| | <<<Back 1 day (to 2020/06/11) | Fwd 1 day (to 2020/06/13)>>> | 20200612 |
| txt23 | Does muPDF has a viewer like PDF.js that we can use as SDK on web? | 17:36.01 |
| Robin_Watts_ | We have a demo of that, yes. | 17:37.39 |
| txt23 | Can we see it? | 17:38.00 |
| Robin_Watts_ | If you contact sales@artifex.com they can help you out with that. | 17:38.14 |
| txt23 | We are trying to load PDFs via SDK and then add our own Fabric.js on top | 17:38.15 |
| | Sending email now | 17:38.22 |
| Robin_Watts_ | It's designed to offer the same API as pdf.js so it should be pretty much a drop in replacement. | 17:38.57 |
| | but it will do "proper" annotations etc. | 17:39.13 |
| txt23 | Nice. | 17:40.16 |
| | All we need is Canvas load the rest we've built in. | 17:41.46 |
| | Issue with PDF.js is its not working on iOS | 17:41.54 |
| malc_ | txt23: how come? | 17:42.13 |
| Robin_Watts_ | Hmm. The web version of mupdf relies on wasm. | 17:44.30 |
| txt23 | WebAssembly might be solution here | 17:45.54 |
| Robin_Watts_ | If you want to target ios, then why not drive mupdf natively? It'll be faster etc. | 17:46.51 |
| txt23 | We have to have web compatible version | 17:47.16 |
| Robin_Watts_ | ok. | 17:47.26 |
| txt23 | Its one of those must have req. for us | 17:47.29 |
| Robin_Watts_ | Well, if WASM is acceptable, then we should be able to help you out. | 17:50.10 |
| txt23 | Yes it should. Having correctly loaded PDF is all we need. The rest we can do in-house. Will wait for a reply back from sales. Appreciate your help Robin_Watts_ | 17:51.04 |
| Robin_Watts_ | np. | 17:52.49 |
| akko | hi! just wondering if you guys managed to figure out what was triggering windows defender on mupdf | 18:00.50 |
| Robin_Watts_ | akko: Does an up to date windows defender still trigger on it? | 18:01.12 |
| akko | it doesn't :o | 18:02.40 |
| | what was it? | 18:02.43 |
| Robin_Watts_ | duff windows defender signatures. | 18:02.59 |
| | i.e. a bug in the data that MS released for windows defender. | 18:03.12 |
| akko | what a surprise XD | 18:03.40 |
| sebras | akko: I reported it to Microsoft and asked for a manual analysis. within a day they had concluded it was of no hard. | 18:43.50 |
| | harm. | 18:43.53 |
| | because some other online anti-virus services also claimed that mupdf contained malware I sent it to F-secure for a separate analysis. they also confirmed that it was clean. | 18:45.07 |
| malc_ | the sentiment that i have expressed on ocaml channel few days ago and is probably worth repeating, in presence of thompson's hack it is in general very hard (if not impossible) to prove presence/absence of malware | 18:49.17 |
| | <<<Back 1 day (to 2020/06/11) | Forward 1 day (to 2020/06/13)>>> | |
Log of #mupdf at irc.freenode.net.