| | <<<Back 1 day (to 2017/09/25) | 20170926 |
| avih | tor8: re https://github.com/ccxvii/mujs/issues/49 , it's a bit hasty to close it, isn't it? he didn't specify a specific suit. he basically asks how can it be tested for conformance. which is very valid question, which was not answered... | 13:41.58 |
| tor8 | I don't have an answer, and I don't have time to hold his hands in running test suite scripts. | 13:43.14 |
| | and the test suite he mentioned tests ES2015 not ES5. | 13:43.33 |
| hid | hi | 13:48.42 |
| mubot | Welcome to #mupdf, the channel for MuPDF. If you have a question, please ask it, don't ask to ask it. Do be prepared to wait for a reply as devs will check the logs and reply when they come on line. | 13:48.42 |
| hid | i took the 1.7a source archive | 13:49.04 |
| | i just want to know how to add the flag -fPIC to use mupdf with zathura-pdf-mupdf | 13:49.36 |
| tor8 | I'd probably try to ask the Zathura developers first. | 13:51.20 |
| | if you're building regular mupdf, the compiler flags are in Makerules | 13:51.34 |
| | or can be specified with "make XCFLAGS=-fPIC" | 13:51.45 |
| avih | tor8: it would be nice to know how it confirms though, both for you and for users. i'd think generally running a conformance test suit which matches mujs support is something which mujs could document. | 14:04.32 |
| tor8 | it would be nice to have, but all the ones I've looked at use browser features and bindings | 14:05.01 |
| avih | i don't know if you ran it yourself, but if you haven't then despite best efforts, how much it conforms would be a guess. | 14:05.17 |
| | huh, weird (re requiring browser). | 14:05.57 |
| | i believe duktape does track conformance with some official suit. i wonder how they do it. | 14:06.41 |
| tor8 | could be worth looking into. | 14:15.42 |
| | Forward 1 day (to 2017/09/27)>>> | |
Log of #mupdf at irc.freenode.net.