Log of #ghostscript at irc.freenode.net.

Search:
 <<<Back 1 day (to 2019/01/02)20190103 
espectalll[m] Hi, can I ask on licensing details over here?13:05.10 
kens You can ask, but we probably can't tell you much. Its only the engineering staff here, and wehile we can clarify some points, we are not lawyers13:05.48 
  If you are unsure about your usage under the AGPL you probably need to seek qualified proifessional advice13:06.21 
Robin_Watts espectalll[m]: Anything involving dollar amounts, we are unable to answer.13:07.47 
  But we can probably proffer some (non guaranteed) personal opinions on whether a particular usage pattern is conformant or not.13:08.48 
  espectalll[m]: Why don't you ask, and we'll tell you if it's outside the boundaries of what we are comfortable answering.13:09.28 
espectalll[m] Sure, I'll ask straight, it doesn't involve dollars hopefully13:23.27 
  What's the current licensing for GhostPDL fonts?13:23.58 
kens The URW fonts are AGPL as I recall13:24.11 
  The PCL fonts are (I think) a different licence13:24.28 
  More restrictive13:24.35 
  Which ones did you mean ?13:24.56 
espectalll[m] I was wondering about some URE fonts that aren't part of Base3513:25.21 
kens s/URW/PostScript/13:25.27 
espectalll[m] Specifically URW Classic Sans13:25.31 
kens That's a PCL font13:25.40 
  Well, its a TrueType format but its supplied as part of the PCL package13:25.53 
  That's supplied under the old Aladdin licence I think13:26.24 
espectalll[m] Yeah, that and the two LICENSE files (at / and pcl/) confuse me13:26.36 
  But it seems like it is Alladin at first13:26.54 
kens The *fonts* are aladdin, the code is AGPL13:27.06 
Robin_Watts espectalll[m]: Where are you looking for those license files? (in ghostpdl.git or a ghostpdl release archive? Or somewhere else?)13:27.36 
espectalll[m] On the release archive13:27.50 
kens For historical reasons basically. I wasn't arouind for the history of all this, but we changed the soruce licecne to GPL then AGPL, btu we can't change the licence for the fonts because we don't own them13:27.52 
espectalll[m] oh, it's not owned by Artifex?13:28.13 
kens The fotns aren't, no13:28.20 
espectalll[m] Should I contact URW then?13:28.22 
kens The source code for the program is13:28.27 
  NB we don't own the PostScript fonts either, all the fonts are (I think) Owned by URW13:28.49 
Robin_Watts Artifex paid URW for a license to the PCL fonts. They sold us the rights to ship them under the Aladdin license.13:29.04 
kens We negotiated a AGPL licence for the PostScript fonts, but the PCL fonts... what Robin said13:29.20 
Robin_Watts In order to ship them under the GNU AGPL, we'd need to relicense the fonts.13:29.39 
  That would require a) us being prepared to spend the money, and b) URW being prepared to relicense them.13:29.58 
  I am not sure whether it's a) or b) or both that's stopping that. I *suspect* b, but I could be wrong.13:30.52 
espectalll[m] I see, I'll try to see what I can do then13:30.52 
  Thanks!13:30.55 
kens NP13:30.59 
  Ah here's the relevant bit from 'LICENSE' in /ghostpdl/pcl:13:31.57 
  The set of truetype fonts in the urwfonts directory are necessary for13:31.57 
  the PCL/XL interpreter to function properly but they ARE NOT FREE13:31.57 
  SOFTWARE and are NOT distributed under the GNU GPL. They can instead13:31.57 
  be redistributed under the AFPL licence which bars commercial use.13:31.57 
  If your copy of GhostPDL includes these fonts, you should have13:31.57 
  received a copy of the the Aladdin Free Pubilc License, usually13:31.57 
  in a file called COPYING.AFPL. If not, please contact Artifex13:31.58 
  Software, Inc. 1305 Grant Avenue - Suite 200, Novato, CA13:31.58 
  94945 USA, or visit http://www.artifex.com/13:31.59 
espectalll[m] Makes me wonder if those fonts have been removed from Linux distros since e.g they would be incompatible with the DFSG13:33.44 
kens For some Linux distros I'm sure that is the case13:33.57 
  I cna't speak for all of them....13:34.17 
  ator, having a bad connection day ?13:34.32 
ator kens: messing about with ZNC bouncer day13:34.43 
kens ah! :-)13:34.49 
ator sorry for the connection noise13:34.59 
Robin_Watts Tweaking his log on scripts to cope with the change in nick, I bet.13:34.59 
ator Robin_Watts: I installed a private ZNC bouncer on my own server13:35.25 
Robin_Watts Ah.13:35.32 
ator Robin_Watts: #artifex doesn't remember the invite for 'ator'13:35.36 
Robin_Watts I wonder why... let me look at my twiki page.13:35.55 
  ator: https://twiki.ghostscript.com/do/view/Ghostscript/IrcSetup13:37.41 
  Did you do the "Joining Artifex step?"13:37.54 
  Try now?13:39.04 
ator Robin_Watts: I get "Channel #artifex ator is not registered."13:39.44 
Robin_Watts ator: I've invited you to artifex.13:40.50 
ator Robin_Watts: yeah. the invite is a one-time only thing.13:41.08 
  something else needs to be done to make it stick :/13:41.18 
Robin_Watts I hope I've made it permanent.13:41.19 
  Try: /msg chanserv invite #artifex13:41.41 
ator okay, that worked13:42.17 
  without the nick on the end13:42.21 
Robin_Watts will fix the webpage.13:43.14 
  twiki13:43.15 
 Forward 1 day (to 2019/01/04)>>> 
ghostscript.com #mupdf
Search: