Log of #ghostscript at irc.freenode.net.

Search:
 <<<Back 1 day (to 2018/02/19)20180220 
backtrack_ hi00:44.51 
ghostbot Welcome to #ghostscript. If you have a question, please ask it, don't ask to ask it. Do be prepared to wait for a reply as devs will check the logs and reply when they come on line. If you are looking for help or infomation about MuPDF, try the new #mupdf channel.00:44.51 
backtrack_ to print images into a pdf00:44.58 
  i need to use the image viewer software?00:45.09 
kens backtrack_ I don't understnad your question.08:02.11 
deekej hello chrisl, could you please merge this pull-request once you have a moment? :)12:27.46 
  https://github.com/ArtifexSoftware/urw-base35-fonts/pull/2012:27.46 
  thanks12:27.48 
chrisl deekej: donre12:28.51 
  Or even "done!12:28.56 
  <sigh>12:29.01 
deekej ^_^12:29.06 
backtrack_ kens, i need to make a pdf from some jpg13:36.10 
  the only way i found is to open images, then print it to pdf printer13:36.33 
  is the only way?13:36.37 
Robin_Watts backtrack_: You can do it using ghostscript directly.13:57.29 
  On windows, presumably?13:57.46 
kens Yeah in the 'lib' directory of the Ghostscript installation, use viewjpeg.ps and the pdfwrite device. viewjpeg.ps will read a JPEG file and the pdfwrite device creates PDF files from whatever input its supplied with. Don't know what happens about media sizes, you may have to set that yourself14:01.58 
Robin_Watts I've been trying: gswin32c.exe -o out.pdf -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -r<whatever resolution you want> -- lib/viewjpeg.ps -c "(input.jpg) viewJPEG"14:02.35 
  but that's not working... what am I doing wrong?14:02.45 
kens Dunno, give me a minute14:02.51 
kens hunts up a jpeg14:02.57 
Robin_Watts gswin32c.exe -o out.pdf -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -r<whatever resolution you want> -- lib/viewjpeg.ps -c "(input.jpg) viewJPEG showpage"14:03.08 
  That worked.14:03.11 
kens Oh so it wants a showpage ? weird.14:03.24 
Robin_Watts no, I lie, that didn't work either :(14:03.57 
kens OK one second14:04.04 
  Oh -r has no real effect on pdfwrite by the way14:05.11 
Robin_Watts gswin32c.exe -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -o out.pdf lib/viewjpeg.ps -c "(image.jpg) << /PageSize 2 index viewJPEGgetsize 2 array astore >> setpagedevice viewJPEG"14:06.19 
kens gswin32 -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -sOutputFile=out.pdf \ghostpdl\lib\viewjpeg.ps -c "(D:/temp/out.jpg) viewJPEG showpage" -f14:07.27 
  That worked for me14:07.31 
Robin_Watts My invocation came from the end of viewjpeg.ps, and sets the sizes etc :)14:07.57 
kens Yeah I know, but mine is easier for a quick test14:08.07 
  Seems the JPEG is scaled to the media size, my default is Letter14:08.30 
backtrack_ kens, the softwae i use is called PDFCreator15:07.44 
kens Not anything from us. If you check back above there is a suggested route to use Ghostscript to produce PDF files directly from an image.15:08.22 
  If you use the next release of Ghostscript it should not decompress the JPEG either, which has quality benefits15:09.08 
backtrack_ kens, is not a fast solution15:09.30 
kens IAgain, I don't know what you mean. Given that PDF Creator is almost certainly using Ghostscript, using Ghostscript directly is bound ot be faster than opening the image in an application and printing it.15:10.31 
backtrack_ kens, there is not some software that allows opening images and creats pdf?15:54.17 
kens Yes, Ghostscript does that, we told you so above15:54.17 
  There are bound to be other solutions, its a simple enough task15:54.17 
backtrack_ kens, the solution you are talking about is the one with commands?15:56.38 
kens Well yes, if you want a GUI you'll have to look elsewhere. What's the problem with a command line ?15:57.05 
  You can always write a shell script15:57.22 
backtrack_ kens, at work in office you need a faster solution15:58.00 
kens In what way is htis not fast ?15:58.10 
  I would expect that a command line solution would be faster than a GUI-based applcation15:58.29 
  As I already said, opening an application, printing to a Port Monitor to get a PostScript file, and tehn sending the PostScript to Ghostscript anyway (which is what PDF Creator probably does) is bound to be slower than simply sending the original image straight to Ghostscript15:59.53 
 Forward 1 day (to 2018/02/21)>>> 
ghostscript.com #mupdf
Search: