| <<<Back 1 day (to 2016/12/28) | 20161229 |
Robin_Watts | camelopard2: Sorry, I don't think we can hand that out to anyone. | 12:03.10 |
| camelopard2: Do you have a particular reason for wanting it? | 12:28.14 |
camelopard | Robin_Watts: I wanted to look into the bug 695343. | 16:32.01 |
| Robin_Watts: I need a project for "practical training" at my school, but cannot find any. | 16:33.04 |
| Robin_Watts: Valgrind bugs are mostly obsolete and need retesting. | 16:34.15 |
| Robin_Watts: gsview 6 is proprietary. | 16:34.47 |
kens | GSView 6 isn't decided yet :) | 16:35.17 |
Robin_Watts | camelopard: We have been fixing bugs, hence the valgrind stuff is hopefully decreasing. If you can spot stuff we've fixed and haven't closed, please let us know. | 16:36.39 |
| Yeah, GSView is "in flux" at the moment. I believe the plan is that at least the basic version will be open source, but we aren't there yet. | 16:37.04 |
camelopard | Robin_Watts: Most bugs refer to private tests. I have found 3 bugs that no longer generate warnings on public test files. | 16:39.59 |
Robin_Watts | camelopard: Partly that's because when people have valgrinded in the past, they have given us the problem files on condition we don't let them out into the wild. | 16:40.51 |
| They don't want to be the source of exploits :) | 16:41.06 |
| If you sign an NDA with us, we can probably give you access. | 16:41.30 |
| but that will probably have to wait until the new year, as the head office is closed I think. | 16:42.12 |
| Forward 1 day (to 2016/12/30)>>> | |