Log of #ghostscript at irc.freenode.net.

Search:
 <<<Back 1 day (to 2021/02/02)Fwd 1 day (to 2021/02/04) >>>20210203 
jeanb i have a semi-random question re: ghostpcl01:45.16 
  i'm trying to convert a pcl file to a pdf, but it looks like ghostpcl is swapping out arial for nimbus01:45.39 
  is it possible to load arial to my system so ghostpcl can use it?01:46.04 
  i think the font code is 1660201:46.15 
chrisl jeanb: You cannot, no. And why would you care?07:33.05 
artifexirc-bot <chrisl> @KenSharp ping09:30.58 
  <KenSharp> pong09:31.11 
  <chrisl> I've two commits for your consideration (top two): https://git.ghostscript.com/?p=user/chrisl/ghostpdl.git;a=summary09:32.06 
  <KenSharp> Bug 703454 looks good, neater than I expected09:33.09 
  <KenSharp> The other one is the slightly bonkers security report ?09:33.36 
  <chrisl> Yeh, it's from https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=70345209:33.59 
  <KenSharp> That's what I thought yes. It would be helpful to be able to run the entire problem but I can't say I'm too bothered by it. I guess it makes sense to cover the possibility09:34.39 
  <KenSharp> But really, if you run with no security, what do they expect ?09:34.54 
  <KenSharp> The fix looks fine though09:35.07 
  <chrisl> Well, from the Postscript they sent, I can see what allows the problem, but to actually make it happen now means running with -dNOSAFER (doh!), *and* breaking the internal security measures - so I don't think it's ever likely to arise in real life. *But* it a (relatively) rarely traverse piece of code, so I'm not so worried about a couple of extra checks09:36.55 
  <KenSharp> Yes that was what I felt. I did read the PostScript and made some guesses about what it was doing. I wouldn't want to add massive type checking all over the place but it's fair enough for the error handler09:37.44 
  <chrisl> So, if someone changes the our code to remove security measures, *and* runs with -dNOSAFER and expects it to be secure, then I'm afraid they are beyond help09:38.31 
  <KenSharp> That was pretty much my conclusion even before your proposed fix ūüôā09:39.15 
  <KenSharp> Both look fine to me09:39.22 
  <chrisl> Cool, pushed. Thanks09:39.34 
  <KenSharp> I'll pull them over to pdfi later, I'm trying to remember how txtwrite works....09:39.58 
  <chrisl> And (wrong channel!) I'm going to change the byte * to char * in the pdfi_load_font_by_name_string() for pdfi09:40.44 
  <KenSharp> I did wonder why we were here, but its not a problem ūüėĄ09:41.03 
  <KenSharp> I thought @NancyABQ made that change already, maybe I misread here commit09:41.19 
  <chrisl> Well, Tor is talking mupdf on #artifex, so I figured this would avoid clashing with that09:41.43 
  <KenSharp> Not a problem09:41.54 
  <KenSharp> And yeah, @NancyABQ commit last night changed the byte * to a char *09:42.09 
  <chrisl> Okay, cool, forget that then!09:42.44 
artifexirc-bot <KenSharp> returns to cryptic note scribbling09:43.32 
  <ator> #toomanychannels!10:37.54 
matvils Hi! I have maybe stupid question, that bugs me. 13:28.43 
  It is possible to use ghostscript to make Raster Image processing scripts for offsetprinting? 13:28.47 
  Basicly thouse are monohrome tif files, linear or stochastic screening. I managed to get some results with tiffsep1 and ghostscripts default ps file.13:28.53 
  Second, is it posible implement some color corection with ghostscript?13:28.58 
  Of course i have licensed RIP software, that do the job, but i want to move some workflow to linux stations. Maybe there is some caveats, that will kill my idea in begining?13:29.04 
artifexirc-bot <KenSharp> I don't know what you mean by 'scripts' in this sens. Ghostscript can produce monochrome TIFF files from PostScript or PDF input13:29.30 
matvils I managed to do that. But is there way to manage color corection? My guess is icc profiles? 13:31.44 
artifexirc-bot <KenSharp> Ghostscript offers colour management via ICC profiles. This is documented13:31.58 
  <KenSharp> in the ghostpdl/doc folder is GS9_Color_Management.pdf13:32.39 
matvils Then basicly i need to study mode postscript to configure screening and generate some icc profiles to implement. Thanks.13:36.23 
jeanb chrisl: the font is definitely arial, but it's getting swapped out for nimbus mono, which i think is throwing off the PDF file appearance when we're going from pcl to pdf.14:15.38 
  i ran the pcl file through the 'pcl paraphernalia' prn file analysis utility.14:15.58 
chrisl Well, as I said (privately) we can't use Arial.14:16.11 
  Next sily question: have tried raster output, and checked that looks correct?14:16.29 
jeanb i totally get that, but according to the ghostpcl mapping it should map to a sans font - not a mono?14:16.42 
chrisl It should be using NimbusSansNo2-Regular14:17.18 
  Having said that, PCL font selection is not a simple mapping. It's a "best fit" based on the characteristics given, IIRC14:18.19 
jeanb tried rasterizing out of acrobat (again, a noob here) and it looks the same as the pdf14:20.06 
chrisl I meant the PCL, not the PDF14:20.26 
jeanb ah. what tool can i use to do that?14:21.36 
chrisl I assume you are using ghostpcl - I assume that's why you're asking here14:22.03 
jeanb yes. so pcl to an image format?14:22.46 
  <---- total noob.14:22.54 
chrisl What platform are you on?14:23.08 
jeanb linux14:23.22 
  but i can use mac/win14:23.40 
chrisl Okay, so something like: gpcl6 -sDEVICE=ppmraw -r300 -o out%03d.ppm input.pcl14:25.48 
jeanb thanks. the output is very similar to the pdf.14:29.46 
chrisl Well, it's likely that *something* in the PCL input isn't compatible with our PCL interpreter14:31.03 
jeanb that could very well be. when running the file command on the file i was given, it's coming up as "ma21-sample-notices.pcl: ASCII text, with CRLF line terminators, with escape sequences"14:31.58 
  whereas the sample files included with ghostpcl come up as some variable of "HP Printer Job Language data"14:32.32 
