| | <<<Back 1 day (to 2017/06/19) | 20170620 |
| kens2 | ms NickSed | 16:02.21 |
| Robin_Watts | sebras, kens: We have both a tests and a tests_private repo. | 16:27.55 |
| | The PDFs in the 'tests' repo are public, so might do as the base for any putative fuzz testing efforts. | 16:28.24 |
| | but like chrisl, I'm of the opinion that we should fix the problems we have waiting already first. | 16:28.44 |
| sebras | Robin_Watts: ok, the only reason would be if we think this category of errors are more important than the bugs we have. | 16:30.36 |
| chrisl | sebras: how wold we know? | 16:31.19 |
| Robin_Watts | What reason might we have to think that ? | 16:31.20 |
| sebras | Robin_Watts: chrisl: if many users report crashing bugs then it might worth to try to put some effort into trying to fix these before users experience them. | 16:38.12 |
| | Robin_Watts: chrisl: for mupdf I think this is not that common given bugzilla contents, for gs I have no idea. | 16:38.34 |
| | Robin_Watts: chrisl: other than that I can't think of a reason. | 16:38.59 |
| chrisl | sebras: But what makes one set of fuzzing bugs more important than another? | 16:39.00 |
| Robin_Watts | sebras: But what reason do we have to believe that the bugs generated by OSS-fuzz would be more valid/higher priority than the ones from elsewhere? | 16:39.06 |
| sebras | ah! I misunderstood the question. I agree, they are all the same. | 16:40.47 |
| | chrisl: I have a small patch on ghostpdl:sebras/master do you mind taking a look at the commit? | 18:11.47 |
| | chrisl: I believe it to have clustered successfully. | 18:12.06 |
| | chrisl: I stumbled upon this when wanting to use "gs file.pcl" and it failed and then I found pcl2pdf and it referred to the wrong binary. | 18:13.28 |
| | Forward 1 day (to 2017/06/21)>>> | |
Log of #ghostscript at irc.freenode.net.