| | <<<Back 1 day (to 2017/08/28) | 20170829 |
| sebras | tor8 (for the logs): I got at message from malc that 841dce12d2a4efac7e2f8b908e935487fe95e807 messed with the annotations in DDI0487A_a_armv8_arm_errata.pdf | 07:41.57 |
| | this commit comes from my fix for https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697951 | 07:42.40 |
| | quite possibly I misunderstood how /Open false is supposed to work. should /N in the /AP dict be drawn in this case? | 07:43.44 |
| | and what does it mean that _both_ Text and Popup annotations have /Open? | 07:44.01 |
| | when rereading pdfref17.pdf page 621 about Text annotations I see that it does mention that /Open false implies drawing an icon. I guess that this is what is in /N | 07:45.19 |
| | but how do we know that? | 07:45.47 |
| | we only know that /N is 'the normal appearance when the annotation is not interacting with the user.' | 07:46.26 |
| | also /N might have subdirectories depending on state according to page 614, I'm guessing and /Open and /Closed would make sense here. but neither PDF uses this. | 07:47.29 |
| | finally, is the _non-editable_ pop-up window showing the text (described on page 621) somehow different from the _editable_ pop-up window showing the same text (described on page 637)? | 07:49.28 |
| | ugh.. annotations really _are_ a mess. :-/ | 07:49.36 |
| kens | sebras you might want to check the PDF 2.0 specification, it might have reworded some of the annotations stuff | 08:24.16 |
| sebras | kens: good point. I'll take a look later. | 08:32.38 |
| kens | I only thought of it because I'm working my way through the tests.... | 08:33.03 |
| | Forward 1 day (to 2017/08/30)>>> | |
Log of #mupdf at irc.freenode.net.