chrisl Unfortunately, PCL is something of a moving target, and there's a lot of variation between devices :-(14:33.01 
  There are also fairly fundamental issues converting PCL to PDF that make it unlikely to produce the greatest results, in general14:34.12 
jeanb i guess this file is being generated by an old mainframe system, so i'm not surprised that the conversion to pdf is a bit iffy.14:35.14 
  paraphernalia shows that there is an unknown sequence, i wonder if that could be messing things up as well.14:35.47 
  <Esc>¬† #¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† *** Unknown sequence ***¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 377¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 0¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 37714:35.57 
  <Esc>&d@¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† Underline Disable¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 41¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 0¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 4114:35.58 
  <Esc>&d#D (#=0)¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† Underline Enable: default¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 41¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 0¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 4114:35.58 
  <Esc>&f#S (#=0)¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† Cursor Position Stack: Push (Store)¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 20¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 0¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 2014:35.59 
  <Esc>&f#S (#=1)¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† Cursor Position Stack: Pop (Recall)¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 20¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 0¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 2014:35.59 
  <Esc>&l#O (#=0)¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† Orientation: Portrait¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 1¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 0¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 114:36.00 
  <Esc>&l#S (#=1)¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† Simplex/Duplex: Duplex Long-Edge Bind¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 5¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 0¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 514:36.00 
  <Esc>(#N (#=0)¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† Primary Font: Symbol Set (0N = ISO 8859-1 Latin 1)¬†¬†¬† 1¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 0¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 114:36.01 
  <Esc>(s#B (#=0)¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† Primary Font: Stroke Weight: Medium¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 296¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 0¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 29614:36.01 
  <Esc>(s#B (#=3)¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† Primary Font: Stroke Weight: Bold¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 296¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 0¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 29614:36.02 
  <Esc>(s#H¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† Primary Font: Pitch (# characters per inch)¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 82¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 0¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 8214:36.02 
  <Esc>(s#T (#=16602)¬† Primary Font: Typeface (16602 = Arial)¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 1¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 0¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 114:36.03 
  <Esc>*c#A¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† Rectangle Size Horizontal (# PCL units)¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 5¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 0¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 514:36.03 
  <Esc>*c#B¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† Rectangle Size Vertical¬†¬† (# PCL units)¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 95¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 0¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 9514:36.04 
  <Esc>*c#P (#=0)¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† Fill Rectangular Area: Solid Area¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 95¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 0¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 9514:36.04 
  <Esc>*p#X¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† Cursor Position Horizontal (# PCL units)¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 110¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 0¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 11014:36.05 
  <Esc>*p#Y¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† Cursor Position Vertical¬†¬† (# PCL units)¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 220¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 0¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 22014:36.05 
  <Esc>*t#R (#=300)¬†¬†¬† Raster Graphics Resolution (300 dots-per-inch)¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 5¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 0¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬†¬† 514:36.06 
chrisl I don't use Paraphernalia, so I've no idea how complete it is, nor what device(s) it targets14:38.06 
  I suppose another option is to see what an actual PCL printer does with the input14:39.05 
ray_laptop jeanb: a debug build of gpcl6 running with -ZI will dump what we are interpreting (in a sort of disasm format)16:26.20 
 <<<Back 1 day (to 2021/02/02)Forward 1 day (to 2021/02/04)>>> 
ghostscript.com #mupdf
Search: