| <<<Back 1 day (to 2018/12/14) | 20181215 |
Robin_Watts | wilbo: For the logs, yes this is the right place. | 00:12.12 |
| 1200 dpi is high. | 00:12.41 |
| And I suspect a large amount of the time for that device is in the error diffusion, which isn't helped by render threads. | 00:13.20 |
| Try using pbmraw as a device instead and see if that's faster. | 00:14.07 |
wilbo_ | Hi Robin thank you for your assistance. PBMRAW ? Never heard before, its a part of Ghostscript or an own Softwarepackage? | 13:17.17 |
| i want to render this in the shortest time... which CPU / RAM Set do you prefer/recommend ? | 13:19.41 |
kens | The more memory you have, the bigger the fiel you can render in memory. If you have to go to disk then it will beslower. | 13:59.56 |
| We still haevn't seen your source file, oso its rather hard to comment. I'm not sure if you;ve mentioned which version of GS you are using. | 14:00.25 |
| As I recall your command line, you are using tiffscaled, but not setting a down scale factor, you might do better by using a regular tiff output device (maybe) | 14:00.53 |
Robin_Watts | wilbo: pbmraw produces .pbm files. | 14:19.54 |
| They are a well documented format that can easily be converted by most tools into whatever output you need. | 14:20.20 |
| pbmraw files from gs will be produced with halftoning, rather than error diffusion as tiffscaled produces. | 14:20.42 |
| So the quality may be lower, but not hugely so. | 14:21.04 |
| Forward 1 day (to 2018/12/16)>>> | |