Log of #mupdf at irc.freenode.net.

Search:
 <<<Back 1 day (to 2019/06/13)Fwd 1 day (to 2019/06/15)>>>20190614 
ator sebras: see tor/master for some encryption related commits before you reply to raed09:28.19 
sebras ator: I was also looking for the clean encryption commit. I don't know where it was lost.09:42.31 
ator sebras: during one of your rebases I think09:42.46 
  because it hadn't been updated for the upwd_utf8 rename09:42.55 
sebras ator: or I completely forgot to pick it up from your branch.09:43.11 
ator sebras: anyway, updated commit, along with a few more, on tor/master09:43.51 
  with that your example can be: mutool clean -E rc4-40 -U userpass -O ownerpass -P 12 input.pdf encrypted.pdf09:44.24 
sebras your three commits looks reasonable.09:47.51 
  I'd like to add the first commit on sebras/master.09:48.04 
  perhaps s/method/algorithm/..?09:48.19 
ator sebras: there should be 4 commits09:48.26 
  it's the combination of algorithm and number of bits09:48.55 
sebras ator: now there are four.09:48.58 
ator "Improve error message." LGTM09:49.21 
  so I think 'method' is fine09:49.46 
sebras ator: the usage string LGTM.09:50.35 
ator sebras: thanks.09:57.04 
sebras ator: I'm running it in the cluster.09:57.19 
  not that it matters.09:57.25 
ator only if we slipped up somewhere :)09:57.45 
sebras since I tend to do that myself, I always run it.09:58.04 
  ator: the cluster came out good.09:59.37 
  ator: will do you the push?10:00.04 
ator sebras: done.10:02.16 
sebras ator: is there any point in showing the -gl implementation to read?10:06.07 
  I'm not quite sure how mupdf is used in their case.10:06.43 
ator not really, no. it's more likely to confuse than help. the 'mutool clean' commit is probably a better choice of example.10:07.47 
  there are quite a number of commits involved now, maybe just point him to origin/master?10:09.21 
sebras I'm afraid there might be one more.10:09.47 
  oh, the java code doesn't need to use pdf_default_write_options.10:10.55 
ator no, nothing that calls parse_write_options needs it10:11.11 
sebras ator: pdf_write_document() and pdf_save_document() have interesting names.10:32.22 
  ator: isn't pdf_write_document() missing things that are present in pdf_save_document()? seems to to me.10:33.33 
ator sebras: don't blame me :)10:57.31 
  but yes, I don't see why pdf_save_document doesn't just call pdf_write_document?10:57.44 
  I guess the incremental thing?10:58.02 
sebras naah.10:58.08 
  it is only java calling pdf_write_document().10:58.14 
  I can't see that java needs special treatment.10:58.21 
  it may need to pass fz_output instead of a filename, but that ought to be the only difference.10:59.01 
ator the other foo_(save|write)_things are different, there the "save" function is just a wrapper for the "write" function10:59.06 
  the fz_save_pixmap_as_foo family10:59.29 
  oh, hm, not exactly. nevermind then.11:00.03 
  though I don't see why not, they could all be simplified it looks like to me11:00.47 
sebras ator: can I trouble you with looking at the mail?11:11.17 
  I'd better get that sent today.11:11.27 
ator sebras: looks good to me.11:20.57 
sebras ator: thanks!11:25.24 
  done.11:27.24 
 <<<Back 1 day (to 2019/06/13)Forward 1 day (to 2019/06/15)>>> 
ghostscript.com #ghostscript
Search: