Log of #ghostscript at irc.freenode.net.

Search:
 <<<Back 1 day (to 2016/12/08)20161209 
btwe_ Hey all, quick question re mupdf: Howto reveal content of annotations?08:59.54 
Robin_Watts You'll need to be clearer.09:02.47 
btwe Robin_Watts: mupdf renders me a yellow post-it on pages which contains \09:19.35 
  Robin_Watts: annotation, but I do not know how to I get the content of \09:19.35 
  Robin_Watts: these - it is literally the text which I cannot see. 09:19.35 
Robin_Watts Right, so the yellow post it is the 'appearance stream', so that's what we render.09:27.21 
  Can you go to bugs.ghostscript.com and open a bug, and attach an example file?09:27.39 
  Then we can have a look and figure out what we need to do09:27.50 
btwe Robin_Watts: How is it supposed to be? Do I have to press a key or click \09:48.58 
  Robin_Watts: somewhere to get the annotation text?09:48.58 
kens We need to see the file.09:50.25 
  Most likely the annotation does not have an appearance stream (or the appearance stream does not include the text), in which case it needs to be synthesised from the other contents09:51.03 
  But we need to see the file to find out , which is why RObin asked you to open a bug report09:51.28 
btwe kens: ok, I'll continue there, thanks09:53.46 
Robin_Watts tor8: Morning.12:01.42 
tor8 Robin_Watts: morning.12:01.49 
Robin_Watts Various commits on robin/master12:02.26 
  Ignore the last 2.12:02.34 
tor8 the first 2 LGTM, I think I reviewed those already12:02.59 
  the "Fix API comment." LGTM as well12:03.45 
  pdfportfolio.o should be in alphabetic order in the Makefile12:04.01 
Robin_Watts fixed.12:05.21 
tor8 what do you think about mutool portfolio matching commands with 'ar'?12:06.40 
  t (list table of entries), x (extract), a (add)12:07.06 
  or is that going to be confusing, due to us not being able to create new blank pdf documents here?12:07.45 
Robin_Watts I am not wedded to the current options.12:09.29 
  but trying to match ar seems bad.12:09.41 
  cos we do different things to ar.12:09.48 
  (in particular, when we embed, we have to give the filename to embed, plus what it should be embedded as)12:10.08 
tor8 yeah. 't' for listing matches both ar and tar though.12:12.50 
  I think the question is, do we want to overwrite the input file when adding portfolios?12:13.37 
Robin_Watts tor8: I do not.12:13.49 
  't' rather than 'l' seems reasonable.12:14.03 
tor8 can we create new empty portfolio wrapper pdf files?12:14.14 
  i.e. not have an input file to work from12:14.23 
Robin_Watts if only cos l looks too much like 'i' or '1'.12:14.23 
  tor8: No.12:14.31 
  Not currently anyway.12:14.46 
  We can add portfolios to a PDF that doesn't have any, but we won't create a blank PDF for them.12:15.03 
tor8 and can we embed multiple files in one go?12:15.05 
Robin_Watts tor8: Not currently, but I can fix that I think.12:16.06 
tor8 I think it should be easy to, if we have no infile, create a blank pdf to work from12:16.51 
  just call pdf_new_document and insert a blank page with some boilerplate text12:17.19 
  I'll patch that in if you want12:17.26 
Robin_Watts oh, wait...12:17.27 
  I'd have to change the way 'e' works to enable us to do multiple files.12:18.01 
tor8 Robin_Watts: also, not fond of the } for the switch and subcase being on the same level12:18.08 
  would prefer if you indented the case lines one level more12:18.20 
Robin_Watts tor8: Hey, it's you're C-style, not mine!12:18.31 
  s/you're/your/12:18.38 
tor8 I indent the { when I have blocks after the case12:18.52 
Robin_Watts tor8: I'd prefer case to always be indented.12:18.58 
  tor8: Why don't I let you hack on it for a bit?12:19.17 
  I'll bash on gs for a bit.12:19.53 
tor8 sure.12:19.53 
  Robin_Watts: two commits on mujs tor/master for review12:22.21 
Robin_Watts First one looks fine (indentation warning)12:45.49 
  second one... why the change to fs_defaultalloc ?12:45.58 
  seems harmless, but just wondered why you removed it.12:48.07 
  As much as I understand the rest of it, it looks fine.12:48.23 
tor8 Robin_Watts: it's simpler and more obvious (and I finally got round to checking that all the existing realloc implementations to make sure they're sane)12:50.04 
  Robin_Watts: do you have any pdf portfolio test files?12:50.40 
Robin_Watts tor8: Raed send some.12:51.33 
tor8 Robin_Watts: found 'em12:52.16 
Robin_Watts "PDF Portfolio", 22/11/2016 18:2512:52.16 
tor8 Robin_Watts: okay, so I've spotted a general problem with pdf saving13:02.50 
  if we save to the same name as an existing file, without the 'incremental' flag, we're going to bomb because we try to read from the same file we're writing to13:03.30 
Robin_Watts tor8: Yeah, that's part of the design, though.13:05.52 
tor8 really? throwing an exception when saving back a file non-incrementally is intended to crash and corrupt the file?13:06.29 
Robin_Watts tor8: "Don't save back to the same file unless it's incremental, or you'll corrupt it", is the design.13:07.23 
tor8 I think that's bad design13:07.44 
Robin_Watts If you can see a way to spot that and protect against it, great.13:08.11 
tor8 I'd open it with O_CREAT|O_EXCL, but with stdio it's not that easy13:10.14 
Robin_Watts Do we pass in filenames? Or do we pass in an output stream?13:14.05 
tor8 Robin_Watts: adding a remove() call in fz_new_output_with_filename (if not appending) solves the problem on linux13:14.26 
  on windows you can't remove files while they're open so there we will still have issues13:14.44 
Robin_Watts tor8: yeah.13:15.19 
tor8 uhm, do we always linearize when saving incrementally?13:15.49 
Robin_Watts "Don't save back to the same file unless it's incremental, or you'll corrupt it" seems like the simplest statement.13:15.57 
tor8 ah, nvm. uninitialized memory.13:16.04 
Robin_Watts fz_throw(ctx, FZ_ERROR_GENERIC, "Can't do incremental writes with linearisation"); :)13:16.44 
tor8 oh bollokcs. incremental save on a freshly created document doesn't write a full document.13:20.37 
 Forward 1 day (to 2016/12/10)>>> 
ghostscript.com
Search: