Log of #ghostscript at irc.freenode.net.

Search:
 <<<Back 1 day (to 2019/01/14)20190115 
loke Hello Ghostscript13:06.30 
  Is this is place to ask questions about it?13:06.40 
ator loke: yes.13:25.12 
loke ator: Thanks :-)13:25.21 
  It should be a simple question: 13:25.46 
  I have a set of PDF's which I'm converting to PNG. Each PDF is a graph generatef from Gnuplot originally (I think)13:26.28 
  Some of these becomes very small, and what I want to do is to find a way to tell GS to always generate the PNG with a given size (for example, I want to say that they all should be 600 pixels wide).13:27.09 
  Is there a way to do that? The only way I found was to use the -r flag, but that requires manually experimentation to figure out what the correct value is for each document.13:27.42 
ator loke: have you tried -g<width>x<height>?13:28.39 
  ah, nevermind, that doesn't do what you want13:29.56 
loke I tried that, and you're right. It doesn't do what I want.13:30.22 
ator well, you could try mupdf to convert PDF to PNG as well: mutool draw -w <width> -h <height> -o out%d.png input.pdf13:31.42 
  that scales to fit13:31.54 
loke Never heard of mupdf. :-)13:33.04 
ator mupdf does what you're asking for, I think to use gs you'll need to script it yourself unfortunately. you can use the 'bbox' device to extract the page dimensions.13:34.41 
  and then use that to compute the correct resolution to get the pixel width you desire13:34.54 
  but of course that will ignore the white margins, so also not what you want.13:35.21 
loke ator: Thanks for the information.14:42.17 
  I will look at mupdf14:42.28 
  mupdf seemed to solve the problem. Thanks!14:58.29 
norbertj quit15:14.29 
paulgardiner ator: please have a look at the commit on my master branch. I need it for muso. I believe it's a step in direction that you've previously suggested.15:21.46 
ator paulgardiner: can pdf_remove_focus be made static, or do you use it outside of pdf-form.c's pdf_pass_event?15:32.45 
paulgardiner I do15:33.01 
  Oh hang on! Let me check15:33.19 
ator otherwise, LGTM15:33.29 
  possibly rename it pdf_clear_focus?15:33.49 
paulgardiner Ah yes. That's a better name. And it can be static, so I will make that change too.15:34.25 
  Thanks Tor.15:35.03 
  Actually, although I don't use pdf_clear_focus at the moment, I think I probably should be in some cases. I'm getting away without it at the moment only because tapping not within any field is the usual way an editing session ends.15:41.27 
  ... so, can we keep it?15:41.42 
ator paulgardiner: keep it public? sure.15:49.43 
paulgardiner Ta15:49.54 
 Forward 1 day (to 2019/01/16)>>> 
ghostscript.com #mupdf
Search: