| | <<<Back 1 day (to 2018/11/27) | 20181128 |
| sebras | tor8: I updated the throw/warn commit you commented on. I have added a number of new commits that ought to be rather trivial to review. the commit on the top is "the ones that I don't think ought ot be private". | 02:43.45 |
| paulgardiner | tor8: I've sent that missing attachment, so you may have another email in your spam folder. Any info in the headers as to why the previous one got classified as spam? | 11:08.55 |
| tor8 | I suspect it's triggering on Kate's signature that looks all business-like and spammy :) | 11:09.57 |
| | "It's similar to messages that were detected by our spam filters." is what google says (about the reply too...) | 11:10.27 |
| sebras | Robin_Watts: the pwg output device. how have you tested that the format complies with the spec? | 12:10.15 |
| | Robin_Watts: did you view the pwg raster somehow? | 12:10.25 |
| Robin_Watts | sebras: pwg and cups are very close. | 12:10.37 |
| sebras | I know. | 12:10.42 |
| Robin_Watts | cups is like pwg with a few more fields filled out. | 12:10.50 |
| sebras | yes. | 12:10.57 |
| Robin_Watts | and I viewed the cups output, IIRC> | 12:10.59 |
| sebras | oh, a manual inspection of the format? | 12:11.16 |
| Robin_Watts | No, I had a tool that displayed the cups raster. | 12:11.38 |
| | It's possible that I may have written that tool of course :) | 12:11.48 |
| sebras | :) | 12:11.54 |
| Robin_Watts | cos bmpcmp can read cups output I think. | 12:12.00 |
| sebras | that would make sense I guess. | 12:12.12 |
| Robin_Watts | I *think* there is a cupsraster tool isn't there? | 12:12.22 |
| sebras | that's what I'm looking for. | 12:12.53 |
| | rastertopwg and rastertohp I and things like that, thos I can find. | 12:13.10 |
| | rastertopdf found! | 12:14.39 |
| Robin_Watts | sebras: So, are you seeing a problem with pwg format? | 12:16.40 |
| sebras | Robin_Watts: no I just want to make sure I don't break anything. | 12:16.53 |
| Robin_Watts | sebras: What are you changing? | 12:17.05 |
| sebras | and so I want to do a test conversion and see the output. | 12:17.07 |
| | I'm experimenting with moving the mono field in to the pwg_options | 12:17.38 |
| | seems like that was what you intended to do, but then it ended up elsewhere. :) | 12:17.52 |
| Robin_Watts | So just diffing the old and new outputs would be a safe test ? | 12:18.01 |
| sebras | Robin_Watts: yes, but also I was intrigued by how you actually viewed those files when you implemented it. | 12:18.48 |
| paulgardiner | tor8: there are a couple of commits on my master that I need for in-place editing. The first is just the stext one you prepared with an extra couple of lines of code. The second is something we need, but you may not like the API I've chosen. I've given the document an editing state, whereas one might prefer a flag to the text-setting function. Anyway, please have a look when you have a chance. | 13:43.04 |
| jogux | tor8: was there a conclusion on https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700236 ? (is it something we can work around relatively soon?) | 18:48.51 |
| | Forward 1 day (to 2018/11/29)>>> | |
Log of #mupdf at irc.freenode.net.