |
mvrhel_laptop | kens: so I would like to go skiing. I need to talk with the boss a bit about this though | 15:07.05 |
| perhaps we can split a room if I can get it sorted? | 15:07.20 |
rayjj | henrys: wow! I wish I could get that. There's only one "trial" area in Orange Co. that has fiber available | 15:07.22 |
Robin_Watts | http://www.superfast-openreach.co.uk/where-and-when/ | 15:07.23 |
kens | mvrhel_laptop : Sure, I'm ok with sharing | 15:07.29 |
mvrhel_laptop | and I wonder if it would be cheaper to go ahead and get a vehicle or is everyone doing a shuttle? | 15:07.48 |
henrys | kens: I was recommending other places then it occured to me you will be sans car. That really makes Vail a "best choice" | 15:08.01 |
rayjj | I'm in for skiing (probably) as well, depending on when/where we go | 15:08.04 |
kens | mvrhel_laptop : I can't drive so I was planning shuttle, but if you're offering to drive.... :-) | 15:08.07 |
madmoose | henrys: I only contributed a couple of minor patches to mupdf a while back (multipage tiff support and some very small bug fixes). | 15:08.09 |
kens | henrys, yes, there's a shuttle from the airport, which helps me a lot | 15:08.25 |
rayjj | I don't mind driving in the snow | 15:08.27 |
mvrhel_laptop | I can drive. we just need to do a cost comparison | 15:08.31 |
kens | The shuttle was $188 round trip I think | 15:08.42 |
henrys | kens: also the shuttle that goes around vail takes you everywhere, not so easy other places. | 15:08.55 |
kens | tor8 needs to eb in on this too if he wants to ski | 15:08.58 |
rayjj | renting is usually MUCH cheaper | 15:09.07 |
mvrhel_laptop | sure as the number of people increases | 15:09.23 |
| if the whole group is going we should just get a place to rent | 15:09.44 |
kens | It won't be everyone | 15:09.52 |
rayjj | mvrhel_laptop: even for 1, if only for a day or two | 15:09.55 |
Robin_Watts | If there are several of you, then it may be worth looking at condos. | 15:09.56 |
mvrhel_laptop | yes | 15:10.00 |
kens | Currently its thee me and Tor | 15:10.01 |
Robin_Watts | Paul/Chris/I are travelling to Longmont (Sat/Sun), then out to Vail (Mon/Tue). | 15:10.27 |
kens | Robin_Watts : BT says 'demand is high' by which I figure they mean 'the cabinet is full' so I can't get fibre atm | 15:11.12 |
Robin_Watts | kens: Hmm. Maybe. Or it might mean "We can do a random set of streets near you". | 15:11.47 |
mvrhel_laptop | hmm not much skiing in longmont though.. | 15:11.58 |
kens | Nah it asked for my exact address | 15:12.00 |
Robin_Watts | mvrhel_laptop: No indeed. Helen and I aren't skiing. | 15:12.20 |
kens | mvrhel_laptop : My current plan is to head to Vail on Sunday | 15:12.22 |
Robin_Watts | Paul and Linda plan to try a days skiing in vail, I think. | 15:12.31 |
tor8 | kens: 4 of us if all who've expressed interest in skiing are going. I'm still not 100% decided, the prices you quoted yesterday scared me off a bit... | 15:12.36 |
kens | tor8 who is the 4th ? | 15:12.51 |
Robin_Watts | ray/tor/mvrhel/ken | 15:13.01 |
tor8 | kens: you, me, mvrhel and rayjj | 15:13.02 |
mvrhel_laptop | ray, michael, ken, tor | 15:13.04 |
kens | I missed ray | 15:13.10 |
| Sorry ray | 15:13.14 |
henrys | if you guys do have a car I'd be less inclined to pick Vail, but it is a "classic" coloroado ski stop. | 15:13.17 |
mvrhel_laptop | henrys: with car, where should we go? | 15:13.29 |
rayjj | kens: np. I have to clear it with the boss | 15:13.35 |
kens | has already done due diligence and am allowed to go 'but be careful' | 15:14.03 |
rayjj | I like Copper / Breckenridge (I think there are a couple of others there) | 15:14.04 |
mvrhel_laptop | I have been to vail and would not mind trying something else | 15:14.17 |
kens | the site Henry pointed at rated copper | 15:14.21 |
rayjj | I know my wife will demand I wear a brain bucket | 15:14.22 |
henrys | http://www.powderhounds.com/USA/Ski-Colorado/Best-Ski-Resorts.aspx | 15:14.29 |
| if it is a good spring season vail can be very crowded also. | 15:15.09 |
rayjj | I didn't care for Vail as much. | 15:15.15 |
| are we talking Sun and Monday ? | 15:16.17 |
kens | Snowmass is a long way and Telluride looks a long way also | 15:16.24 |
| rayjj I may well stay more days | 15:16.30 |
rayjj | kens: that would make sense given the travel time you have | 15:17.11 |
kens | Yep :-) | 15:17.18 |
| Breckenridge looks possible too | 15:17.38 |
| 80 miles west of Denver | 15:17.48 |
| rayjj : mvrhel_laptop do you 2 want to look at what you think you would enjoy and is affordable ? I'm fine with pretty much anything as long as there's snow and a lift :-) | 15:20.21 |
| And if all else fails I'll go solo (I may need to anyway if I stay extra days) | 15:20.44 |
mvrhel_laptop | kens: ok. I will see what I can find. i would prefer to spend $ on skiing and not staying at a fancy place with the stars | 15:21.29 |
kens | not too bothered, as long as it has a bed :-) | 15:21.55 |
mvrhel_laptop | I (and I am guessing ray) need to talk with wife and make sure this is all ok | 15:21.56 |
rayjj | OK, I'm in. I've talked to the boss, and checked the choir calendar | 15:22.04 |
kens | Indeed. Don't forget Tor also | 15:22.09 |
mvrhel_laptop | Tor sounds like he is in if the $ is not to crazy | 15:22.27 |
henrys | if you guys have a big group look into vrbo.com | 15:22.34 |
kens | THe prices at Copper looked better as I recall | 15:22.40 |
mvrhel_laptop | yes good idea | 15:22.40 |
rayjj | iirc, there are multi-day ski passes for Copper + Breckenridge (I think 4 resorts in the area) that are good at any of the places. | 15:23.38 |
rayjj | goes to check... | 15:23.42 |
kens | I think you need at least 3 days, maybe 2 | 15:24.00 |
| I did look earlier | 15:24.06 |
rayjj | Keystone is OK, Arapahoe Basin tends to get less crowds and the runs are somewhat less "groomed" (once again from history) | 15:25.34 |
| but there _are_ 4 resorts in the Summit County area that are reasonable to ski if you have a car | 15:26.10 |
henrys | you should be okay in early march - but A basin is the best bet if you are worried about early warming (melting) | 15:26.47 |
kens | Yeah I hadn't looked at that because I was assuming I'd be without vehicle | 15:26.57 |
mvrhel_laptop | with 4 of us, a car is def the way to go. oh I wonder if scott wants to join us. he likes to ski | 15:27.24 |
kens | Probably need to drop him an email | 15:27.45 |
mvrhel_laptop | ok I will check in with him | 15:27.57 |
kens | mvrhel_laptop : Do you mind if I leave this with you ? Since you, ray and scott are alll in the same time zone | 15:28.16 |
| Well, more or less | 15:28.21 |
mvrhel_laptop | kens: yes that is fine | 15:28.26 |
kens | Thanks mvrhel_laptop | 15:28.34 |
mvrhel_laptop | kens: are we thinking of heading out early to ski on sunday too? | 15:28.43 |
kens | I'd like to, or even out Sat night | 15:28.55 |
mvrhel_laptop | out sat would make sense | 15:29.03 |
rayjj | mvrhel_laptop: Miles also. He may want to ski as long as he doesn't have to pay :-) | 15:29.08 |
mvrhel_laptop | and ski sun, mon, tues | 15:29.09 |
kens | But when I checked the prices in Vail, staying Saturday ramped the price up hugely | 15:29.09 |
mvrhel_laptop | ok well I think we nix vail based on the $ | 15:29.26 |
rayjj | and the skiing isn't as good (IMHO) | 15:29.43 |
kens | Sure, the reason I was looking at it was ease of transportation | 15:29.50 |
rayjj | very groomed | 15:29.54 |
| I'm actually in Saint Louis area now (till 12/31) so I am in Scott's TZ :-) | 15:30.57 |
mvrhel_laptop | I need to pick a good time to check with stephanie about all of this and I will see about scott and miles, check on vehicle rental | 15:31.05 |
henrys | I think scott stopped skiing a while back but worth asking him. | 15:31.26 |
mvrhel_laptop | I am in Virginia right now until the 30th | 15:31.29 |
kens | At least 1 place in Copper @ $177/night | 15:31.44 |
rayjj | We can head up Sun AM and still ski Sunday | 15:31.53 |
mvrhel_laptop | ok lets focus on copper then | 15:31.58 |
| I will check vrbo a bit | 15:32.09 |
kens | Breckenridge may be good too | 15:32.11 |
rayjj | kens: that isn't a 4+ person condo is it ? | 15:32.16 |
kens | But yes, best to look around | 15:32.17 |
Robin_Watts | "I need to pick a good time to check with stephanie about all of this". hehe. | 15:32.18 |
kens | rayjj no its a single | 15:32.26 |
Robin_Watts | I don't think there is a married man here who doesn't understand that :) | 15:32.37 |
rayjj | Note, with a car, the places to stay are MUCH more flexible | 15:32.39 |
mvrhel_laptop | :) | 15:32.47 |
kens | Indeed, but I'm not used to that :-) | 15:32.55 |
rayjj | I'm checking some of the rental sites (I | 15:34.08 |
| I've used "flipkey" before, but I'll check others as well | 15:34.30 |
henrys | http://www.vrbo.com/271014 ... | 15:34.55 |
mvrhel_laptop | http://www.vrbo.com/75503 | 15:35.09 |
henrys | vrbo is the way to go 200 a night for all of you | 15:35.41 |
mvrhel_laptop | yes :) that helps a bunch | 15:35.52 |
henrys | you may not have a lot of privacy though. | 15:36.11 |
Robin_Watts | I have a friend who just booked a holiday with "Vacation Rentals By Owner" (or something very similar). | 15:36.59 |
| She signed the contract, paid the deposit etc. | 15:37.10 |
| Then got contacted by them to say that they'd had some fraud on that property, and that they should actually contact the owner to check that their money had arrived. | 15:37.43 |
mvrhel_laptop | ick. I have not had any problems using vrbo in the past but I suppose it can happen | 15:38.16 |
| brb | 15:38.26 |
Robin_Watts | So she tried to get in touch, couldn't get a reply etc... ended up cancelling the credit card etc. | 15:38.27 |
| Then the website got in touch and said "oops, sorry, you know you looked at 2 properties? it was the other one that had problems". | 15:38.58 |
rayjj | one place is 4br, 3ba $1125 for Sun-Tue | 15:39.03 |
Robin_Watts | She was less than pleased. | 15:39.07 |
henrys | vrbo does have insurance you can take out. | 15:40.15 |
| last I used it was 2 years ago for a race in canada, it went perfectly but you never know. | 15:42.01 |
rayjj | Robin_Watts: we've done that with the family 5 times. Never had a bad experience (although the dishwasher didn't work at 1 place) | 15:42.02 |
Robin_Watts | rayjj: I'm quite prepared to believe it works well, especially for families/groups. | 15:42.38 |
rayjj | but the range for 4 br 3 ba (sleep 10+) is about $1K-$1.5K or so for the three days. | 15:43.53 |
mvrhel_laptop | that is not too bad | 15:54.34 |
kens | Hmm, looks like Zeniko has provided some files wich do contain Outlines with Actions, including a Launch action... | 15:55.01 |
mvrhel_laptop | I need to head out for bit. kens, so, you will be out of contact what days/dates? | 15:55.29 |
kens | From this evening until January 10th | 15:55.45 |
| But until January 3rd I will be about from time to time | 15:55.56 |
| I'll try and make sure to get onto IRC from time to time | 15:56.15 |
mvrhel_laptop | wow | 15:56.49 |
kens | Xmas, then ski-ing in Austria (if there's actually any snow by then, otherwise walking ;-) | 15:57.14 |
mvrhel_laptop | ok. so for about a week you will be out of contact | 15:57.19 |
kens | Yes, Jan 3rd until 10th I'll be in Austria | 15:57.33 |
mvrhel_laptop | so tor8 you will likely be in with all of this? | 15:58.12 |
| ok. heading out for a bit | 16:01.06 |
kens | see you later | 16:01.15 |
marcosw | wow, united now only has 1 flight per day from san jose to denver, I remember when there used to be 3 or 4. Looks like I'll have to fly out of SFO. | 16:01.40 |
mvrhel_laptop | oh marcosw: are you interested in skiing? | 16:02.30 |
tor8 | mvrhel_laptop: not out of the question, but I still haven't made up my mind. which I'll need to do before deciding which flights to take. | 16:03.30 |
| kens: you've already booked flights? | 16:03.36 |
kens | tor8 not yet | 16:03.41 |
| Was waiting to see what Michael turned up | 16:03.48 |
mvrhel_laptop | tor8: ok. | 16:04.21 |
marcosw | mvrhel_laptop: I can't stay past Sat night, I have a previous commitment on Sunday. I suppose I could fly out earlier but probably not worth the effort since I'm not good enough to appreciate the differences between California and Colorado snow. | 16:09.56 |
rayjj | Wow! RT airfare (non-stop) from Orange Co. is only $178 on Southwest | 16:11.41 |
| and that's with 2 checked bags free (not that I'll need it) | 16:12.43 |
| I can get a flight out at 8:50pm which would let me ski Tue, then drive back to the airport. But that depends on when (and which day) others are thinking to return | 16:14.26 |
kens | Initially looking at Flying in Thursday and back on Wednesday evening to fit in with the other UK folks, but not vital | 16:15.13 |
| I just checked and there's a Denver shuttle to Copper too so I can always make my own way back | 16:15.31 |
rayjj | I'll fly in Thursday (pretty much have to for a Fri meeting) | 16:16.48 |
| kens: well, if we ski Tue and come back to Denver airport area, you can stay there Tue night for your Wed flight | 16:17.41 |
kens | Yes that's also possible | 16:17.51 |
rayjj | kens: you wouldn't be able to ski Wed anyway | 16:18.18 |
kens | You think ? | 16:18.29 |
| Wednesday moprning would be possible I suspect | 16:18.45 |
rayjj | oh I missed you saying Wed evening. Depends on when you need to check in, etc. (how late your flight is) | 16:19.06 |
kens | Flight is near 7pm as I recall | 16:19.15 |
Robin_Watts | 18:40 | 16:19.34 |
kens | so 2 hour check in and 2 hours to get to airport, would need to leave around lunch time | 16:19.37 |
rayjj | it's about 1 hour down from Summit County area, iirc | 16:19.39 |
Robin_Watts | rayjj: Only if you're driving :) | 16:19.49 |
rayjj | Robin_Watts: I guess I didn't recall correctly. It's 96 miles (some of which are mountain). It's faster downhill, but now that pot is legal in CO, people probably drive a lot slower | 16:23.18 |
| (actually I forgot that the airport is on the other side of Denver) | 16:23.55 |
Robin_Watts | rayjj: I actually meant "but ken might be on a bus, as he doesn't drive". | 16:24.04 |
kens | The shuttle saiod 2 hours to Vail from the airport, and Copper is closer | 16:24.28 |
rayjj | kens: yeah, 2 hours is more reasonable (and that's if it isn't in a snowstorm) | 16:28.20 |
kens | The timetable for copper doesn't say how long it takes (could be a hint ?) But the return trips are 3 hours after the departure. So I'm guessing that a 1:30 departure form Summit county would get me to DIA by 4:30, whihc would be fine for a flight at 18:40 | 16:29.39 |
| Price isn't bad at $44 either | 16:30.30 |
| The vail shuttle was $188 return | 16:30.43 |
| RIght I'm off, have a good Xmas and New Year everyone. I'll be back here later, to read the logs at least, and from time to time until I head off to Austria in the New Year. | 17:09.46 |
Zeus93 | hello | 17:21.50 |
ghostbot | Welcome to #ghostscript, the channel for Ghostscript and MuPDF. If you have a question, please ask it, don't ask to ask it. Do be prepared to wait for a reply as devs will check the logs and reply when they come on line. | 17:21.50 |
Zeus93 | I'm trying to compile mupdf but getting the following: STDERR: source/fitz/colorspace.c: In function âfz_new_indexed_colorspaceâ: source/fitz/colorspace.c:1245:2: warning: âcsâ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized] return cs; ^ source/fitz/draw-glyph.c: In function âfz_render_glyph_pixmapâ: source/fitz/draw-glyph.c:412:13: warning: âvalâ may be used uninitialized in this function [ | 17:24.34 |
| I don't know whats missing. | 17:26.03 |
| If someone can give me some pointer as to how can I workaround this issue will be much appreciated | 17:26.51 |
Robin_Watts | Zeus93: What version of the source? | 17:34.07 |
Zeus93 | I'm downloading the latest from git | 17:39.54 |
Robin_Watts | Ah, then I suspect it's your C compiler getting confused by the use of setjmp. | 17:42.59 |
| Yes. If you look in source/fitz/colorspace.c at the fz_new_indexed_colorspace function, you'll see we use fz_try/fz_catch. | 17:47.14 |
| Those are some exception handling macros that wrap setjmp/longjmp. | 17:47.39 |
| If the fz_new_colorspace call fails (throws/does a longjmp) then it will end up in the catch clause. | 17:48.27 |
Zeus93 | Thanks for your help Robin! | 17:48.58 |
Robin_Watts | The compiler isn't smart enough to know that fz_rethrow_message never returns, hence it thinks that we are returning cs. | 17:49.00 |
| Not sure there is an easy way around it, except to disable that warning. | 17:49.18 |
Zeus93 | Could I try downloading an older version? | 17:50.35 |
Robin_Watts | Zeus93: That code has not changed in a while. | 17:51.34 |
tor8 | Zeus93: it's a warning, not an error. your best bet to avoid this warning is to use clang, it is much better at following control flow than gcc. | 17:53.20 |
Robin_Watts | You can use: -Wno-maybe-uninitialized | 17:53.44 |
| or -Wno-error=maybe-uninitialized | 17:53.53 |
Zeus93 | Tor, how do I go about using clang? | 17:54.35 |
| Robin, thanks! let me give that a try | 17:54.49 |
tor8 | if you have installed clang, build with "make CC=clang" | 17:55.04 |
Robin_Watts | Zeus93: make XCFLAGS="-Wno-maybe-uninitialized" | 17:55.04 |
Zeus93 | Thank you both for your suggestion! I will try and get back in here with update! | 17:56.22 |
| whoa, I tried Robin's suggestion and it worked! but now I'm getting this STDERR: In file included from /opt/mupdf/include/openjpeg-2.1/opj_stdint.h:34:0, from /opt/mupdf/include/openjpeg-2.1/openjpeg.h:115, from source/fitz/load-jpx.c:11: /opt/mupdf/include/openjpeg-2.1/opj_config.h:2:0: warning: "OPJ_HAVE_STDINT_H" redefined [enabled by default] #define OPJ_HAVE_STDINT_H 1 | 18:30.20 |
Robin_Watts | Zeus93: You are building from git, right? | 18:31.45 |
Zeus93 | yes | 18:31.56 |
Robin_Watts | Did you get the openjpeg libs from our git too ? | 18:32.01 |
Zeus93 | let me check | 18:32.13 |
Robin_Watts | In the mupdf tree, do: git submodule update --init | 18:32.21 |
| and that will pull all the required libs down into mupdf/third-party | 18:32.33 |
| Then build again, and it will use ours in preference. | 18:32.46 |
Zeus93 | we used http://openjpeg.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/@2846 openjpeg | 18:33.56 |
| ok Robin thank you! Let me try that | 18:34.38 |
tor8 | Robin_Watts: the openjpeg libs from our git will always print the deprecated blah blah warnings | 18:37.33 |
Robin_Watts | tor8: Yes, but those aren't the warnings listed above, right? | 18:38.04 |
tor8 | Robin_Watts: no, but it looks like Zeus93 is on a crusade to build warning free | 18:38.23 |
Robin_Watts | tor8: Well, we'll burn that bridge when we come to it. | 18:38.40 |
Zeus93 | hahaha robin | 18:40.03 |
| i'm pretty new to mupdf so I just want to do everything clean :p | 18:41.23 |
Robin_Watts | Zeus93: Well, using our libs is a good way to get there. | 18:41.42 |
| We do our best to keep the number of warnings to a minimum, but there are a couple in there. The deprecated ones in openjpeg are one. | 18:42.06 |
| I think there are some signed/unsigned ones in jbig2dec too. | 18:42.17 |
Zeus93 | i already did jbig2dec | 18:43.02 |
| Robin, how do I let it build using mupdf/thirdparty? | 18:57.08 |
Robin_Watts | Zeus93: Just use the usual make command. | 18:57.25 |
Zeus93 | ok thanks | 18:57.48 |
Robin_Watts | It should detect that third-party is there and use that. | 18:57.54 |
Zeus93 | no luck ;( | 19:09.39 |
Robin_Watts | There is stuff in third-party, right? | 19:11.08 |
Zeus93 | yes | 19:12.09 |
Robin_Watts | What errors are you seeing? | 19:13.40 |
Zeus93 | CC build/debug/freetype/ftbase.o In file included from /opt/mupdf/include/freetype2/ft2build.h:37:0, from thirdparty/freetype/src/base/ftbase.c:19: /opt/mupdf/include/freetype2/config/ftheader.h:825:32: fatal error: internal/internal.h: No such file or directory #include FT_INTERNAL_INTERNAL_H | 19:14.37 |
Robin_Watts | kens: mvrhel hasn't posted anything else. | 19:14.59 |
kens | Nope, I read the logs first, thought I;'d drop in and see if he was here, but thanks! | 19:15.16 |
Robin_Watts | Zeus93: OK, on linux it looks like we find system libs using pkg-config :( | 19:15.38 |
| try adding OS="NotLinuxHonest" to your make call ? | 19:16.44 |
Zeus93 | sure will do | 19:17.04 |
tor8 | Robin_Watts: we only look for system libs if the thirdparty libs are missing | 19:25.49 |
| FREETYPE_CFLAGS is set either to pkg-config or thirdparty based on the existence of thirdparty/freetype | 19:27.00 |
| use "make verbose=yes" to see the full commands being executed | 19:27.55 |
Zeus93 | Thanks for the suggestion tor :) | 19:33.14 |
| cc -fPIC -O2 -march=core-avx-i -mcx16 -msahf -mno-movbe -maes -mpclmul -mpopcnt -mno-abm -mno-lwp -mno-fma -mno-fma4 -mno-xop -mno-bmi -mno-bmi2 -mno-tbm -mno-avx -mno-avx2 -msse4.2 -msse4.1 -mno-lzcnt -mno-rtm -mno-hle -mrdrnd -mno-f16c -mfsgsbase -mno-rdseed -mno-prfchw -mno-adx -mfxsr -mno-xsave -mno-xsaveopt --param l1-cache-size=32 --param l1-cache-line-size=64 --param l2-cache-size=25600 -mtune=core-avx-i -fstack-protector | 19:39.56 |
| e-uninitialized -Iinclude -I/tmp/mupdf/include/mupdf -I/opt/mupdf/include -I/opt/mupdf/include/freetype2 -I/opt/mupdf/include/openjpeg-2.1 -Igenerated -Wall -pipe -g -DDEBUG -Iscripts/freetype -Ithirdparty/freetype/include -Ithirdparty/jbig2dec -Iscripts/jpeg -Ithirdparty/jpeg -Iscripts/openjpeg -Ithirdparty/openjpeg/libopenjpeg -Ithirdparty/zlib -Ithirdparty/mujs -o build/debug/freetype/ftbase.o -c thirdparty/freetype/src/base/f | 19:41.12 |
| _NO_CARBON '-DFT_CONFIG_MODULES_H="slimftmodules.h"' '-DFT_CONFIG_OPTIONS_H="slimftoptions.h"' In file included from /opt/mupdf/include/freetype2/ft2build.h:37:0, from thirdparty/freetype/src/base/ftbase.c:19: /opt/mupdf/include/freetype2/config/ftheader.h:825:32: fatal error: internal/internal.h: No such file or directory #include FT_INTERNAL_INTERNAL_H ^ compilation terminated. m | 19:42.04 |
| excuse the truncation of lines | 19:42.29 |
mvrhel_laptop | rayjj: I would think skiing on wed would be hard time wise | 20:03.39 |
| I am thinking skiing sun, mon, tuesday would be plenty for me | 20:04.00 |
kens | mvrhel_laptop : I think it was me talking about ski-ing Wednesday, rather than Ray. You would be planning to head back to Denver and fly out Tuesday ? | 20:39.17 |
mvrhel_laptop | kens: I was thinking of flying back wed, but I generally find flying out the same day as getting any skiing in is hard | 20:50.42 |
| most places don't open until 9 or so | 20:50.52 |
| and the cost of a lift ticket for a few hours | 20:51.14 |
kens | OK so travel back to Denver on Wednesday ? That would suit me, I could fly with robin, chris and co | 20:51.16 |
mvrhel_laptop | yes ski all day tuesday | 20:51.27 |
kens | Sounds good to me :-) | 20:51.32 |
mvrhel_laptop | I am working on approval here. I think it will all go well | 20:51.51 |
kens | :-D I asked over the weekend. Stella decided she didn't want to come though, too cold.... | 20:52.14 |
mvrhel_laptop | there is a possible conflict but it looks like that is during the actual staff meeting which I can't control | 20:52.35 |
| anyway scott does not want to come | 20:52.57 |
kens | OK, so we need a decision from Tor I guess | 20:53.14 |
mvrhel_laptop | so it may be just you, me, ray and hopefully tor | 20:53.15 |
kens | well, I was looking at just me on Monday, so that's a big imporve4ment already :-) | 20:53.36 |
mvrhel_laptop | I will see if miles wants to join us | 20:54.00 |
| henrys: do you want to come? | 20:54.25 |
kens | Also would be good | 20:54.28 |
kens | assumes its no big deal to Henry, being local and all | 20:54.39 |
| Oh and he's not online at the moment, didn't realise | 20:54.58 |
henrys | I think I'm signed up for a rocky mountain park trip with Helen, Robin and Chris. | 20:55.32 |
mvrhel_laptop | henrys: looks like he is online to me | 20:55.33 |
kens | SO he is, I was looking in the wrong place | 20:55.43 |
mvrhel_laptop | henrys: ok | 20:55.54 |
| what about marcos? | 20:56.06 |
| marcosw? | 20:56.14 |
kens | marcosw said no I think | 20:57.19 |
mvrhel_laptop | ok | 20:57.22 |
kens | marcos said he couldn't stay past Sat night as he has a commitment Sunday | 20:58.01 |
kens | runs off again | 20:59.21 |
rayjj | mvrhel: Just in case you missed it, marcosw is out: mvrhel_laptop: I can't stay past Sat night, I have a previous commitment on Sunday. | 21:53.24 |
| Forward 1 day (to 2014/12/24)>>> | |