[gs-bugs] [Bug 691529] Regression: difference with r11549

bugzilla-daemon at ghostscript.com bugzilla-daemon at ghostscript.com
Thu Aug 5 07:45:10 UTC 2010


Ken Sharp <ken.sharp at artifex.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #3 from Ken Sharp <ken.sharp at artifex.com> 2010-08-05 07:45:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> I've been going through the thousands of differences caused by r11549 and so
> far have come across one file which appears to be a regression.  See the
> attached 11548.png and 11549.png files.
> The command lines used:
>   bin/gs -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -o test.pdf -r300 ./Bug687044.ps
>   bin/gs -sDEVICE=ppmraw -o test.ppm -r300 ./test.pdf

Actually this file has always been wrong. By some weird co-incidence
Ghostscript was previously able to produce the expected result, but Acrobat
(our reference) always missed the offending text.

This is believed to be another manifestation of type 3 font problems with
pdfwrite, and we already have an open report for this (which already includes
this file).

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 691383 ***

Configure bugmail: http://bugs.ghostscript.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

More information about the gs-bugs mailing list