| | <<<Back 1 day (to 2016/11/01) | 20161102 |
| deekej | hello guys, for which component I should report a bug when 'ps2pdf' is segfaulting? | 10:34.13 |
| | pdfwriter or general? | 10:34.25 |
| | (also, this could be a regression, since it was working with old versions) | 10:34.45 |
| Robin_Watts | deekej: pdfwrite. | 10:40.38 |
| deekej | Robin_Watts: OK, thanks | 10:40.50 |
| Robin_Watts | But the first thing we will ask you to do is to reproduce the problem calling vanilla ghostscript, rather than ps2pdf. | 10:41.00 |
| | Try something like: | 10:41.03 |
| | gs -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -o out.pdf in.ps | 10:41.15 |
| deekej | I have done it | 10:41.16 |
| Robin_Watts | oh, cool. | 10:41.22 |
| deekej | :) | 10:41.25 |
| | I'm just getting a confirmation from one of our custoers, if I can share the *.ps file that's causing the segfault :) | 10:41.57 |
| | *customers | 10:42.07 |
| chrisl | deekej: did you check it with the latest release, with our shipping libraries etc? | 10:52.28 |
| deekej | I download the git repo, checkout the latest commit, unistalled the Fedora ghostscript and rebuild it from scratch (vanilla build) | 10:53.23 |
| | we have a backtrace and coredump where it segfaults | 10:53.42 |
| | I just need a permission to share it with you :) | 10:53.54 |
| chrisl | Great. FWIW, we can mark it as private so it won't be publicly available | 10:54.41 |
| deekej | oh, I wanted to ask that | 10:54.51 |
| chrisl | If they want to be sure, then you can mail it to me, and I'll attach it as private from the start | 10:55.30 |
| deekej | http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697286 - once I get the confirmation from our customer, I will send you the *.ps file causing this | 11:47.15 |
| ray_laptop_ | darn. Not sure what came thru before a net glitch | 15:14.14 |
| sind | hi | 16:42.42 |
| ghostbot | Welcome to #ghostscript, the channel for Ghostscript and MuPDF. If you have a question, please ask it, don't ask to ask it. Do be prepared to wait for a reply as devs will check the logs and reply when they come on line. | 16:42.42 |
| sind | where can I find MuPDF which supports android marshmallow | 16:43.17 |
| | ? | 16:43.21 |
| sebras | sind: doesn't the mupdf in the app store work in marshmallow? | 16:43.39 |
| sind | I'm developing an app which supports marshmallow and this app should use mupdf library | 16:44.54 |
| Robin_Watts | sind: An app that will be released under the ANU AGPL? | 16:45.26 |
| sind | yes | 16:47.09 |
| sebras | sind: the mupdf library is meant to work under android marshmallow. | 16:50.20 |
| Robin_Watts | sind: I can't think of a version of MuPDF that won't work on android marshmallow. | 16:50.23 |
| | Certainly the version from mupdf.com will. | 16:50.31 |
| sind | can you provide me a link with latest version? | 16:50.50 |
| sebras | sind: if you encounter problems please register a bug report on bugs.ghostscript.com and attach the file you have problems with. | 16:50.51 |
| Robin_Watts | If you mean "I can't make it build when I import it into my app", then that's a very different questions. | 16:50.53 |
| | sind: mupdf.com | 16:50.57 |
| sebras | sind: 1.9a is currently the latest released version. | 16:51.35 |
| sind | does 1.9 support marshmallow? | 16:53.00 |
| Robin_Watts | but if you go to the git link on mupdf.com you can get what will soon be 1.10 | 16:53.01 |
| sebras | sind: just because I'm curious, what kind of documents are you going to render? | 16:53.03 |
| Robin_Watts | sind: We've answered that already. | 16:53.17 |
| sebras | sind: 1.9 is should work in android marshmallow, yes. if you see any problems please tell us. | 16:53.36 |
| sind | I have an error saying- unsatisfiedlinkerror:dlopen failed | 16:53.37 |
| Robin_Watts | I can't think of a MuPDF version that *won't* support MuPDF. | 16:53.40 |
| | sind: Are you the guy that opened a bug saying you were using a 64bit toolchain? | 16:54.04 |
| sind | libmupdf.so:has text relocations | 16:54.12 |
| | nope | 16:54.17 |
| Robin_Watts | sind: The current version builds and runs on marshmallow for me. | 16:54.44 |
| sebras | sind: what version of mupdf are you using right now? 1.9a? | 16:54.51 |
| sind | yes 1.9a | 16:58.11 |
| sebras | sind: ok. have you followed the instructions at http://mupdf.com/docs/how-to-build-mupdf-for-android | 16:58.41 |
| | sind: and also the instructions at http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=mupdf.git;a=blob_plain;f=platform/android/viewer/ReadMe.txt;hb=HEAD | 16:58.55 |
| | ? | 16:58.59 |
| sind | gotta look at it now | 16:59.55 |
| sebras | sind: please take care to check that you are using the correct versions of android studio/ndk/sdk/etc and that you are building for the correct 32/64-bit architecture (this is explained in the instructions) | 17:01.01 |
| sind | using eclipse to develop android apps | 17:01.58 |
| Robin_Watts | sind: Follow *our* instructions, and build it as *we* tell you to. If you then have a problem, we might look at it. | 17:02.36 |
| | If you use eclipse and it goes wrong, then we aren't going to be terribly interested. | 17:02.52 |
| sebras | because we are not using eclipse to build our app. | 17:03.25 |
| | sind: if it works for you in android studio/ndk/sdk but not in eclipse you know that is _can_ work, you just need to figure out how to make eclipse do what you want. | 17:04.31 |
| | sind: if you are working on this app for a customer and you need support then you/your company can choose to pay artifex for support. | 17:05.59 |
| sind | ok | 17:06.17 |
| | thanks all | 17:06.19 |
| | Forward 1 day (to 2016/11/03)>>> | |
Log of #ghostscript at irc.freenode.net.