| | <<<Back 1 day (to 2020/06/30) | Fwd 1 day (to 2020/07/02) >>> | 20200701 |
| zhangang | hi | 03:58.57 |
| ghostbot | Welcome to #ghostscript. If you have a question, please ask it, don't ask to ask it. Do be prepared to wait for a reply as devs will check the logs and reply when they come on line. If you are looking for help or infomation about MuPDF, try the new #mupdf channel. | 03:58.57 |
| ShakespeareFan00 | Hi | 19:10.41 |
| ghostbot | Welcome to #ghostscript. If you have a question, please ask it, don't ask to ask it. Do be prepared to wait for a reply as devs will check the logs and reply when they come on line. If you are looking for help or infomation about MuPDF, try the new #mupdf channel. | 19:10.41 |
| ShakespeareFan00 | I have what I think is a concern about Ghostscript and image decoding | 19:11.06 |
| | https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T256848 | 19:11.16 |
| | When using gsviee60 which has been withdrawn, I get a quality output | 19:11.37 |
| | When using Ghostscript directly, into GSView5.0 | 19:11.57 |
| | I get a low quality image. | 19:12.10 |
| | And GSView5.0 generates a LOT of errors. | 19:13.07 |
| | When I try to extract text, and after the error generated from that refused to anything else | 19:14.10 |
| | in effect making it useless. | 19:14.16 |
| | The issue of course with GSview5.0 is that it's ancient | 19:20.45 |
| | <<<Back 1 day (to 2020/06/30) | Forward 1 day (to 2020/07/02)>>> | |
Log of #ghostscript at irc.freenode.net.